Skip Navigation

Eligible for a Baby Formula lawsuit?

Enfamil NEC Lawsuit Cleared For MDL Trial in July 2026

Enfamil NEC Lawsuit Cleared For MDL Trial in July 2026

The first federal bellwether trial involving allegations that a premature baby developed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) from cowโ€™s milk-based infant formula has been cleared to move forward, focusing on claims that the side effects of Enfamil formula resulted in the death of a newborn only days after birth.

Abbott Laboratories and Mead Johnson currently face nearly 800 Similac NEC lawsuits and Enfamil NEC lawsuits filed nationwide, each involving nearly identical allegations that the manufacturers failed to warn families or the medical community about the risk that preterm newborns may be left with devastating, and sometimes fatal injuries after consuming the popular infant formula products.

NEC occurs when harmful bacteria infiltrate the walls of a newbornโ€™s intestines, causing portions of the tissue to become inflamed or die. Preterm infants carry a much higher risk for the condition because their gastrointestinal tract may not be fully developed. However, studies have found that the use of cow’s milk-based infant formula products, such as Similac or Enfamil, substantially increase the risk.

Treatment for NEC often requires antibiotics or surgery in a hospital neonatal intensive care unit. However, many infants, especially those born prematurely, do not survive NEC, and those who do may be left with lifelong health complications.

Enfamil Similac NEC Lawsuit
Enfamil Similac NEC Lawsuit

Infant Formula Bellwether Trials

For the past several years, all federally filed NEC infant formula lawsuits have been consolidated before U.S. District Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer in the Northern District of Illinois, as part of a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL).

To help manage the large litigation, Judge Pallmeyer has instructed the parties to prepare a series of representative cases for early test trials, known as โ€œbellwetherโ€ trials, which will give the parties an opportunity to see how juries weigh arguments and evidence that would be repeated throughout the other claims.

The first federal bellwether trials were originally scheduled to start in April 2025, but following a number of pretrial rulings regarding the sufficiency of plaintiffs’ evidence and testimony, the start of the first trial has been delayed.

Following a status conference late last month, Judge Pallmeyer issued an order (PDF) announcing that the first bellwether trial will now involve an Enfamil lawsuit filed by Alexis Inman, over the death of her son Daniel, which will get underway on July 6, 2026. That trial will then be followed by a Similac lawsuit against Abbott Laboratories, which will begin on August 10, 2026.

The Inman case was officially cleared to proceed to trial when Judge Pallmeyer issued a memorandum opinion and order (PDF) on May 8, rejecting Mead Johnson & Company’s motion for summary judgment in Inmanโ€™s lawsuit. However, the court did agree to dismiss its subsidiary, Mead Johnson Nutrition Company, finding that there was insufficient evidence that the unit was involved in the manufacture or sale of the products used.

The next NEC lawsuit to go to trial will involve claims brought by Mary Kelton of California, whose preterm daughter suffered permanent injuries following NEC allegedly caused by Similac. That trial is scheduled to begin on August 10, 2026. Both trials are expected to last about two weeks.

Infant Formula Lawsuit Verdicts

There are numerous additional infant formula NEC lawsuits filed in state courts, some of which have already gone to trial, with many resulting in multi-million dollar verdicts against the manufacturers.

Last month, Abbott was ordered to pay $70 million in compensatory and punitive damages to four mothers who claimed Similac caused their newbornsโ€™ NEC. It took the jury only 10 hours to reach a verdict.

It was the third Similac state court lawsuit to go to trial. The first, held in the summer of 2024, ended in a nearly $500 million verdict in Missouri state court. A similar trial, held in the same court in November of that year, ended in a defense verdict. However, that verdict was vacated last year and a new trial ordered, following a judgeโ€™s ruling that Abbott repeatedly introduced inadmissible evidence to the jury.

Mead Johnson has not escaped unscathed, being ordered to pay $60 million after a trial in Chicago in 2024.

While none of the outcomes of these cases nor the upcoming bellwether trials will be binding on the other remaining claims, the verdicts and payouts could have significant bearing on any infant formula lawsuit settlement negotiations.

To stay up to date on this litigation, sign up to receive infant formula NEC lawsuit updates sent directly to your inbox.

Irvin Jackson
Written By: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

According to a lawsuit brought against the manufacturer and the FDA, an Abbott Eterna spinal cord stimulator has caused pain, shocks and complications instead of the relief promised.
A Depo-Provera intracranial meningioma lawsuit claims Pfizer developed and sold a defective birth control injection that puts women at a five times increased risk of brain tumors.
A lawsuit alleges an Illinois woman developed CTCL after using Dupixent, raising concerns the manufacturer may have withheld concerns that the drug could contribute to cancer.