Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
AFFF Lawsuit Exposure to firefighting foam chemicals may result in an increased risk of cancer for firefighters, military and airport personnel.
Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Exposure to the toxic herbicide Paraquat has been linked to a risk of Parkinson's disease.
EPA Unveils Strategy For Commercial Chemical Evaluations January 18, 2017 Russell Maas Add Your Comments Federal environmental safety officials have announced three new rules that are designed to form the backbone of a strategy that will evaluate and regulate new chemicals, to help determine potential risks to the public health and environment. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the proposed rules on January 13, which would establish the first-ever, comprehensive regulatory strategy for chemicals entering U.S. commerce. The three new rules follow the passing of The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act, which was signed into law by President Barack Obama on June 22, 2016, as the first update to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) since it was originally enacted in 1976. Do You Know about… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION In addition to the new “foundational” rules, the EPA has also proposed three rules restricting specific high risk uses of a number of chemicals. The rules must be finalized by June 2017, according to mandates set in the new chemical law. Oversight and regulation has become a necessity for chemicals entering U.S. commerce, given the new technology and scientific developments that prove certain popular household chemicals used heavily over the last forty years may actually be harmful and cause diseases from overexposure, experts say. The EPA indicates that the proposed rules will set into motion a process designed to quickly evaluate chemicals that have been entered into commerce over the last decade, by granting them the authority to identify chemicals made in, imported into or processed within the U.S. The EPA will decide which of those have potential health and environmental risks through the use of scientific data and assess those risks and pursue regulatory controls as needed. As part of the new rules, the EPA will be required to systemically prioritize existing chemical substances that have entered the market within the past 10 years. The new process will be managed by the EPA’s Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention and Office of General Counsel. The American Chemistry Council released a statement praising the EPA for their fast development and implementation of the new chemical evaluation rules. Since Congress last amended the TSCA when it was enacted into law in 1976, tens of thousands of chemicals were automatically grandfathered into production as presumable safe materials without any federal or scientific evaluation to assess their risk to human or environmental risks. According to prior research by the EPA, of the 85,000 known chemicals, about 1,000 are used in everyday consumer products and are in need of safety reevaluation. The EPA placed 90 chemicals known to pose health risks on a list called the TSCA Work Plan and intends to place those chemicals high on its prioritization list. Included in the EPA’s new rules, the agency has set specific agendas for certain chemicals, particularly for paint and coating removal uses of two solvents, methylene chloride and n-methylpyrrolide, dry cleaning and aerosol degreasing uses of other solvents including trichloroethylene, and the vapor degreasing uses of trichloethylene. In December, the EPA announced ten chemicals it was making a priority to review, including asbestos and dioxane. When a chemical is deemed to pose an unreasonable risk the EPA must take action within two years, with the possibility of an extension to four years. Bans and phaseouts have to occur within five years of an assessment that a chemical is unreasonably dangerous. For new chemicals, the EPA must review and declare that a chemical is safe before it is allowed on the marketplace and can ban, require additional testing, or place limitations on new chemicals and their uses. Much of the funding will come from chemical manufacturer user fees. When a manufacturer wants their chemical tested, they must pay 50% of the cost if it’s already on the EPA’s agenda, or 100% if the EPA has not yet scheduled a review. They will pay fees for submitting test data, for notices of new chemicals, and other activities. Tags: Asbestos, Chemicals, Congress, Dioxane, EPA More Lawsuit Stories Court Clears BioZorb Lawsuit Design Defect Claims Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker March 26, 2025 Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial Selections To Be Made in Late April 2025 March 26, 2025 Lithium-Ion Battery Explosions Could Be Prevented by New Kind of Sensor March 26, 2025 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermNameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Court Clears BioZorb Lawsuit Design Defect Claims Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (Posted: today) A U.S. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITGroup of 7 BioZorb Injury Lawyers Appointed to Leadership Positions in Lawsuits Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (03/19/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File Lawsuit Over Recalled BioZorb Tissue Marker (03/12/2025)BioZorb Attorneys Propose Leadership Structure for Lawsuits Over Recalled Tissue Marker (03/05/2025) Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial Selections To Be Made in Late April 2025 (Posted: today) Parties have until April 28 to turn in a list of six Bard PowerPort lawsuits that should be prepared for bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITSmiths Medical Port Catheter Recall Issued Over Manufacturing Error (03/20/2025)E. Coli Infection Was Caused by AngioDynamics SmartPort Port Catheter, Lawsuit Alleges (03/03/2025)Schedule To Prepare Bard PowerPort Lawsuits for Bellwether Trials To Be Proposed by Parties (02/27/2025) Uterine and Endometrial Cancer Caused by Hair Relaxer Products: Lawsuit (Posted: yesterday) A hair relaxer lawsuit claims long-term use of chemical straighteners led to the development of uterine and endometrial cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITSchedule for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trials Outlined by MDL Judge (03/13/2025)Synthetic Braiding Hair Contains Cancer-Causing Chemicals: Consumer Reports (03/05/2025)Hair Relaxer Wrongful Death Lawsuit Links Fatal Endometrial Cancer to Chemical Straightener Use (03/04/2025)
Court Clears BioZorb Lawsuit Design Defect Claims Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (Posted: today) A U.S. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITGroup of 7 BioZorb Injury Lawyers Appointed to Leadership Positions in Lawsuits Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (03/19/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File Lawsuit Over Recalled BioZorb Tissue Marker (03/12/2025)BioZorb Attorneys Propose Leadership Structure for Lawsuits Over Recalled Tissue Marker (03/05/2025)
Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial Selections To Be Made in Late April 2025 (Posted: today) Parties have until April 28 to turn in a list of six Bard PowerPort lawsuits that should be prepared for bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITSmiths Medical Port Catheter Recall Issued Over Manufacturing Error (03/20/2025)E. Coli Infection Was Caused by AngioDynamics SmartPort Port Catheter, Lawsuit Alleges (03/03/2025)Schedule To Prepare Bard PowerPort Lawsuits for Bellwether Trials To Be Proposed by Parties (02/27/2025)
Uterine and Endometrial Cancer Caused by Hair Relaxer Products: Lawsuit (Posted: yesterday) A hair relaxer lawsuit claims long-term use of chemical straighteners led to the development of uterine and endometrial cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITSchedule for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trials Outlined by MDL Judge (03/13/2025)Synthetic Braiding Hair Contains Cancer-Causing Chemicals: Consumer Reports (03/05/2025)Hair Relaxer Wrongful Death Lawsuit Links Fatal Endometrial Cancer to Chemical Straightener Use (03/04/2025)