Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
FDA Seeks To Address Concerns Over Toxic Metals In Baby Food March 15, 2021 Russell Maas Add Your Comments In the wake of a recent Congressional report that highlighted dangerous levels of toxic heavy metals in many popular baby foods, federal health officials are preparing to launch a series of regulatory actions, aimed at setting action levels for certain contaminants, as well as increasing facility inspections and product sampling. The FDA issued a statement on March 5, announcing new initiatives aimed at reducing harmful chemicals from entering or developing in baby food products, as well as boosting compliance and enforcement actions. The initiatives outlined in the release include a near term commitment to review the current action levels for contaminants in baby foods, and to continuously monitor those levels and lower them if appropriate. Determinations made from the review of action levels for contaminants will be provided to the industry with guidance on how to meet new obligations. BABY FOOD LAWSUITS Was your child exposed to toxic baby food? Toxic baby food sold by Gerber, Beech-Nut and other manufacturers contain dangerous levels of heavy metals, which may be the cause of autism and severe ADHD for children. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION BABY FOOD LAWSUITS Was your child exposed to toxic baby food? Toxic baby food sold by Gerber, Beech-Nut and other manufacturers contain dangerous levels of heavy metals, which may be the cause of autism and severe ADHD for children. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Under the plan, the FDA will begin working with government, academia, and stakeholders of the food industry to review and develop research to determine the allowable levels of harmful chemicals such as lead, arsenic, cadmium and mercury in baby food products. The FDA also announced it will begin increasing inspections of food manufacturing facilities while boosting sampling and testing of foods for babies and young children. These tests and results will be made available to the public, according to the agency. In addition to the initiatives outlined in the release, the FDA also issued a letter to baby and children food manufacturers on March 5, reminding them of their legal responsibility to ensure the safety of their products under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The letter reiterated that manufacturers have an existing responsibility to consider risks from chemical hazards which include toxic elements levels on final products. โOur new activities will further efforts that the agency has continued to take in this area, including our work in 2020 to finalize an action level for inorganic arsenic in infant rice cereal. Weโll be working to develop additional action levels, finalize our draft guidance on reducing inorganic arsenic in apple juice and publish a draft guidance that will establish action levels for lead in juices,โ the FDA statement, attributed to acting commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, and Susan T. Mayne, director of the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, states. โThese activities, along with an increase in sampling and reporting, will help continue to drive down levels of toxic elements in foods.โ The initiatives were announced on the heels of a House Oversight Committee report released on February 4, which highlighted internal documents and testing data indicating baby food products manufactured by Gerber (d/b/a Nestlรฉ Nutrition), Beech-Nut Nutrition, Plum and others contain dangerous levels of heavy metals, which are toxic to infants and may result in permanent neurological damage. Findings from the U.S. Congressional report indicated some baby foods contain more than 91 times the maximum level of arsenic allowed in bottled water; 177 times the allowable levels of lead, 69 times the limits on cadmium, and five times the levels of allowable mercury. As a result of the reportโs findings, a growing number of baby food lawsuits continue to be filed throughout the federal court system nationwide. Many of the complaints against the baby food manufacturers raise common allegations that the products were falsely advertised as safe for children, while containing harmful levels lead, arsenic, cadmium and mercury. The FDA and U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have long maintained exposing infants and children to toxic heavy metals can cause a permanent decrease in IQ, an increased risk of future criminal and antisocial behavior, and untreatable and frequently permanent brain damage. Heavy metal exposure to infants is a serious concern.ย Lead exposure at any level is extremely unsafeย for children. Prior studies have linked heavy metal exposure toย behavioral impairments, brain damage, damage to the nervous system, seizures, growth impairments, and even death. More oversight is needed to help protect infants from serious health side effect sand long-term health damage, the congressional report concluded. Written by: Russell Maas Managing Editor & Senior Legal Journalist Russell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Arsenic, Baby Food, Congress, Heavy Metals, Toxicity More Baby Food Lawsuit Stories Court Excludes Expert Witnesses Linking Metal in Baby Foods to Autism, ADHD Among Children March 4, 2026 Tainted Baby Food Lawsuit Against Whole Foods, Hain Celestial Returned to Texas State Court February 27, 2026 Lead Exposure in Childhood May Increase Adolescent Depression: Study February 17, 2026 0 Comments NameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Lawyers To Nominate Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases for Early Bellwether Trials Next Week (Posted: today) Plaintiffs and defendants involved in hair relaxer cancer lawsuits are expected to turn in a list of 12 cases that the parties believe are fit to serve as bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITCourt Outlines Procedures When Women Die After Filing a Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit (02/25/2026)Hair Extension Chemicals May Be More Harmful Than Previously Thought: Study (02/17/2026)MDL Judge Issues New Deadlines for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Preparations (02/04/2026) Cartiva Implant Recall Lawsuits Move Forward, as Plaintiffs Seek Compensation for Big Toe Surgery Failures (Posted: yesterday) Cartiva implant lawsuits are moving forward in federal court as patients across the United States seek compensation for complications linked to the recalled big toe device. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (02/10/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Cartiva Implant Loosened, Degraded in Great Toe (02/05/2026)Big Toe Fusion Lawsuit Filed Over Failed Cartiva SCI Implant (01/27/2026) Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks (Posted: 2 days ago) An Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuit filed by three women says the product was defectively designed, inappropriately approved by the FDA, and left them with severe injuries, worsening pain and the need for removal surgery. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Airport Body Scanner Destroyed Woman’s Spinal Cord Stimulator, Requiring Surgical Removal (03/03/2026)Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Unnecessary Shocking Sensations (02/27/2026)Boston Scientific Pacemaker Lawsuit Claims Recalled Device Caused Life-Threatening Situation (02/25/2026)
Court Excludes Expert Witnesses Linking Metal in Baby Foods to Autism, ADHD Among Children March 4, 2026
Tainted Baby Food Lawsuit Against Whole Foods, Hain Celestial Returned to Texas State Court February 27, 2026
Lawyers To Nominate Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases for Early Bellwether Trials Next Week (Posted: today) Plaintiffs and defendants involved in hair relaxer cancer lawsuits are expected to turn in a list of 12 cases that the parties believe are fit to serve as bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITCourt Outlines Procedures When Women Die After Filing a Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit (02/25/2026)Hair Extension Chemicals May Be More Harmful Than Previously Thought: Study (02/17/2026)MDL Judge Issues New Deadlines for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Preparations (02/04/2026)
Cartiva Implant Recall Lawsuits Move Forward, as Plaintiffs Seek Compensation for Big Toe Surgery Failures (Posted: yesterday) Cartiva implant lawsuits are moving forward in federal court as patients across the United States seek compensation for complications linked to the recalled big toe device. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (02/10/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Cartiva Implant Loosened, Degraded in Great Toe (02/05/2026)Big Toe Fusion Lawsuit Filed Over Failed Cartiva SCI Implant (01/27/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks (Posted: 2 days ago) An Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuit filed by three women says the product was defectively designed, inappropriately approved by the FDA, and left them with severe injuries, worsening pain and the need for removal surgery. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Airport Body Scanner Destroyed Woman’s Spinal Cord Stimulator, Requiring Surgical Removal (03/03/2026)Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Unnecessary Shocking Sensations (02/27/2026)Boston Scientific Pacemaker Lawsuit Claims Recalled Device Caused Life-Threatening Situation (02/25/2026)