Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Individuals who suffered severe burns, or families who lost a loved one in a tabletop fire pit explosion, may be eligible for financial compensation through a fire pit injury lawsuit.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Roblox Lawsuit Families are filing Roblox lawsuits after children were targeted by predators for grooming, sextortion, sexual abuse, or exploitation on the platform. Learn who qualifies, what cases allege, and how to file a confidential claim.
Ocaliva Lawsuit Ocaliva lawsuits are being investigated for users who experienced liver failure, cirrhosis progression, transplant, or death after taking the drug, alleging that Intercept Pharmaceuticals failed to warn about the risk of dosing toxicity and accelerated liver damage.
ByHeart Formula Recall Lawsuit Parents are now filing ByHeart recall lawsuits alleging that contaminated infant formula caused botulism and other serious illnesses after the company failed to prevent or warn about dangerous manufacturing lapses.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
FDA to Hold Public Hearings on Medical Device Approval Process February 1, 2010 AboutLawsuits Add Your Comments The FDA has scheduled a public meeting for late this month to review review the controversial process used to swiftly approve medical devices, which some say has been overused and allowed dangerous devices to be implanted in patients. According to a statement released last week, the FDA scheduled a public meeting for February 18. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss challenges facing the agency’s pre-market notification process, also known as the 510(k) process, which allows quick approval of medical devices if they can be shown to be substantially similar to products already on the market. Critics and studies have suggested that the FDA leans too heavily on the process for quick medical device approval, which has led to dangerous and, in some cases, deadly medical devices onto the market. The meeting will include open comment sessions on issues involving previously approved devices, new technology and scientific evidence, FDA practices in the face of high volumes of submissions, and post-market surveillance. Do You Know about… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION The hearings come after the release of several studies that have been highly critical of FDA’s ability to adequately investigate medical devices to ensure that they are safe for use in consumers. Two studies, published late last year, found that the FDA does not require enough clinical trials and that it often accepts suspect data at face value. One study, conducted by researchers from the University of California and published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, found that two thirds of approved devices only went through one clinical trial before being unleashed on the market, and most of those trials involved less than 300 subjects. The other study, conducted by researchers from the FDA and Boston’s Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and published in the American Journal of Therapeutics, indicated that about 40% of the studies used to decide what devices are approved lack clear definitions of safety requirements. In addition, a study by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released in June found significant shortcomings and a heavy reliance on the 510(k) process. The GAO report identifies gaps in the FDA reviewing process, deficiencies in the agency’s postmarket surveillance, and also found that FDA has not kept up with regular inspections of medical device manufacturing facilities. Many devices which should be put through the more stringent premarket approval process are put through the premarket notification process instead, the GAO found. The meetings also come as Congress ponders what to do about a 2008 Supreme Court decision in Riegel vs. Medtronic, which determined held that the FDA approval of a medical device can make manufacturers immune from product liability lawsuits for injuries caused by the defective design of their devices. Legislation called the Medical Device Safety Act of 2009 was introduced last year to overturn that decision, but there has been no action on the bill since hearings this summer. As a consequence of the Supreme Court decision, thousands of pending medical device lawsuits have been dismissed, including cases filed on behalf of thousands of patients injured by the recalled Medtronic Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead. A Medtronic Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead recall was issued on October 15, 2007, after it was discovered that the small wires used to connect defibrillators to the heart was prone to fracture or break. Although the defective design has caused hundreds of people to suffer unnecessary shocks or caused their defibrillator to fail when it was needed to deliver a life-saving jolt, a federal judge ruled earlier this year that patient claims for medical expenses and other compensation are now barred because the FDA approved the design of the device. The meeting will be held on February 18 from 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. at the Hilton Washington, D.C./North Gaithersburg, in Gaithersburg, Maryland. Those wishing to attend the meeting or participate must register by 5 p.m. on February 12. The FDA will accept written or electronic comments until March 5, 2010. The meeting will be also webcast live at http://www.ConnectLive.com/events/fda021810. Tags: Medical Device, Product Liability, Sprint Fidelis More Lawsuit Stories Amazon Foot Warmer Lawsuit Alleges Heated Insoles Exploded, Caught Fire December 10, 2025 Lawsuit Alleges TikTok Causes Mental Health Problems for Young Users December 10, 2025 Adzynma Side Effects May Be Linked to Child’s Death, FDA Warns December 10, 2025 1 Comments Peter February 9, 2010 If Congress does not act to overturn the Supreme Court ruling, I suggest that the following warning be read and handed to every potential recipient of a Class lll device. Medical Device Warning Label For All Class III Medical Devices This warning label is to advise you of potential risks associated with the use of Class III Medical Devices. The Medical Device Act of 1974 gave the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the authority to license and approve medical devices. Therefore, this device has been approved for general use by the FDA. Be aware, however, that the United States Congress as well as many experts familiar with the agency have stated on the record that the FDA is both underfunded and understaffed, and therefore may not have had the capacity adequately to verify all safety risks associated with this device. Also, be advised that this device has not been tested on large numbers of patients, and that it is a fact that a certain percentage of this type of device will malfunction or fail, with the potential to cause you great pain and suffering, and maybe even death. At the very least, you may need to undergo significant and costly health care follow up services to correct the problems caused by the malfunctioning device. Also, please be advised that because of a recent United States Supreme Court decision, if this device fails or malfunctions, you will not be able to sue the manufacturer of the device, unless the manufacturer has violated FDA regulations during or after the approval process. This means that either your health insurance company, you, or your family will be responsible for all costs incurred to rectify the problems caused if the device fails or malfunctions. Finally, please be advised that manufacturers of medical devices are the only companies in the country which have been granted this type of immunity from tort action. Medical Device Warning Label For All Class III Medical Devices This warning label is to advise you of potential risks associated with the use of Class III Medical Devices. The Medical Device Act of 1974 gave the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the authority to license and approve medical devices. Therefore, this device has been approved for general use by the FDA. Be aware, however, that the United States Congress as well as many experts familiar with the agency has stated on the record that the FDA is both underfunded and understaffed, and therefore may not have had the capacity adequately to verify all safety risks associated with this device. Also, be advised that this device has not been tested on large numbers of patients, and that it is a fact that a certain percentage of this type of device will malfunction or fail, with the potential to cause you great pain and suffering, and maybe even death. At the very least, you may need to undergo significant and costly health care follow up services to correct the problems caused by the malfunctioning device. Also, please be advised that because of a recent United States Supreme Court decision, if this device fails or malfunctions, you will not be able to sue the manufacturer of the device, unless the manufacturer has violated FDA regulations during or after the approval process. This means that either your health insurance company, you, or your family will be responsible for all costs incurred to rectify the problems caused if the device fails or malfunctions. Finally, please be advised that manufacturers of medical devices are the only companies in the country which have been granted this type of immunity from tort action. PhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Class Action Lawsuit Against FanDuel Seeks To Recover Losses for Californians (Posted: yesterday) A lawsuit against FanDuel claims the company is operating illegal fantasy sports betting in California, which has an active ban against online gambling. MORE ABOUT: SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITLawsuit Over DraftKings ‘No Risk’ Bet Promotions Cleared to Move Forward (11/25/2025)Lawsuit Over FanDuel, DraftKings Sports Betting Problems Returned to State Court (11/20/2025)Sports Betting Corruption and Addiction Concerns Highlighted By Recent MLB, NBA Player Indictments (11/12/2025) Court To Weigh Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Tumors in Mid-2026 (Posted: 2 days ago) A federal judge is expected to decide which scientific experts each side may present during the early Depo-Provera meningioma test trials around the middle of next year. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit MDL Status Hearings Scheduled Throughout 2026 (12/01/2025)Depo-Provera Litigation Now Includes Over 2,000 Brain Tumor Lawsuits Brought by Women (11/20/2025)Lawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera Caused Brain Surgery, After Meningioma Diagnosis (11/11/2025) Dupixent CTCL Lawsuit Filed Over Diagnosis of Both Mycosis Fungoides and Sezary Syndrome (Posted: 5 days ago) A Louisiana man was diagnosed with two rare forms of T-cell lymphoma after receiving Dupixent injections for less than two years. MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDrug Makers Must Respond to Dupixent Lawsuit Over Lymphoma Diagnosis by Jan. 7, 2026 (12/02/2025)Dupixent for Nasal Polyps Nears FDA Approval Amid Lymphoma Side Effect Lawsuits (11/17/2025)Dupixent Sales Surge Amid Growing CTCL Cancer Lawsuit Allegations (10/29/2025)
Class Action Lawsuit Against FanDuel Seeks To Recover Losses for Californians (Posted: yesterday) A lawsuit against FanDuel claims the company is operating illegal fantasy sports betting in California, which has an active ban against online gambling. MORE ABOUT: SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITLawsuit Over DraftKings ‘No Risk’ Bet Promotions Cleared to Move Forward (11/25/2025)Lawsuit Over FanDuel, DraftKings Sports Betting Problems Returned to State Court (11/20/2025)Sports Betting Corruption and Addiction Concerns Highlighted By Recent MLB, NBA Player Indictments (11/12/2025)
Court To Weigh Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Tumors in Mid-2026 (Posted: 2 days ago) A federal judge is expected to decide which scientific experts each side may present during the early Depo-Provera meningioma test trials around the middle of next year. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit MDL Status Hearings Scheduled Throughout 2026 (12/01/2025)Depo-Provera Litigation Now Includes Over 2,000 Brain Tumor Lawsuits Brought by Women (11/20/2025)Lawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera Caused Brain Surgery, After Meningioma Diagnosis (11/11/2025)
Dupixent CTCL Lawsuit Filed Over Diagnosis of Both Mycosis Fungoides and Sezary Syndrome (Posted: 5 days ago) A Louisiana man was diagnosed with two rare forms of T-cell lymphoma after receiving Dupixent injections for less than two years. MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDrug Makers Must Respond to Dupixent Lawsuit Over Lymphoma Diagnosis by Jan. 7, 2026 (12/02/2025)Dupixent for Nasal Polyps Nears FDA Approval Amid Lymphoma Side Effect Lawsuits (11/17/2025)Dupixent Sales Surge Amid Growing CTCL Cancer Lawsuit Allegations (10/29/2025)