Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
FDA Issues Warning Over Use of Surgical Robots To Perform Mastectomies August 23, 2021 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsFederal regulators are warning patients and healthcare providers that they have not confirmed the safety or effectiveness of surgical robots for mastectomy procedures, or for the treatment of breast cancer.In safety communication issued on August 20, the FDA indicates it has become aware of claims that clinical studies are being conducted on the use of robot-assisted surgery (RAS) devices for mastectomy procedures as a means of preventing breast cancer. However, the agency warns that if such studies are being done, they are not being done with the required FDA oversight.“There is little evidence on the safety and effectiveness of the use of RAS devices in patients undergoing mastectomy for the prevention or treatment of breast cancer, and the FDA has not granted any RAS system marketing authorization for mastectomy,” the FDA warns. “For patients undergoing mastectomy, the surgical approach used with RAS devices differs from conventional surgical approaches. The impact of these differences on prevention of cancer, overall survival, recurrence, and disease-free survival have not been established.”Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONRobotic surgery involves the use of complex, computerized machines which allow doctors to perform surgical procedures through small incisions to the patientโs body. They often can help reduce surgical pain, blood loss, scarring, infection, and limit recovery time after surgery when compared to traditional surgical procedures.During these robotic surgeries, computers help guide the surgeon to precisely control surgical instruments attached to mechanical arms. The surgeon can create small incisions while viewing the surgical site in three-dimensional high definition.Robotically-assisted surgery is often touted as a breakthrough and revolutionary treatment option, with hospitals and medical facilities touting a myriad of advantages. However, concerns have emerged among some consumer advocates in recent years that facilities may push wider use of robot surgery than is necessary, as part of an effort to recoup costs associated with the expensive devices.The FDAโs safety communication notes that robotic surgical devices have been approved for some procedures which often involve patients suffering from cancer, including hysterectomies, prostatectomies and colectomies.โThese clearances are based on short-term (30 day) patient follow up,โ the agency noted in its warning. โThe FDA has not evaluated the safety or effectiveness of RAS devices for the prevention or treatment of cancer, based on cancer-related outcomes such as overall survival, recurrence, and disease-free survival.โThe agency reminded study sponsors that they must obtain FDA approval of investigational device exemptions (IDE) for studies of robot surgery devices involving mastectomy procedures that aim to prevent or treat breast cancer. That is because these clinical trials could pose a significant risk to the study subjects, and the agency must assure there are adequate safety, health and welfare protections for the test subjects.This is not the first time the FDA has issued a warning regarding mastectomies performed by robot surgery. The agency released a similar safety communication in February 2019, warning that individuals who undergo robot surgery for mastectomies or other cancer treatments may have reduced long-term survival rates.In the latest warning, the FDA recommended patients and caregivers be aware RAS devices have not been approved for mastectomies for the prevention or treatment of breast cancer, and called on them to discuss the benefits, risks and alternatives of all available treatment options with their healthcare providers. The agency also urged patients and caregivers to ask the surgeons about their training, experience, patient outcomes, the number of similar robotically-assisted procedures they had performed, and about the potential short-term and long-term complications of such procedures.The FDA also issued a series of recommendations for healthcare providers, calling on them to:Be aware robotic surgical devices have not been approved for mastectomy or the prevention or treatment of breast cancer.Get appropriate credentials and training for the specific RAS device they intend to use/Discuss their experience, training and clinical outcomes with patients.Discuss the benefits and risks of all available treatment options with their patients.Be aware that clinical studies done in the U.S. involving a legally marketed device being tested for a new intended use are subject to FDA oversight.File a report with the FDA MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting Program if any patient experiences an adverse effect or complication following robotic surgery. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Breast Cancer, Mastectomy, Robot Surgery, Surgical RobotMore Lawsuit Stories Jury Selection Underway in First Bard PowerPort Trial Over Infection Claims April 16, 2026 HeartMate II Wrongful Death Lawsuit Claims LVAD Implant Caused Thrombosis April 16, 2026 Video Game Addiction Lawsuit Claims Devs Use Behavioral Manipulation on Kids April 16, 2026 0 Comments FacebookThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Jury Selection Underway in First Bard PowerPort Trial Over Infection Claims (Posted: today)The first Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial commences next week involving claims that a man suffered a severe infection due to the port catheter’s allegedly defective design.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITJudge Blocks Juries From Hearing About IVC Filter Problems in Bard PowerPort Trials (04/08/2026)Port-a-Cath Lawsuit Alleges Power P.A.C. Break Down Resulted in Serious Port Catheter Infection (03/31/2026)Final Pretrial Conference in Bard PowerPort Lawsuit To Be Held April 9 (03/27/2026) Hearings on Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Brain Tumors Set for Late June 2026 (Posted: yesterday)A federal judge has scheduled general causation hearings for Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuits for June 24 through 26.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITHigh-Risk Brain Tumor From Depo-Provera Requires Frequent Monitoring, Lawsuit Claims (04/06/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (03/25/2026)Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms Reported Among Birth Control Users (03/19/2026) WaveWriter Alpha Lawsuit Claims Defective Spinal Cord Stimulator Caused Pain and Surgical Removal (Posted: 2 days ago)A Louisiana man’s Boston Scientific WaveWriter Alpha SCS lawsuit claims the implant failed to provide the promised pain relief and, in fact, made things worse before it needed to be surgically removed.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Neuromodulation Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Exacerbated Chronic Pain (04/08/2026)Medtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (04/03/2026)Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Filed Over Device Malfunction, Failure (03/30/2026)
Jury Selection Underway in First Bard PowerPort Trial Over Infection Claims (Posted: today)The first Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial commences next week involving claims that a man suffered a severe infection due to the port catheter’s allegedly defective design.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITJudge Blocks Juries From Hearing About IVC Filter Problems in Bard PowerPort Trials (04/08/2026)Port-a-Cath Lawsuit Alleges Power P.A.C. Break Down Resulted in Serious Port Catheter Infection (03/31/2026)Final Pretrial Conference in Bard PowerPort Lawsuit To Be Held April 9 (03/27/2026)
Hearings on Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Brain Tumors Set for Late June 2026 (Posted: yesterday)A federal judge has scheduled general causation hearings for Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuits for June 24 through 26.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITHigh-Risk Brain Tumor From Depo-Provera Requires Frequent Monitoring, Lawsuit Claims (04/06/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (03/25/2026)Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms Reported Among Birth Control Users (03/19/2026)
WaveWriter Alpha Lawsuit Claims Defective Spinal Cord Stimulator Caused Pain and Surgical Removal (Posted: 2 days ago)A Louisiana man’s Boston Scientific WaveWriter Alpha SCS lawsuit claims the implant failed to provide the promised pain relief and, in fact, made things worse before it needed to be surgically removed.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Neuromodulation Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Exacerbated Chronic Pain (04/08/2026)Medtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (04/03/2026)Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Filed Over Device Malfunction, Failure (03/30/2026)