Flame Jetting Lawsuit Claims Amazon Tabletop Fire Pit Erupted, Caused Severe Burns

Texas woman claims Amazon knew that the tabletop fire pits sold through its website lacked sufficient safeguards and could cause severe and disfiguring burns to customers.

A product liability lawsuit alleges that tabletop fire pits sold through Amazon can suddenly erupt in a dangerous “flame jetting” event, posing a serious risk of severe burn injuries to unsuspecting users.

The complaint (PDF) was filed by Nicole Pearson in Texas District Court last month and removed to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas on March 16. It names Amazon.com Services LLC and Sun Dong as defendants, alleging they were involved in the design, manufacture, sale and distribution of the product.

Tabletop fire pits have surged in popularity in recent years, often marketed as decorative indoor or outdoor accessories that use liquid or gel fuels, such as alcohol-based products, to create an open flame. However, when these devices are poorly designed or lack adequate safety features, flammable vapors can build up and ignite without warning, triggering sudden flare-ups, flashbacks, or explosive bursts of flame.

In many instances, these sudden explosions have caused severe burn injuries for those in the fire pits’ vicinity. As the number of product warnings and user injuries continue to mount, a series of tabletop fire pit lawsuits have been brought in recent months, alleging that many alcohol-fueled fire pits are defectively designed, fail to meet safety standards and lack adequate warnings.

Tabletop Fire Pit Risks

According to Pearson’s lawsuit, the fire pit was designed with a defect that allows fuel vapors to ignite in a rapid and uncontrolled manner, creating a “flame jetting” effect that projected flames outward beyond the expected burn area.

The complaint states that Pearson was using the tabletop fire pit in a normal and intended manner when the incident occurred. Without warning, the device allegedly ignited and erupted outward, sending a sudden burst of flames that caused severe burn injuries.

Pearson alleges the fire pit was unreasonably dangerous due to a defective design that failed to properly regulate fuel combustion, prevent the buildup of flammable vapors, or incorporate safeguards to reduce the risk of flashbacks or uncontrolled ignition. The lawsuit also claims the defendants failed to provide adequate warnings or instructions about the dangers of sudden flare-ups, flame jetting or vapor ignition during use or refueling.

As a result, Pearson claims to have suffered serious burn injuries requiring medical treatment, with potential for permanent scarring, ongoing pain and long-term complications.

“Amazon’s acts and omissions were a proximate cause of Plaintiff’s injuries and damages.”

— Nicole Pearson v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al

The lawsuit raises claims of negligence, strict product liability, breach of warranty and violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act. It is seeking damages for medical expenses, pain and suffering, emotional distress, and other losses associated with the injuries.

Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuits

As reports of incidents like Pearson’s continue to emerge, attorneys across the country are reviewing potential tabletop fire pit lawsuits, focusing on injuries allegedly caused by flame jetting, flashbacks and sudden explosions.

Reported injuries tied to these products include:

• Second- and third-degree burns requiring medical treatment
• Permanent scarring, nerve damage or limited mobility
• Inhalation injuries caused by sudden bursts of flame
• Burns affecting children or nearby individuals
• Incidents occurring during refueling that trigger flare-ups
• Fatal injuries linked to fire pit explosions
• Lost income due to time away from work
• Ongoing medical care, including hospitalization and rehabilitation
• Lasting disfigurement or emotional and psychological trauma

Individuals who believe they may have a claim can seek a free case evaluation, during which a tabletop fire pit attorney may help identify the product involved, assess whether it was defective or subject to recall, and explain potential legal options.

All cases are handled on a contingency fee basis, meaning there are no upfront costs and attorneys are only paid if compensation is recovered.

Sign up for more legal news that could affect you or your family.