Toxic PFAS Chemicals Not Just in Firefighter Foam, But Also In Their Protective Gear: Bloomberg

A new report highlights growing concerns among firefighters about the risks associated with toxic cancer-causing chemicals in firefighting foam, which are also present in other protective gear commonly used by departments nationwide.

According to a story published this week by Bloomberg News, several firefighters filed a lawsuit earlier this year in California state court, indicating that their “bunker gear” contained chemicals known as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which are known to increase the risk of cancer among humans and persist in the environment or human body for years.

This means their protective clothing and gear, necessary to prevent injury while fighting fires, could be an additional vector of cancer-causing agents, adding to existing concerns over PFAS in firefighting foams.

Firefighting Foam Lawsuits

Were you or a loved one exposed to toxic AFFF Chemicals?

Lawyers are reviewing aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) lawsuits for firefighters, military personnel and individuals who developed cancer or other health issues from exposure to toxic firefighting foam chemicals.

Learn More About this Lawsuit SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION

Aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) has been used for decades at military bases and by some civilian fire fighting organizations throughout the United States to fight petroleum-based fires which cannot be controlled or subdued by water alone. Versions of the fire foam have been made with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) chemicals, which are known to increase the risk of cancer among humans and persist in the environment or human body for years.

In the United States, a number of communities around military bases, airports and other firefighter training locations have been with high levels of PFAS in local water sources, which are often difficult to remove and may cause widespread health concerns.

While most recent firefighter PFAS lawsuits have focused on film-forming foam, this complaint, representing two dozen firefighters focuses on the presence of PFAS in their protective gear.

All of the firefighters named as plaintiffs in the lawsuit have cancer, with nine of them having prostate cancer. In addition, all of the firefighters had high levels of PFAS in their blood.

In October, the lawsuit was removed from state to federal court. The lawsuit names a number of protective gear manufacturers as defendants, including 3M Company and Johnson Controls Inc.

The Bloomberg report suggests courts may see an influx of these protective gear PFAS lawsuits in coming months. These would be in addition to hundreds of firefighting foam lawsuits pending nationwide, including claims presented by local governments and water districts, as well as claims brought by former firefighters diagnosed with testicular cancer, kidney cancer, pancreatic cancer and other injuries after direct exposure to the chemicals.

Given common questions of fact and law raised in the PFAS litigation, all cases filed throughout the federal court system are currently centralized in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina for coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings, where small groups of water contamination cases and cancer claims are being prepared for early trial dates.

1 Comments

  • RonaldJune 5, 2021 at 3:29 pm

    I am a retired firefighter with years of service now fighting recurrence of prostate cancer. As you can understand, my health and everyday life with me and my family has been severely affected with the effects of chemo and radiation doing an number on me. But, I am one of the lucky ones as I have a loving and supportive family. But I do strongly believe this is in direct corirelationtion to my fir[Show More]I am a retired firefighter with years of service now fighting recurrence of prostate cancer. As you can understand, my health and everyday life with me and my family has been severely affected with the effects of chemo and radiation doing an number on me. But, I am one of the lucky ones as I have a loving and supportive family. But I do strongly believe this is in direct corirelationtion to my fire service. I also do not believe that movement to fix the problem is not fast enough. Thousands of my brother firefights are STILL wearing this dangerously contaminated gear! WHY? Why can’t we get this fixed.

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Master Baby Food Lawsuit Filed in MDL Outlines How Toxic Metals Caused Autism, ADHD in Children
Master Baby Food Lawsuit Filed in MDL Outlines How Toxic Metals Caused Autism, ADHD in Children (Posted 2 days ago)

Plaintiffs have submitted a baby food lawsuit Master Complaint that is expected to streamline the filing of lawsuits alleging that toxic heavy metals in Beech-Nut, Gerber, Hain and Nurture products caused ADHD, autism and other developmental disorders.

Lawsuit Claims AGGA Device Damaged Teeth, Resulting in Disfiguring Injury
Lawsuit Claims AGGA Device Damaged Teeth, Resulting in Disfiguring Injury (Posted 2 days ago)

Another AGGA device lawsuit has been filed by a man who says he had to have the device surgically removed less than a year after having it implanted due to jaw problems and migraines.