Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Individuals who suffered severe burns, or families who lost a loved one in a tabletop fire pit explosion, may be eligible for financial compensation through a fire pit injury lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Ford Fined $165M Over Inaccurate Recall That Was Conducted Too Slowly for Customer Safety Second-largest fine in NHTSA history came days before federal regulators announced two additional investigations into Ford recalls. November 21, 2024 Darian Hauf Add Your Comments Federal safety officials have fined Ford Motor Company $165 million, the second-largest civil penalty in National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) history, for failing to comply with federal requirements regarding a recall, which did not adequately address all vehicles that may experience serious safety problems. NHTSA issued the consent order (PDF) on November 13, after the agency started an investigation into a 2021 Ford recall that did not initially include all vehicles that may experience serious risks due to defective rearview cameras, and failed to provide accurate and complete information about the scope of malfunctions that may occur. Consent orders are legal agreements that a company enters into with federal agencies, to resolve allegations regarding a company’s safety compliances and practices. Following an announcement of the $165 million fine that resolves issues stemming from the 2021 recall, the NHTSA initiated two other investigations into different recalls, which also may have failed to follow federal requirements. One investigation involves a 2024 Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator seatbelt recall, which did not address problems with seatbelts in certain models that were not part of the initial recall. The other investigation involves a 2024 Ford Bronco Sport and Maverick Truck recall over a battery malfunction risks, which may cause vehicles to suddenly lose power. NHTSA has subsequently received at least 15 reports from vehicle owners who already received the recall repair, but are still experiencing problems with sudden power loss. The consent order and fine are intended to improve Ford’s compliance with recall requirements set by the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act. The order will remain in place for three years, with NHTSA reserving the option to extend any part of it for a fourth year. The fine is the second-largest in NHTSA’s 54-year history, behind only a $200 million Takata airbag fine, which was issued in 2015, after millions of vehicles were found to contain defective airbag inflators that may explode and send shrapnel or debris into the passenger compartment during a crash. Learn More About Airbag Recall Lawsuits Millions of Vehicles Were Recalled in 2014 Due to Exploding Airbags That Caused Injuries and Deaths. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Learn More About Airbag Recall Lawsuits Millions of Vehicles Were Recalled in 2014 Due to Exploding Airbags That Caused Injuries and Deaths. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Under the order, Ford is required to review and update its recall decision-making process, improve data analysis for identifying safety defects, enhance information-sharing, and speed up recall decisions. The company will be required to build infrastructure for safety data analytics as well as a platform where all relevant information and documents concerning safety investigations will be made available. In addition, NHTSA is requiring Ford to review all recalls they have issued over the past three years and to build a test lab that focuses on low-voltage electronics, as well as investing in a vehicle identification number (VIN)-based system to track vehicle parts at the VIN level. Finally, Ford must update its Vehicle Safety Act compliance policies and meet with NHTSA quarterly. As investigations into previous recalls are conducted, consumers should stay alert for updates on recalls that may affect their vehicles. “Timely and accurate recalls are critical to keeping everyone safe on our roads,” NHTSA Deputy Administrator Sophie Shulman said in the announcement. “NHTSA is committed to ensuring manufacturers comply with the laws designed to keep our roads safe. When manufacturers fail to prioritize the safety of the American public and meet their obligations under federal law, NHTSA will hold them accountable.” Tags: Ford, Ford Bronco, Ford Expedition, Ford Maverick, Ford Recall, NHTSA Fine, Rearview Camera Image Credit: Shutterstock: Tada Images Written by: Darian Hauf Consumer Safety & Recall News Writer Darian Hauf is a consumer safety writer at AboutLawsuits.com, where she covers product recalls, public health alerts, and regulatory updates from agencies like the FDA and CPSC. She contributes research and reporting support on emerging safety concerns affecting households and consumers nationwide. More Takata Airbag Lawsuit Stories Volkswagen Airbag Recall Impacts Nearly 115,000 Beetles and Passats November 11, 2024 BMW Recall Issued for Nearly 400K Vehicles with Airbags That May Explode July 16, 2024 Nissan Issues Do Not Drive Order for Older Pathfinder, Sentra and QX4 Models with Recalled Air Bags May 30, 2024 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermNameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Lawsuit Blames Ozempic, Mounjaro, Trulicity for Gastroparesis Diagnosis (Posted: yesterday) The makers of GLP-1 drugs, Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly, face another lawsuit claiming they failed to adequately warn consumers about the risks of gastroparesis injuries. MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITGLP-1 Vision Loss Risks Extend Beyond Type 2 Diabetics and Ozempic Users, Study Warns (08/06/2025)Lawsuit Indicates Mounjaro Caused Gastroparesis, Severe Metabolic Acidosis Injuries (07/29/2025)Pancreatitis Risks From Ozempic, Mounjaro Being Investigated by U.K. Regulators (07/15/2025) BioZorb Marker Lawsuit Clears Hurdle To Reach Trial in January 2026 (Posted: yesterday) A federal judge has denied a motion by Hologic to dismiss two BioZorb marker lawsuits scheduled for early bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITNearly 200 Women Pursuing BioZorb Lawsuits Over Complications With Breast Tissue Marker (08/11/2025)Failed BioZorb Tissue Marker to Require Surgical Removal, Lawsuit Claims (08/04/2025)Problems With BioZorb Tissue Markers Not Adequately Disclosed by Manufacturer: Lawsuit (07/28/2025) Colsen Fire Pit Lawsuit Involving Severe Burn Injuries Suffered by a Child Set for Trial Next Year (Posted: 2 days ago) A tabletop fire pit lawsuit claims a Texas woman’s daughter was set on fire during a family gathering by an unexpected jet of flame from a Colsen fire pit that was later recalled due to burn injury risks. MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITAlcohol Fire Pit Recall Lawsuits Are Being Filed Over Severe Burn Injuries and Fatalities (08/07/2025)
Nissan Issues Do Not Drive Order for Older Pathfinder, Sentra and QX4 Models with Recalled Air Bags May 30, 2024
Lawsuit Blames Ozempic, Mounjaro, Trulicity for Gastroparesis Diagnosis (Posted: yesterday) The makers of GLP-1 drugs, Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly, face another lawsuit claiming they failed to adequately warn consumers about the risks of gastroparesis injuries. MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITGLP-1 Vision Loss Risks Extend Beyond Type 2 Diabetics and Ozempic Users, Study Warns (08/06/2025)Lawsuit Indicates Mounjaro Caused Gastroparesis, Severe Metabolic Acidosis Injuries (07/29/2025)Pancreatitis Risks From Ozempic, Mounjaro Being Investigated by U.K. Regulators (07/15/2025)
BioZorb Marker Lawsuit Clears Hurdle To Reach Trial in January 2026 (Posted: yesterday) A federal judge has denied a motion by Hologic to dismiss two BioZorb marker lawsuits scheduled for early bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITNearly 200 Women Pursuing BioZorb Lawsuits Over Complications With Breast Tissue Marker (08/11/2025)Failed BioZorb Tissue Marker to Require Surgical Removal, Lawsuit Claims (08/04/2025)Problems With BioZorb Tissue Markers Not Adequately Disclosed by Manufacturer: Lawsuit (07/28/2025)
Colsen Fire Pit Lawsuit Involving Severe Burn Injuries Suffered by a Child Set for Trial Next Year (Posted: 2 days ago) A tabletop fire pit lawsuit claims a Texas woman’s daughter was set on fire during a family gathering by an unexpected jet of flame from a Colsen fire pit that was later recalled due to burn injury risks. MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITAlcohol Fire Pit Recall Lawsuits Are Being Filed Over Severe Burn Injuries and Fatalities (08/07/2025)