Generic Valsartan Lawsuit Blames Tainted Pills For Lung Cancer And Pancreatic Cancer Diagnoses

|

Following years of exposure to generic valsartan pills that were subsequently recalled, a Kentucky man indicates that he has been left with lung cancer and pancreatic cancer, according to a recently filed product liability lawsuit.

The complaint (PDF) was filed by Jeffrey A. Berryman and his wife, Chitiqua Hocker, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky on May 29, indicating that Camber Pharmaceuticals, Hetero USA, Inc. and The Kroger Company sold defective and unreasonably dangerous generic versions of the blood pressure drug valsartan that were tainted with cancer-causing chemicals

Berryman indicates that he has received generic valsartan pills for treatment of his high blood pressure and heart failure since 2013, including many pills that have been recalled in recent months due to the presence of N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) or N-Nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA), which are believed to be a byproduct of the generic drug manufacturering process.

Valsartan Recall Lawyers for Cancer Claims
Valsartan Recall Lawyers for Cancer Claims

As a result of the exposure to the known human carcinogens, Berryman indicates that he was diagnosed with both lung and pancreatic cancer in September 2017.

The lawsuit indicates that the defendants and other generic drug manufacturers knew for years that their manufacturing processes could result in byproduct contaminants, but did nothing and failed to warn either consumers, the medical community, or drug regulators.

“The pharmaceutical industry has long been aware of the potential for the formation of nitrosamines in pharmaceutical drugs at least as far back as 2005,” Berryman’s lawsuit states. “Defendants Camber and Hetero designed, manufactured, produced, packaged, marketed, distributed, and sold Valsartan contaminated with NDMA and NDEA. Defendant Kroger marketed, packaged, advertised, distributed and sold this contaminated and dangerous Valsartan to patients nationwide.”

Berryman presents claims of manufacturing defect, failure to warn, design defect, negligence, gross negligence, breach of warranty, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, violation of the Kentucky Consumer Protection Act, and his wife is pursuing a claim for loss of consortium. They seek compensatory and punitive damages.

The case joins a growing number of generic valsartan lawsuits filed in recent months by individuals who indicate they were left with a number of other types of cancer, including liver cancer, kidney cancer, bladder cancer, gastric cancer and other injuries following exposure to NDMA or NDEA.

In addition, a number of valsartan class action claims are pursuing damages for users of the medications who have not been diagnosed with cancer, but seek reimbursement for the cost of what were essentially worthless drugs, and funding for medical monitoring they may require for the rest of their lives due to their exposure to cancer-causing agents.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |test caption



1 Comments


K
I definitely agree with the man that claims he has lung cancer from valsartan. My mother was on valsartan for roughly 5-6 years and contracted lung cancer and ultimately died from it. No one would take my case tho. So he is lucky in that regard. Wishing him all the best!

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Federal regulators warned years ago that mesh implants were never approved for use in breast surgery, yet manufacturers continued marketing them as internal bra devices for reconstruction and cosmetic augmentation. As complication reports rise and more women undergo revision surgery, lawsuits are now being investigated against companies that promoted mesh for off-label breast procedures despite FDA warnings and no breast-specific safety data.
A panel of federal judges will decide in December whether to consolidate all claims brought by parents who allege that Roblox facilitated child sexual exploitation into a multidistrict litigation.
A federal judge has called for a second census of Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits and will require prompt filing of census forms for claims filed from October 1 forward.