Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
FDA Warns of Problems with Recalled Phillips HeartStart Defibrillators December 4, 2013 Russell Maas Add Your CommentsGovernment safety officials indicate that roughly 700,000 recalledย HeartStart automated external defibrillators (AED) may be defective and fail to deliver a life-saving shock in the event of an emergency. ย A safety communication was issued by the FDA about a Philips HeartStart defibrillator recall on December 3, even though the devices were removed from the market more than a year ago.The defibrillators were initially recalled because of an internal electric component that may fail and incorrectly indicate the device is ready to use, posing a delay in shock treatment. But the manufacturer has issued a recent warning that the devices may also not deliver the appropriate shock when needed. Although no injuries or deaths have been associated with the delays, this could pose a serious risk in case of emergency.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe HeartStart AEDs analyze the heartโs rhythm in victims going into sudden cardiac arrest, which allows the device to deliver the appropriate electrical shock to restore normal heart rhythm in emergency situations. The devices are used by medical emergency first responders typically in public areas such as airports, schools, community centers, and government buildings.The affected devices were initially recalled by Philips Healthcare in September 2012, when they issued a Voluntary Medical Device Recall for the three AEDs after recognizing the potential electrical component issue. Following the notice, the FDA classified the device recall a Class II recall, indicating the chances of serious adverse health consequences or death due to device failure were remote.At the time of the initial recall, the FDA considered the benefit of attempting to use the AEDs in cardiac emergency circumstances a greater benefit than the risk of not attempting to use the external defibrillator at all.On November 19, Phillips issued a new maintenance advisory, giving updated information about an electrical component that could cause the device to fail to give the appropriate shock, resulting in the FDA safety communication this week.The devices are designed to test themselves regularly to ensure they are ready for use but users should be cautious of a triple chirp sound and a flashing โi-buttonโ as this indicates the machine has a serious problem and could prevent the machine from administering a shock.The potentially affected products included in the warning notice are the Philips HeartStart FRx, HeartStart HS1 Home, and HeartStart HS1 OnSite automated external defibrillators manufactured between 2005 and 2012.In light of that announcement, the FDA reevaluated the risk of harm and sent updated information about the possible electric component failure to consumers with maintenance instructions. According to the agency, the chance of serious adverse health consequences or death directly related to the device malfunctioning is very difficult to conclusively determine.The latest warning notice is advising owners of the affected Philips HeartStart AEDs to contact Philips Healthcare immediately at 1-800-263-3342 and select option 5 to forward the call to an operator for technical support. The warning notice advises all AED customers to keep the recalled devices until Philips replaces the product or until another form of AED is purchased. Written by: Russell MaasManaging Editor & Senior Legal JournalistRussell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Cardiac Arrest, Defibrillator, External Defibrillator, HeartStart, Philips AED Recall Image Credit: |More Lawsuit Stories Depo-Provera Caused Meningioma 29 Years After First Birth Control Shots: Lawsuit May 22, 2026 Roblox Investigation Into Child Exploitation Problems Sought by Advocacy Groups May 22, 2026 Amazon Hand Warmers Lawsuit Claims Defective Products Sparked Fire Leading to Womanโs Death May 22, 2026 0 Comments URLThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Depo-Provera Caused Meningioma 29 Years After First Birth Control Shots: Lawsuit (Posted: yesterday)Pfizer continues to face Depo-Provera lawsuits from across the U.S., including one by a woman who says she learned of her brain tumor nearly 30 years after she stopped receiving the injections.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit Filings Exceed 6,000, As Court Prepares for First Test Trials (05/18/2026)Intracranial Meningioma from Depo-Provera Shots Caused Hearing Loss, Vision Loss: Lawsuit (05/12/2026)Lawsuit Blames Depo Shot for Brain Tumors, Intense Headaches (04/28/2026) Mounjaro NAION Lawsuit Claims Side Effects Led to Permanent Vision Loss (Posted: 2 days ago)A Mounjaro vision loss lawsuit accuses Eli Lilly of failing to properly investigate the drug’s side effects and provide proper warnings before marketing it to the public.MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITOzempic and Mounjaro Drug Class Linked to 35% Higher NAION Vision Loss Risk (05/14/2026)Ozempic Vision Loss Lawsuit Highlights Devastating Consequences of NAION Diagnosis (05/04/2026)GLP-1 Dementia, Alzheimerโs Disease Risks Questioned in New Study (04/27/2026) Suboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (Posted: 3 days ago)According to a recently filed lawsuit, exposure to Suboxone oral film strips caused an Illinois man to suffer severe tooth decay that required extensive dental work.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026)Study Finds No Birth Defect Risks From Suboxone When Compared to Methadone (04/30/2026)Judge Says Suboxone โSchedule Aโ Lawsuits Should Be Filed Individually or Dismissed (04/27/2026)
Amazon Hand Warmers Lawsuit Claims Defective Products Sparked Fire Leading to Womanโs Death May 22, 2026
Depo-Provera Caused Meningioma 29 Years After First Birth Control Shots: Lawsuit (Posted: yesterday)Pfizer continues to face Depo-Provera lawsuits from across the U.S., including one by a woman who says she learned of her brain tumor nearly 30 years after she stopped receiving the injections.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit Filings Exceed 6,000, As Court Prepares for First Test Trials (05/18/2026)Intracranial Meningioma from Depo-Provera Shots Caused Hearing Loss, Vision Loss: Lawsuit (05/12/2026)Lawsuit Blames Depo Shot for Brain Tumors, Intense Headaches (04/28/2026)
Mounjaro NAION Lawsuit Claims Side Effects Led to Permanent Vision Loss (Posted: 2 days ago)A Mounjaro vision loss lawsuit accuses Eli Lilly of failing to properly investigate the drug’s side effects and provide proper warnings before marketing it to the public.MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITOzempic and Mounjaro Drug Class Linked to 35% Higher NAION Vision Loss Risk (05/14/2026)Ozempic Vision Loss Lawsuit Highlights Devastating Consequences of NAION Diagnosis (05/04/2026)GLP-1 Dementia, Alzheimerโs Disease Risks Questioned in New Study (04/27/2026)
Suboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (Posted: 3 days ago)According to a recently filed lawsuit, exposure to Suboxone oral film strips caused an Illinois man to suffer severe tooth decay that required extensive dental work.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026)Study Finds No Birth Defect Risks From Suboxone When Compared to Methadone (04/30/2026)Judge Says Suboxone โSchedule Aโ Lawsuits Should Be Filed Individually or Dismissed (04/27/2026)