Hospital Wrong Site Surgery Problems Results in Fine for Safety Violations

Rhode Island Hospital has to pay $150,000 in state fines and is required to install new monitoring equipment in operating rooms following a violation of safety policies that resulted in surgeons operating on the wrong finger of a patient last month. The surgical mistake was the at least the fifth wrong-site surgery at the hospital since 2007.

Following an investigation by the Rhode Island Health Department, it was determined that the hospital failed to adhere to appropriate standards of medical care, and did not follow a state error-prevention program that went into effect this summer, both of which are designed to prevent doctors from performing surgery on the wrong body part.

State regulators said that the hospital should have properly marked the finger that was to be operated on, and should have had a pause before the surgery to verify that the staff was clear on the procedure and the surgical site. The state’s health director, David R. Gifford, said that the hospital had shown a “pattern of surgical errors” which was unacceptable and needed to be corrected to protect patients.

Did You Know?

AT&T Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

More than 73 million customers of AT&T may have had their names, addresses, phone numbers, Social Security numbers and other information released on the dark web due to a massive AT&T data breach. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

The $150,000 fine is only the second time that the Rhode Island Health Department has fined a hospital in the state, according to the Providence Journal. The other was a $50,000 fine in 2007, which was leveled against the same hospital for problems with wrong-site surgeries.

In addition to the fine, the hospital must install video and audio recording equipment in every operating room, and every surgery performed at the hospital for a year will be done under observation by a licensed clinical professional. The hospital must also perform a day of staff training on wrong site surgery prevention, and adopt statewide surgical safety protocols.

The hospital performed three operations on wrong parts of patients’ brains in 2007, and earlier this year the hospital operated on the wrong side of the mouth of a child with a cleft palate after a surgeon marked the wrong side before surgery.

The hospital had been working with a consulting group to address the problem, and submitted a list of recommendations for wrong site surgery prevention, but hospital officials say that the state rejected those recommendations in favor of its own.

Wrong site surgery is generally considered a “never event,” or a mistake that is inexcusable and should never occur. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons says wrong site surgery is caused by “poor preoperative planning, lack of institutional controls, failure of the surgeon to exercise due care, or a simple mistake in communication between the patient and the surgeon.” The academy notes that 84% of wrong site surgery lawsuits result in payments to plaintiffs, as opposed to 30% of other orthopedic surgery claims.


Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Baby Food Injury Lawyers Appointed To Leadership Roles in Autism, ADHD Lawsuits Over Heavy Metal Contamination
Baby Food Injury Lawyers Appointed To Leadership Roles in Autism, ADHD Lawsuits Over Heavy Metal Contamination (Posted yesterday)

A group of 19 plaintiffs' lawyers have been appointed to serve in various leadership position during the consolidated pretrial proceedings for all baby food injury lawsuits, taking actions that benefit all families pursuing claims for children diagnosed with autism, ADHD or other developmental problems from toxic heavy metals found in many popular products sold in recent years.

Court Allows Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits To Be Filed in Bundled Complaint by June 14, 2024
Court Allows Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits To Be Filed in Bundled Complaint by June 14, 2024 (Posted 4 days ago)

A federal judge is allowing plaintiffs to file large numbers of Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits in one bundled complaint, to meet a potential two-year statute of limitations deadline, with the ability to flesh those claims out in more detail at a later date.