Infant Formula Marketing In Hospitals Breaks International Code: Groups
Nearly two dozen advocacy groups and more than 17,000 consumers banned together for a day of action last week, calling on infant formula manufacturers to follow international guidelines and stop from marketing baby formula to mothers in health care facilities.
The effort was highlighted by the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen on May 21, which was the 33rd anniversary of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) adoption of the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes (WHO Code).
Thousands of breastmilk advocacy groups, mothers and other concerned citizens signed a petition organized by Public Citizen, which calls on baby formula manufacturers to stop advertising their products to mothers in hospitals, clinics and other health care facilities.
The petition was initially sent to Mead Johnson, the maker of Enfamil baby formula and one of the largest and most aggressive formula manufacturers. Public Citizen has plans to send petitions to Abbott, the maker of Similac formula, and Nestle, maker of Gerber Good Start formula, as well.
The event and petition is directed at large marketers of infant formula to call attention to what they say is a continuing unethical practice of promoting formula in health care settings, especially to women who have said they plan to breastfeed.
Large manufacturers, like Mead Johnson and Abbott, often provide free samples of infant formula to women in hospital discharge bags following delivery or at doctor’s visits. These practices are a violation of the WHO Code, critics say.
The petition sent to Mead Johnson headquarters outside of Chicago, IL, carried more than 17,000 signatures. In addition, many other consumers who stand behind the message launched campaigns on social media networks, such as Facebook and Twitter to voice their concern with the practices and send photos and messages to the companies breaking the code.
The movement was spurred to focus attention on the importance breastfeeding plays in the early development and health of an infant and its mother. Studies suggest formula marketing in this manner undermines women’s success of breastfeeding.
The groups say they are not advocating against the use of formula if the use is necessary, instead placing a higher importance on the benefits of breastfeeding.
“Telling women that ‘breast is best’ while distributing formula company materials makes it potentially confusing and difficult for new mothers to make the best decision for themselves and their baby,” said Jennifer Ustianov in Public Citizen press release. Ustianov is a project director of the Best Fed Beginnings, Texas and New York state breastfeeding initiatives at the National Institute for Children’s Health Quality.
The movement also hopes to provide mothers with information which hasn’t been specifically influenced by formula companies. Many complain formula companies use health care outlets to push formula onto new moms.
The U.S. Surgeon General called for stricter enforcement of the WHO code in 2011, requiring designated hospitals to comply with the code.
Many Hospitals Taking Action
Research suggests that by 2007, 27% of hospitals discontinued the practice of offering formula in discharge bags of breastfeeding mothers. By 2011, 45% had ended the practice completely. All hospitals in Massachusetts and Rhode Island voluntarily banned the use of infant formula discharge bags.
Another survey found 82% of U.S. News and World Reports top-ranked hospitals and two-thirds of the highest ranking hospitals in gynecology no longer offered commercial formula discharge bags with samples.
The American Academy of Pediatrics, along with many other health care professionals and organizations, recommend mothers breast feed exclusively for the first six months to offer babies maximum benefits.
Mothers pass on antibodies to infants when nursing; antibodies which may help lower the occurrence of ear infections, respiratory infections, diarrhea, meningitis, sudden infant death syndrome and reduce allergies.
Mothers also benefit from breastfeeding their babies. Researchers have found breastfeeding offers a reduced risk o type 2 diabetes, breast cancer, obesity, ovarian cancer and postpartum depression.
Other sponsors of the initiative are the U.S. Breastfeeding Committee, Best for Babes Foundation, National Women’s Health Network, Our Bodies Ourselves, La Leche League USA, California WIC Association and Breasfeeding coalitions in Chicago, New York, North Carolina and other organizations, among other nationally recognized organizations.
AmaNovember 14, 2016 at 9:29 pm
I am more concerned with the speed at which the formula flows from the nipple. It makes it more difficult to breastfeed a baby. My exprience with my 2nd and 3rd children was that they preferred to suck from the formula nipple than to breastfeed directly from me. It did not matter the contents of the bottle as long as it flowed easily into their mouth. When I switched from the hospital bottled form[Show More]I am more concerned with the speed at which the formula flows from the nipple. It makes it more difficult to breastfeed a baby. My exprience with my 2nd and 3rd children was that they preferred to suck from the formula nipple than to breastfeed directly from me. It did not matter the contents of the bottle as long as it flowed easily into their mouth. When I switched from the hospital bottled formula nipple and started using my own store bought baby bottles they were a bit fussy with their feeding as they did with breastfeeding directly because the flow from these bottles were not as easy and fast as those from the hospital formula bottles. I hope there can be a way in which these companies can be compelled to reduce the flow of milk from the nipple on the formula they provide to mothers in the hospital. I believe the idea behind this fast flow is make it easy for the babies to suck with little effort and then reject any extra effort they have to make in breastfeeding. In my situation I ended up pumping and feeding my children from the bottle since they had less patience to put in the extra effort to nurse and I blame this on the easy flow from the bottle formula provided in the hospital.
"*" indicates required fields
More Top Stories
A Tepezza hearing loss lawsuit accuses the manufacturer of failing to warn doctors to conduct hearing tests, which could have helped a woman avoid permanent hearing damage.
A South Dakota man has filed one of the first gastroparesis lawsuits against Ozempic manufacturers, alleging that users have not been adequately warned about the risk of severe vomiting and long-term stomach side effects.
The U.S. Navy has received more than 129,000 Camp Lejeune water contamination claims, according to court records.