Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Infant Formula Marketing In Hospitals Breaks International Code: Groups May 29, 2014 Martha Garcia Add Your CommentsNearly two dozen advocacy groups and more than 17,000 consumers banned together for a day of action last week, calling on infant formula manufacturers to follow international guidelines and stop from marketing baby formula to mothers in health care facilities. ย The effort was highlightedย by the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen on May 21, which was the 33rd anniversary of the World Health Organizationโs (WHO) adoption of the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes (WHO Code).Thousands of breastmilk advocacy groups, mothers and other concerned citizens signed a petition organized by Public Citizen, which calls on baby formula manufacturers to stop advertising their products to mothers in hospitals, clinics and other health care facilities.BABY FORMULA NEC LAWSUITSWas your premature child fed Similac or Enfamil?Premature infants fed Similac or Enfamil cow’s milk formula face an increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or wrongful death.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONBABY FORMULA NEC LAWSUITSWas your premature child fed Similac or Enfamil?Premature infants fed Similac or Enfamil cow’s milk formula face an increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or wrongful death.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe petition was initially sent to Mead Johnson, the maker of Enfamil baby formula and one of the largest and most aggressive formula manufacturers. Public Citizen hasย plans to send petitions to Abbott, the maker of Similac formula, and Nestle, maker of Gerber Good Start formula, as well.The event and petition is directed at large marketers of infant formula to call attention to what they say is a continuing unethical practice of promoting formula in health care settings, especially to women who have said they plan to breastfeed.Large manufacturers, like Mead Johnson and Abbott, often provide free samples of infant formula to women in hospital discharge bags following delivery or at doctorโs visits. These practices are a violation of the WHO Code, critics say.The petition sent to Mead Johnson headquarters outside of Chicago, IL, carried more than 17,000 signatures. In addition, many other consumers who stand behind the message launched campaigns on social media networks, such as Facebook and Twitter to voice their concern with the practices and send photos and messages to the companies breaking the code.The movement was spurred to focus attention on the importance breastfeeding plays in the early development and health of an infant and its mother. Studies suggest formula marketing in this manner undermines womenโs success of breastfeeding.The groups say they are not advocating against the use of formula if the use is necessary, instead placing a higher importance on the benefits of breastfeeding.โTelling women that โbreast is bestโ while distributing formula company materials makes it potentially confusing and difficult for new mothers to make the best decision for themselves and their baby,โ said Jennifer Ustianov in Public Citizen press release. Ustianov is a project director of the Best Fed Beginnings, Texas and New York state breastfeeding initiatives at the National Institute for Childrenโs Health Quality.The movement also hopes to provide mothers with information which hasnโt been specifically influenced by formula companies. Many complain formula companies use health care outlets to push formula onto new moms.The U.S. Surgeon General called for stricter enforcement of the WHO code in 2011, requiring designated hospitals to comply with the code.Manyย Hospitals Taking ActionResearch suggests that by 2007, 27% of hospitals discontinued the practice of offering formula in discharge bags of breastfeeding mothers. By 2011, 45% had ended the practice completely. All hospitals in Massachusetts and Rhode Island voluntarily banned the use of infant formula discharge bags.Another survey found 82% of U.S. News and World Reports top-ranked hospitals and two-thirds of the highest ranking hospitals in gynecology no longer offered commercial formula discharge bags with samples.The American Academy of Pediatrics, along with many other health care professionals and organizations, recommend mothers breast feed exclusively for the first six months to offer babies maximum benefits.Mothers pass on antibodies to infants when nursing; antibodies which may help lower the occurrence of ear infections, respiratory infections, diarrhea, meningitis, sudden infant death syndrome and reduce allergies.Mothers also benefit from breastfeeding their babies. Researchers have found breastfeeding offers a reduced risk o type 2 diabetes, breast cancer, obesity, ovarian cancer and postpartum depression.Other sponsors of the initiative are the U.S. Breastfeeding Committee, Best for Babes Foundation, National Womenโs Health Network, Our Bodies Ourselves, La Leche League USA, California WIC Association and Breasfeeding coalitions in Chicago, New York, North Carolina and other organizations, among other nationally recognized organizations. Written by: Martha GarciaHealth & Medical Research WriterMartha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers. Tags: Baby Formula, Hospital Image Credit: | Find Out If You Qualify for Infant Formula NEC CompensationMore Baby Formula Lawsuit Stories Mead Johnson Lawsuit Claims Premature Child Developed NEC From Enfamil April 24, 2026 Similac NEC Lawsuit Payout Increased by $17M in Punitive Damages April 14, 2026 $53M Awarded to Families of Babies Who Developed NEC From Similac Special Care Formula April 10, 2026 1 Comments Ama November 14, 2016 I am more concerned with the speed at which the formula flows from the nipple. It makes it more difficult to breastfeed a baby. My exprience with my 2nd and 3rd children was that they preferred to suck from the formula nipple than to breastfeed directly from me. It did not matter the contents of the bottle as long as it flowed easily into their mouth. When I switched from the hospital bottled formula nipple and started using my own store bought baby bottles they were a bit fussy with their feeding as they did with breastfeeding directly because the flow from these bottles were not as easy and fast as those from the hospital formula bottles. I hope there can be a way in which these companies can be compelled to reduce the flow of milk from the nipple on the formula they provide to mothers in the hospital. I believe the idea behind this fast flow is make it easy for the babies to suck with little effort and then reject any extra effort they have to make in breastfeeding. In my situation I ended up pumping and feeding my children from the bottle since they had less patience to put in the extra effort to nurse and I blame this on the easy flow from the bottle formula provided in the hospital. X/TwitterThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Recalled Omnipod 5 Injuries Skyrocket, Prompting Removal of Insulin Pump Pods (Posted: today)Insulet is removing certain Omnipod 5 insulin pump pods from use following a surge in reports of insulin delivery failures that raise risks of diabetic ketoacidosis and other serious complications.MORE ABOUT: OMNIPOD RECALL LAWSUITInsulet OmniPod 5 Recall Lawsuits May Be Filed Over Problems Resulting in Diabetic Ketoacidosis, Hospitalization and Death (03/24/2026)Omnipod 5 Insulin Pump Recall Follows Reports of Serious Injuries: FDA (03/20/2026) Lawsuit Claims Abbott, Boston Scientific SCS Pre-Market Approval Supplements Caused Permanent Injuries (Posted: yesterday)A Florida womanโs lawsuit alleges that Abbott Laboratories and Boston Scientific altered their SCS device batteries, firmware and stimulation features without adequate safety testing approved by the FDA.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITJPML Sets Hearing Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Consolidation for May 28 (04/24/2026)SCS Injury Lawsuit Alleges Unlicensed Abbott Representatives Modified Device After Implantation (04/20/2026)WaveWriter Alpha Lawsuit Claims Defective Spinal Cord Stimulator Caused Pain and Surgical Removal (04/14/2026) Lawsuit Blames Depo Shot for Brain Tumors, Intense Headaches (Posted: 2 days ago)A Depo-Provera lawsuit filed against Pfizer says the manufacturer knew Depo-Provera could stimulate brain tumor growth before the birth control shots hit the market, yet failed to warn doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Meningioma Warning Update Should Be Added to Birth Control Shot: Lawsuit (04/22/2026)Hearings on Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Brain Tumors Set for Late June 2026 (04/15/2026)High-Risk Brain Tumor From Depo-Provera Requires Frequent Monitoring, Lawsuit Claims (04/06/2026)
$53M Awarded to Families of Babies Who Developed NEC From Similac Special Care Formula April 10, 2026
Recalled Omnipod 5 Injuries Skyrocket, Prompting Removal of Insulin Pump Pods (Posted: today)Insulet is removing certain Omnipod 5 insulin pump pods from use following a surge in reports of insulin delivery failures that raise risks of diabetic ketoacidosis and other serious complications.MORE ABOUT: OMNIPOD RECALL LAWSUITInsulet OmniPod 5 Recall Lawsuits May Be Filed Over Problems Resulting in Diabetic Ketoacidosis, Hospitalization and Death (03/24/2026)Omnipod 5 Insulin Pump Recall Follows Reports of Serious Injuries: FDA (03/20/2026)
Lawsuit Claims Abbott, Boston Scientific SCS Pre-Market Approval Supplements Caused Permanent Injuries (Posted: yesterday)A Florida womanโs lawsuit alleges that Abbott Laboratories and Boston Scientific altered their SCS device batteries, firmware and stimulation features without adequate safety testing approved by the FDA.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITJPML Sets Hearing Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Consolidation for May 28 (04/24/2026)SCS Injury Lawsuit Alleges Unlicensed Abbott Representatives Modified Device After Implantation (04/20/2026)WaveWriter Alpha Lawsuit Claims Defective Spinal Cord Stimulator Caused Pain and Surgical Removal (04/14/2026)
Lawsuit Blames Depo Shot for Brain Tumors, Intense Headaches (Posted: 2 days ago)A Depo-Provera lawsuit filed against Pfizer says the manufacturer knew Depo-Provera could stimulate brain tumor growth before the birth control shots hit the market, yet failed to warn doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Meningioma Warning Update Should Be Added to Birth Control Shot: Lawsuit (04/22/2026)Hearings on Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Brain Tumors Set for Late June 2026 (04/15/2026)High-Risk Brain Tumor From Depo-Provera Requires Frequent Monitoring, Lawsuit Claims (04/06/2026)