Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Infant Clinical Trials May Cause Unnecessary Pain: Study October 14, 2015 Martha Garcia Add Your CommentsThe findings of a new report suggest that many babies participating in clinical trials are experiencing unnecessary pain because researchers withhold painkillers, raising serious ethical questions.In a study published last month by the medical journal Acta Paediatrica, Canadian researchers reviewed data on 46 infant clinical trials published from 2013 through June 2015, focusing on studies involving procedural pain.The report indicates that 70% of babies involved in the clinical studies received either a placebo or no pain treatment at all, causing unnecessary pain and discomfort to infants when an established pain treatment was available to soothe them.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONAs a result, the researchers are calling on parents and ethics review boards to reject studies that do not provide available pain relief, regardless of whether they are in a control group, and for medical journals to refuse to publish such studies.Celeste Johnson, lead author of the study and professor at Ingram School of Nursing at McGill University in Montreal, Canada, revealed placebos were used in 64% of studies that involved heel pricks to infants and were also used 85% of the time involving collection of blood from veins. Overall, in just one out of seven procedures where a blood draw occurred was pain relief provided to the control group of babies.Researchers say this is causing unnecessary pain to infants involved in clinical studies, potentially breaching international standards for ethical research, as infants experience pain much more strongly than adults and experience measurable physiological changes, such as increased heart rates, blood pressure rates, drops in blood oxygen and other symptoms.Infant Pain May Be UnderestimatedResearchers revealed nerve pathways help block pain in adults. However, in babies those newer pathways are not fully developed and the receptive fields of nerve cells processing sensory information are significantlyย larger than in adults. So to an infant, a small heel prick may hurt up to the knee.In fact, some studies suggest that these small heel pokes or body pricks may cause severe pain in babies, ranging from 5.4 to 6.4 on the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale. On this scale 0 is no pain and 7 is the highest level of pain an infant can feel.In clinical trials, typically half of the group gets treatment and half the group gets a placebo to compare outcomes of the treatment. The majority of the studies involved heel pokes or skin pricks, noting the pain as minor, when instead it may be quite painful for a baby to be pricked, researchers noted.Researchers note that there are easy ways to ease a babyโs pain, including simple analgesic creams, breastfeeding, as well as a few drops of sugar water and skin to skin contact.Often the reason researchers withhold pain relief to show a new intervention, drug or other measure is better than offering nothing, researchers said. It is more difficult to show that the intervention is better than an established and proven pain reliever.Parents often consent in these cases because the baby has a 50% chance of getting the pain reliever, offering them hope. They may also be unaware these small procedures cause infants extreme, undue pain, according to the researchers.Johnson and her team believe it is unethical to withhold established pain treatment to infants in clinical trial, citing the Declaration of Helsinki.The declaration is a set of ethical principles used to guide research worldwide, requiring researchers to use the best and current proven intervention in the control group. Only in cases where compelling and scientifically sound methodological reasons are given for the use of a placebo can it be used in the study.Researchers are urging ethical review boards to refuse to publish studies that do not provide acceptable pain relief to all babies on the grounds it causes unnecessary and extremely high levels of pain. They are also calling on medical journals to refuse to publish studies that deny pain relief to infants in control groups undergoing painful procedures. Written by: Martha GarciaHealth & Medical Research WriterMartha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers. Tags: Childrens Drugs, Clinical TrialsMore Lawsuit Stories Suboxone Dry Mouth Lawsuit Claims Dental Problems Could Have Been Avoided With Sublocade Shot June 18, 2026 Meta Faces Lawsuit Over Sports Betting Ads on Facebook, Instagram June 18, 2026 Nexgrill Class Action Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Botched Grill Brush Recall June 18, 2026 0 Comments LinkedInThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Suboxone Dry Mouth Lawsuit Claims Dental Problems Could Have Been Avoided With Sublocade Shot (Posted: today)Five plaintiffs say they all suffered dental problems due to the side effects of Suboxone, which could have been avoided with adequate warnings.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (06/11/2026)Suboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (05/20/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026) Lawsuit Claims Dupixent Cancer Diagnosis Occurred After Only 8 Months of Use (Posted: yesterday)The makers of Dupixent face a CTCL lawsuit by a man who says he developed the rare form of cancer less than a year after beginning treatment with the eczema drug.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITRezurock Lawsuit Claims GVHD Medication Caused Debilitating Skin Condition, Prurigo Nodularis (06/12/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuits Consolidated in MDL Over CTCL Diagnoses (06/09/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (06/04/2026) Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Led to Repeat Surgeries, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: 2 days ago)Four plaintiffs allege Abbott spinal cord stimulator battery problems, painful malfunctions and other device failures caused worsening symptoms and repeat surgeries after the company made hundreds of changes to its implant systems.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (06/12/2026)Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)
Suboxone Dry Mouth Lawsuit Claims Dental Problems Could Have Been Avoided With Sublocade Shot June 18, 2026
Suboxone Dry Mouth Lawsuit Claims Dental Problems Could Have Been Avoided With Sublocade Shot (Posted: today)Five plaintiffs say they all suffered dental problems due to the side effects of Suboxone, which could have been avoided with adequate warnings.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (06/11/2026)Suboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (05/20/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026)
Lawsuit Claims Dupixent Cancer Diagnosis Occurred After Only 8 Months of Use (Posted: yesterday)The makers of Dupixent face a CTCL lawsuit by a man who says he developed the rare form of cancer less than a year after beginning treatment with the eczema drug.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITRezurock Lawsuit Claims GVHD Medication Caused Debilitating Skin Condition, Prurigo Nodularis (06/12/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuits Consolidated in MDL Over CTCL Diagnoses (06/09/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (06/04/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Led to Repeat Surgeries, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: 2 days ago)Four plaintiffs allege Abbott spinal cord stimulator battery problems, painful malfunctions and other device failures caused worsening symptoms and repeat surgeries after the company made hundreds of changes to its implant systems.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (06/12/2026)Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)