Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Coating on Intravascular Devices May Peel Off, Causing Injury and Death, FDA Warns November 24, 2015 Russell Maas Add Your CommentsGovernment health officials have issued a warning about the potential dangers associated with use of intravascular devices with hydrophilic or hydrophobic lubricious coatings, after data suggest there may be over 500 incidents of coating separations resulting in injuries and at least nine deaths since 2014.ย The FDA issued a safety communication on intravascular medical devices on November 23, warning healthcare professionals using coated intravascular medical devices on patients to be aware of the potential for the coating to separate from the device.Incidents of coating separation have been linked to serious adverse health consequences, including blockage of blood vessels, heart attacks, strokes, and death.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe intravascular devices, include intravascular catheters, guidewires, balloon angioplasty catheters, delivery sheaths and implant delivery systems, are typically used during minimally invasive surgeries on cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, and peripheral vascular systems. Many of these devices are covered in a hydrophilic or hydrophobic lubricious coating to reduce the friction between the devices and the blood vessels.The coatings allow for greater maneuverability by the physician and have been determined to cause fewer traumas to the blood vessels. However, a recent analysis of FDA adverse event reports found hundreds of incidents involving injuries and death that were caused by the separation of device coating during procedures.The FDA warns that the coating could separate from the device by means of peeling, flaking, shedding, delaminating, or sloughing off, leaving remains inside the blood vessels of the patient. The coating separations could occur for a number of reasons; including patientโs anatomy, physicianโs technique, improper storage, use of the wrong device or a device defect from the manufacturer.FDA investigators found more than 500 incidents of coating separation on intravascular medical devices since January 1, 2014. According to the FDA, the majority of incident reports involved coated guidewires and resulted in a range of serious and life threatening injuries. Of the 500 reported incidents, researchers found a wide variety of injuries including pulmonary embolism, pulmonary infarction, myocardial embolism, myocardial infarction, embolic stroke, and tissue necrosis.A total of eleven deaths were reported, although investigators decided that two of the deaths were not linked to coating separation. However, the remaining nine deaths involved situations that included embolization of separated device coatings that caused severe blood vessel occlusion during brain and heart catheterizations. Although the reports have not determined the deaths to be directly cause by the embolization of particles, the separated pieces ultimately contributed to the fatal heart attacks and brain bleeds.Over the last five years there have been at least 11 recalls of medical devices equipped with coatings that reportedly peeled or flaked of the of the devices during use.Despite the injuries and recalls, the FDA warning indicates that the agency still believes the benefit of the coated devices outweighs the risks, and that without these devices, some patients may be forced to undergo more extensive and invasive surgeries which tend to have longer recoveries and put patients at more risk of infections.The FDAโs warning does not indicate any specific manufacturerโs product is better or safer to use than anotherโs, but does suggest that healthcare professionals take into consideration the purpose of the device used, storage and labeling information of devices, execution of multiple devices together, and pre- and post-surgery monitoring of patients before taking action. Written by: Russell MaasManaging Editor & Senior Legal JournalistRussell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Catheter, Medical Device, Particulate Matter, Pulmonary EmbolismMore Lawsuit Stories Port Catheter Sepsis Lawsuit Claims Defective SmartPort Implant Caused Infection July 22, 2026 Sapien 3 TAVR Lawsuit Claims Valve Caused Iliac Artery Perforation, Wrongful Death July 22, 2026 Amazon Faces Lawsuit Claiming Defective Telescopic Ladder Caused Severe Injuries July 22, 2026 0 Comments CompanyThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (Posted: yesterday)A Dupixent cancer lawsuit claims the manufacturers failed to adequately test and label the eczema treatment, resulting in a CTCL cancer diagnosis.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent MDL Judge To Meet With Lawyers for Initial Case Management Conference in October 2026 (06/25/2026)Lawsuit Claims Dupixent Cancer Diagnosis Occurred After Only 8 Months of Use (06/17/2026)Rezurock Lawsuit Claims GVHD Medication Caused Debilitating Skin Condition, Prurigo Nodularis (06/12/2026) Fourth Uber Driver Sex Assault Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Set for Oct. 2026 (Posted: 2 days ago)A federal judge has scheduled the fourth bellwether trial involving claims that Uber failed to protect passengers from being sexually assaulted by its drivers for early October.MORE ABOUT: UBER SEXUAL ASSAULT LAWSUITUber Faces Investor Lawsuit Over Failure To Stop Driver Sexual Assaults (07/13/2026)Uber Sexual Assault Lawyers To Meet With MDL Judge Next Week, in Advance of Upcoming Trial (06/26/2026)Lyft Rideshare Assault Lawsuit Alleges Company Attempts To Silence Attack Victims (06/15/2026) Bard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (Posted: 5 days ago)Plaintiffs and defendants have submitted a joint schedule for a final pretrial conference before the second Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial over claims the port catheter is defectively designed.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITNew Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit (06/05/2026)Bard PowerPort Fracture Lawsuit Set For Second Bellwether Trial in Aug. 2026 (05/29/2026)Jury Returns Defense Verdict in First Bard PowerPort Injury Lawsuit (05/11/2026)
Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (Posted: yesterday)A Dupixent cancer lawsuit claims the manufacturers failed to adequately test and label the eczema treatment, resulting in a CTCL cancer diagnosis.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent MDL Judge To Meet With Lawyers for Initial Case Management Conference in October 2026 (06/25/2026)Lawsuit Claims Dupixent Cancer Diagnosis Occurred After Only 8 Months of Use (06/17/2026)Rezurock Lawsuit Claims GVHD Medication Caused Debilitating Skin Condition, Prurigo Nodularis (06/12/2026)
Fourth Uber Driver Sex Assault Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Set for Oct. 2026 (Posted: 2 days ago)A federal judge has scheduled the fourth bellwether trial involving claims that Uber failed to protect passengers from being sexually assaulted by its drivers for early October.MORE ABOUT: UBER SEXUAL ASSAULT LAWSUITUber Faces Investor Lawsuit Over Failure To Stop Driver Sexual Assaults (07/13/2026)Uber Sexual Assault Lawyers To Meet With MDL Judge Next Week, in Advance of Upcoming Trial (06/26/2026)Lyft Rideshare Assault Lawsuit Alleges Company Attempts To Silence Attack Victims (06/15/2026)
Bard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (Posted: 5 days ago)Plaintiffs and defendants have submitted a joint schedule for a final pretrial conference before the second Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial over claims the port catheter is defectively designed.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITNew Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit (06/05/2026)Bard PowerPort Fracture Lawsuit Set For Second Bellwether Trial in Aug. 2026 (05/29/2026)Jury Returns Defense Verdict in First Bard PowerPort Injury Lawsuit (05/11/2026)