Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
Johnson & Johnson Metal Hip Lawsuit Results in Defense Verdict October 24, 2014 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments The first federal bellwether trial for a DePuy Pinnacle metal-on-metal hip lawsuit has ended in a defense verdict for Johnson & Johnson, following several weeks of testimony and three days of jury deliberations. A federal jury in Texas rejected failure to warn, defective design and negligence claims brought by Kathleen Herlihy-Paoli, whose claim was selected as the first in a series of DePuy Pinnacle trials scheduled in the federal court system to help the parties gauge how juries may respond to certain evidence and testimony that may be repeated throughout thousands of similar lawsuits pending nationwide. Herlihy-Paoli received the Johnson & Johnson metal hip implant on both sides in 2009, and alleged that she subsequently suffered complications that were caused by the metal-on-metal design. However, attorneys for Johnson & Johnson and their DePuy Orthopaedics subsidiary argued at trial that her implant was improperly positioned by the surgeon, which they maintained was the ultimate cause of her complications and the need to have the artificial hip removed. Learn More About DePuy ASR Hip Lawsuits Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Learn More About DePuy ASR Hip Lawsuits Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION DePuy Pinnacle Hip Litigation The trial was the first out of more than 6,500 DePuy Pinnacle hip lawsuits to go before a jury, which all involve similar arguments that the implants failed due to metallic poisoning associated with the release of microscopic metal debris as the components rub against each other during normal use. Plaintiffs maintain that Johnson & Johnson failed to adequately warn consumers and the medical community of the risk of problems with metal-on-metal hip replacements, and that the DePuy Pinnacle hip system was defectively designed, making implants prone to fail within just a few years. During the trial, attorneys for Herlihy-Paoli told the jury that Johnson & Johnson aggressively over-marketed the DePuy Pinnacle metal hip replacements, lied about complication rates associated with the metal-on-metal design and failed to warn people that they were being used as “guinea pigs.” Following nearly two-months of trial in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, where all Johnson & Johnson metal hip lawsuits involving the Pinnacle design are centralized as part of a Multi-District Litigation (MDL), the jury determined that Herlihy-Paoli failed to meet the burden of proof based on the circumstances surrounding her case. While all of the cases involved in the DePuy Pinnacle litigation raise similar litigation, outcomes of various trials are expected to differ based on the individual circumstances in each case. The Herlihy-Paoli trial was the first in a series of three bellwether trials set to begin involving individuals who had one of the Johnson & Johnson metal hips fail, with additional trials set to begin on November 3, 2014 and January 12, 2015. The outcomes of these bellwether trials are not binding in any other cases, but may influence potential hip replacement settlements that may be reached by Johnson & Johnson to resolve DePuy Pinnacle claims. Johnson & Johnson Hip Settlements The Pinnacle bellwether trial began shortly after Johnson & Johnson agreed to pay at least $2.4 billion to settle DePuy ASR hip lawsuits, resolving thousands of similar claims involving a different metal-on-metal hip that was approved as a “substantial equivalent” to the Pinnacle metal design. A DePuy ASR recall was issued in August 2010, after the manufacturer acknowledged that the implant carried a higher-than-expected rate of failures. More than 12,000 lawsuits over DePuy ASR hips were filed nationwide before the settlement, and the agreement was only reached after a number of cases went to trial, with conflicting results. Despite the DePuy ASR settlement, Johnson & Johnson has maintained that it intends to defend the safety of the Pinnacle implant at trial. However, early evidence in the Herlihy-Paoli trial suggests that the manufacturer knew about the risk of metal poisoning with Pinnacle hips as early as 2001, ignoring recommendations that the implants be tested to see whether they release metal debris into the bloodstream. Other manufacturers of metal-on-metal implants face similar allegations that they failed to adequately research the design or warn about the risk of problems. Additional MDLs have been established in the federal court system for Biomet M2A Magnum metal hip lawsuits and Wright Medical Conserve Cup metal hip lawsuits. In January 2013, the FDA released new guidance for metal-on-metal hip replacements, indicating that doctors should only use the design if other artificial hip implants are not appropriate. The agency also determined that future metal-on-metal hip designs will be required to undergo extensive human clinical trials before they will be approved. Tags: DePuy Pinnacle Hip, Johnson & Johnson, Metal-on-Metal Hip Implant More DePuy ASR Hip Lawsuit Stories Biomet Hip Lawsuit Filed Over Defective M2A Metal-on-Metal Implant December 26, 2024 Zimmer Biomet Lawsuit Filed Over RibFix Blu Implant Fracture September 25, 2024 Zimmer Biomet CPT Hip System Linked to Increased Risk of Thigh Bone Fractures, FDA Warns September 18, 2024 2 Comments JOSEPH December 12, 2024 HOW DO THEY FIX MY HIP?? I GOT IT IN 2005 BEEN BAD EVER SINCE. Kathleen October 25, 2014 I think they picked the wrong kind of case to present. I had the pinnacle put in Dec.2007. My recovery seemed to be going great. After 4 months I tried going back to my job full-time as a letter carrier. Instead of any improvement, I just kept having more pain. I kept going to the doctor and telling him something was wrong. Went through the blood test. OK. They did a bone scan, said in conclusive. By Oct I told doctor You got to do something. I am going to loose my career, my house , everything. I hadn’t worked since July because he came up with the theory, no weight bearing for 8 weeks. The post office wouldn’t let me work even light duty. I went without pay for months. Finally had re vision surgery. The doctor said stem was just hanging there loose. It hadn’t attached at all. I had all the symptoms they keep describing. The groin and thigh pain. The more I moved the more it hurt. I had had a hip replacement in 2003 on my left hip. No problem what so ever. It was a DePuy product, but no metal liner. I expected no problem this time. But I sure was wrong. I had immediate failure. My doctor told me he had another patient that was presenting same symptoms as mine and had scheduled him for revision surgery, and was so sorry for putting me off for so long. My replacement was in 2007. My revision 2008. Already product failing right away. Why still putting in people even years later. This all really pisses me off. Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermCommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Breast Cancer Survivors File BioZorb Tissue Marker Lawsuit After Implant Fails (Posted: today) Six women have filed a joint, multiplaintiff BioZorb tissue marker lawsuit, all indicating that they suffered injuries and complications due to the recalled device’s defective design. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITBioZorb Implant Lawsuit Alleges Tissue Marker Caused Swelling, Fluid Buildup and Chronic Pain (05/14/2025)Four Women File BioZorb Lawsuit Over Breast Tissue Marker Failures and Injuries (05/05/2025)Lawsuit Claims BioZorb Marker Caused Chronic Pain, Multiple Surgeries After Lumpectomy (04/14/2025) 6 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Selected for Bellwether Trials in Federal MDL (Posted: yesterday) A federal judge has identified the six Bard PowerPort lawsuits that will serve as the first bellwether trials, to test allegations that the port catheters were defectively designed. MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITCourt Indicates Bard PowerPort MDL Bellwether Lawsuits Should Include 3 Infection, 2 Thrombosis and 1 Fracture Case (05/06/2025)Lawyers Proposed 11 Bard Implantable Port Catheter Lawsuits as Bellwether Trial Candidates (04/30/2025)Bard PowerPICC Intravascular Catheter Leaks Linked to Reports of Serious Injuries: FDA (04/21/2025) MDL Judge Orders Paraquat Lawsuit Settlement Update By June 11, 2025 (Posted: 4 days ago) A federal judge has agreed to stay all case-specific discovery deadlines in Paraquat lawsuits, while the parties work to hammer out a settlement agreement to resolve thousands of claims. MORE ABOUT: PARAQUAT PARKINSON’S DISEASE LAWSUITSParaquat Settlement Reached for Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Filed in MDL (04/16/2025)Appeals Court Urged To Reinstate Paraquat Lawsuits Previously Set for Bellwether Trials (02/14/2025)Paraquat Lawsuits Over Parkinson’s Disease Risk Set for Trial in October 2025, April 2026 (01/29/2025)
Zimmer Biomet CPT Hip System Linked to Increased Risk of Thigh Bone Fractures, FDA Warns September 18, 2024
Breast Cancer Survivors File BioZorb Tissue Marker Lawsuit After Implant Fails (Posted: today) Six women have filed a joint, multiplaintiff BioZorb tissue marker lawsuit, all indicating that they suffered injuries and complications due to the recalled device’s defective design. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITBioZorb Implant Lawsuit Alleges Tissue Marker Caused Swelling, Fluid Buildup and Chronic Pain (05/14/2025)Four Women File BioZorb Lawsuit Over Breast Tissue Marker Failures and Injuries (05/05/2025)Lawsuit Claims BioZorb Marker Caused Chronic Pain, Multiple Surgeries After Lumpectomy (04/14/2025)
6 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Selected for Bellwether Trials in Federal MDL (Posted: yesterday) A federal judge has identified the six Bard PowerPort lawsuits that will serve as the first bellwether trials, to test allegations that the port catheters were defectively designed. MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITCourt Indicates Bard PowerPort MDL Bellwether Lawsuits Should Include 3 Infection, 2 Thrombosis and 1 Fracture Case (05/06/2025)Lawyers Proposed 11 Bard Implantable Port Catheter Lawsuits as Bellwether Trial Candidates (04/30/2025)Bard PowerPICC Intravascular Catheter Leaks Linked to Reports of Serious Injuries: FDA (04/21/2025)
MDL Judge Orders Paraquat Lawsuit Settlement Update By June 11, 2025 (Posted: 4 days ago) A federal judge has agreed to stay all case-specific discovery deadlines in Paraquat lawsuits, while the parties work to hammer out a settlement agreement to resolve thousands of claims. MORE ABOUT: PARAQUAT PARKINSON’S DISEASE LAWSUITSParaquat Settlement Reached for Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Filed in MDL (04/16/2025)Appeals Court Urged To Reinstate Paraquat Lawsuits Previously Set for Bellwether Trials (02/14/2025)Paraquat Lawsuits Over Parkinson’s Disease Risk Set for Trial in October 2025, April 2026 (01/29/2025)