Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
“Just For Men” Hair Dye Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Skin Irritation, Allergic Reactions July 10, 2019 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsA class action lawsuit has been filed against the makers of โJust For Menโ hair dye products, seeking compensation for anyone who suffered skin irritation, burns, allergic reactions or other injuries within 96 hours of application.The complaint (PDF) was filed earlier this month in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by Ray Du Boc Ali, Izell McCloud, and Clemon Williams, seeking class action status to pursue damages against the manufacturer, Combe Incorporated.All three men suffered severe, painful reactions which led to permanent skin discoloration, blisters and other side effects. As a result of the “Just for Men” hair dye reactions, all three indicate that they have been permanently disfigured and scarred.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe lawsuit indicate that “Just For Men” according to FDA rules, an allergy test described on the packaging, which is recommended to test the product on the skin for at least 48 hours, classifies the hair dye as an unadulterated drug.โDefendants impose upon consumers, with no training, no guide for interpretation, no control over the amount, area or actual extent of product exposure, an inadequate observation time, and no negative control for comparison, the responsibility for determining whether they are having a reaction to the product. Further Defendants do not instruct consumers to consult their physician if they experience the listed symptoms during the 48 hour allergy test,โ the lawsuit states. โDefendants also fail to instruct consumers to discontinue the use of systemic antihistamines, cyclosporines and oral steroids several days prior to conducting the open allergy test because use of these medications could cause a false negative result. Moreover, even if such a warning were made, many consumers are unlikely to recognize whether the drugs they are taking belong to these pharmaceutical classes, or further it may not be safe for them to discontinue these medications.โThe “Just for Men” lawsuit claims that the problems come from the use of a chemical known as p-phenylenediamine (PPD), which has been known to be an irritant and cause serious injuries since the 1930s. Darker dyes contain more PPD than other types, which results in men of color being more susceptible to irritation and allergic reactions due to the higher amounts of the chemical in products targeted at them, according to the lawsuit.Just For Men RisksThe concerns aboutย reports of Just for Men allergic reactionsย gained nationwide attention following a 2012 report by ConsumerAffairs.com, which noted that it was receiving a number of new complaints involving skin irritation, itching, blisters and chemical burns following Just for Men application.Consumer Affairs has received more than 400 reports ofย burns or allergic reactions to โJust for Menโ since the group first warned about the risk of allergic reactions in 2012.Many of the men report using Just for Men dye for years without any issues, which some some suggest may raise questions about whether the manufacturerโs suggestion that users do a โpatch testโ on a small part of the body may be useless.Additionalย Just For Men lawsuitsย are likely to be filed in the coming months, as a number of individuals throughout the U.S. have already contacted lawyers after suffering injuries that were reportedly caused by the hair and beard dye. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Allergic Reaction, Burns, Chemicals, Class Action Lawsuit, Combe, Just For Men, Skin ReactionsMore Just for Men Lawsuit Stories Class Action Lawsuit for “Just for Men” Hair Dye Medical Monitoring Dismissed November 22, 2016 Just for Men Lawsuits Filed Over Risks Associated with Hair and Beard Dye February 22, 2016 Just for Men Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Burns, Allergic Reactions January 26, 2016 51 Comments Ryan July 14, 2019 I’ve been using the product now 1 year I’ve noticed that I’ve gotten blisters on the side of my chin about four times I never related it to just for men but now it all makes senseNewer Comments 1 2 URLThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES JPML Sets Hearing Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Consolidation for May 28 (Posted: 3 days ago)In late May, a panel of federal judges will hold oral arguments over whether all federal spinal cord stimulator lawsuits should be consolidated before one judge for pretrial proceedings.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITSCS Injury Lawsuit Alleges Unlicensed Abbott Representatives Modified Device After Implantation (04/20/2026)WaveWriter Alpha Lawsuit Claims Defective Spinal Cord Stimulator Caused Pain and Surgical Removal (04/14/2026)Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Exacerbated Chronic Pain (04/08/2026) Fire Pit Burn Lawsuits Mount as CPSC Issues Warning Over New Flame Jetting Injuries, Death (Posted: 4 days ago)As the number of lawsuits over tabletop fire pits continues to grow, the CPSC has issued a warning indicating that despite a consumerโs death linked to one product, the manufacturer has not agreed to remove the devices from the market.MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITKizzby Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Claims Alcohol-Fueled Bowl Exploded, Igniting Womanโs Hand (04/01/2026)Flame Jetting Lawsuit Claims Amazon Tabletop Fire Pit Erupted, Caused Severe Burns (03/19/2026)Brookstone Fire Pit Lawsuit Filed After Woman Suffers Second, Third Degree Burns (01/19/2026) Depo-Provera Meningioma Warning Update Should Be Added to Birth Control Shot: Lawsuit (Posted: 5 days ago)A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit argues that Pfizer had a duty to warn women about scientific evidence linking the birth control shot to potential brain tumor growth yet failed to do so.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITHearings on Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Brain Tumors Set for Late June 2026 (04/15/2026)High-Risk Brain Tumor From Depo-Provera Requires Frequent Monitoring, Lawsuit Claims (04/06/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (03/25/2026)
JPML Sets Hearing Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Consolidation for May 28 (Posted: 3 days ago)In late May, a panel of federal judges will hold oral arguments over whether all federal spinal cord stimulator lawsuits should be consolidated before one judge for pretrial proceedings.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITSCS Injury Lawsuit Alleges Unlicensed Abbott Representatives Modified Device After Implantation (04/20/2026)WaveWriter Alpha Lawsuit Claims Defective Spinal Cord Stimulator Caused Pain and Surgical Removal (04/14/2026)Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Exacerbated Chronic Pain (04/08/2026)
Fire Pit Burn Lawsuits Mount as CPSC Issues Warning Over New Flame Jetting Injuries, Death (Posted: 4 days ago)As the number of lawsuits over tabletop fire pits continues to grow, the CPSC has issued a warning indicating that despite a consumerโs death linked to one product, the manufacturer has not agreed to remove the devices from the market.MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITKizzby Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Claims Alcohol-Fueled Bowl Exploded, Igniting Womanโs Hand (04/01/2026)Flame Jetting Lawsuit Claims Amazon Tabletop Fire Pit Erupted, Caused Severe Burns (03/19/2026)Brookstone Fire Pit Lawsuit Filed After Woman Suffers Second, Third Degree Burns (01/19/2026)
Depo-Provera Meningioma Warning Update Should Be Added to Birth Control Shot: Lawsuit (Posted: 5 days ago)A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit argues that Pfizer had a duty to warn women about scientific evidence linking the birth control shot to potential brain tumor growth yet failed to do so.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITHearings on Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Brain Tumors Set for Late June 2026 (04/15/2026)High-Risk Brain Tumor From Depo-Provera Requires Frequent Monitoring, Lawsuit Claims (04/06/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (03/25/2026)