Lasik Risks Must be Disclosed in Advertisements Warns FDA
The FDA has notified healthcare providers that any advertisements for laser eye surgery procedures must adequately disclose the possible risks of Lasik, as many patients have reported suffering blurry vision, double vision and other eye problems.
The warning comes in the wake of FDA hearings held in April 2008 that addressed many of the Lasik risks and complaints of former patients who experienced problems after Lasik eye surgery.
LASIK (laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis) is a form of corrective eye surgery that uses a laser to improve a patient’s vision and reduce their need to wear glasses or contact lenses.
Did You Know?
Millions of Philips CPAP Machines Recalled
Philips DreamStation, CPAP and BiPAP machines sold in recent years may pose a risk of cancer, lung damage and other injuries.Learn More
During the eye surgery, a surgical instrument known as a microkeratome is used to cut through the top layers of the cornea to create a flap. A laser beam is then used to reshape the cornea for vision correction and the corneal flap is replaced.
“The FDA has received complaints that eye care professionals’ advertisements for LASIK procedures and FDA-approved lasers used for the LASIK procedures failed to inform consumers of the indications, limitations, and risks associated with LASIK procedures and the approved lasers used for the LASIK procedures,” the FDA letter states.
The FDA has set up a special section of its website for consumers about potential problems with LASIK and other information to help consumers make a decision about whether the procedure is right for them.
According to the information posted by the FDA, the following Lasik risks should be considered before undergoing corrective eye surgery:
- Vision loss that cannot be corrected with glasses, contact lenses or additional surgery
- Debilitating visual symptoms such as glare, halo and/or double vision that can seriously effect vision at night or in fog
- Undertreatment or overtreatment may result in a failure to achieve 20/20 vision, and additional treatment may not be possible. Therefore, patients may still require glasses or contact lenses after srugery.
- Dry eye syndrome may occur, which could prevent the eye from developing enough tears, causing discomfort and reduced visual quality.
- Results are generally not as good in patients with very large refractive errors.
- Results may diminish with age for some farsighted patients.
- Long-term data is not available, as the first laser was approved for LASIK eye surgery in 1998.
The known risks of Lasik surgery have, so far, not been included in most advertisement, critics argue. Additionally, a 2008 American Journal of Ophthalmology report found that additional surgeries were needed for 28% of the eyes treated with LASIK less than 10 years after the initial surgery, due to undercorrection, overcorrection, or regression.
Lasik surgery malpractice lawsuits have been brought against eye surgeons for failing to follow the appropriate standard of care, most commonly for problems that develop after a doctor fails to properly screen a patient out as a potential candidate for the eye surgery.
ScottMay 28, 2009 at 12:28 am
I had LASIK performed on my in 1997. At that time and through my entire malpractice lawsuit that I intiated, I was never made aware of the fact that lasers were not even approved for LASIK at that time. My case alleged that I was never a candidate for the surgery, and that he did a bad job, and failed to provide proper informed consent regarding the risks given my high degree of myopia, astigmas[Show More]I had LASIK performed on my in 1997. At that time and through my entire malpractice lawsuit that I intiated, I was never made aware of the fact that lasers were not even approved for LASIK at that time. My case alleged that I was never a candidate for the surgery, and that he did a bad job, and failed to provide proper informed consent regarding the risks given my high degree of myopia, astigmastism, night blindness, and nystagmus. Now I find out that I was his lab rat! He assaulted me with a laser that was not approved for LASIK. He misrepresented this to me. Can't he be charged criminally? Is there another type of case I could bring against him this many years later. I only found out about this during within the last 2 months. I'm outraged, and my vision is something you wouln't wish on your worst enemy. Is there any justice for me and my family, who have suffered great losses.
"*" indicates required fields
More Top Stories
Plaintiffs have filed a motion opposing efforts by the U.S. government to block jury trials for those who have filed Camp Lejeune water lawsuits.
A federal judge has laid out the selection and discovery process for the first Bard PowerPort lawsuits to go before juries.
A group of plaintiffs have asked a panel of federal judges to consolidate all lawsuits over Ozempic, Wegovy and Mounjaro stomach paralysis injuries before one judge for pretrial procedures.