Lawsuit Over Baby Food Lead Levels Goes to Trial in California

Trial started this week in California state for a lawsuit that may decide whether food producers will be required to add information about baby food lead levels in California. 

The Environmental Law Foundation is pursuing a lawsuit in Alameda County Superior Court that claims companies should be required to tell parents how much lead is in baby food.

The case alleges that a number of major food manufacturers, including Gerber Products Co., Del Monte Foods and others, are in violation of an existing California law by not providing the information.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

The law in question is California Proposition 65, which according to the original complaint (PDF) “requires businesses to warn California consumers before exposing them to chemicals that cause birth defects or cancer.” The lawsuit notes that in 1987, California Governor George Deukmejian declared that lead is subject to Proposition 65 because it is a reproductive toxicant. California Pete Wilson made a similar declaration in 1992, declaring lead and lead compounds to be carcinogens.

“There is no safe level of lead for children,” the lawsuit states. “Moreover, infants and fetuses are at the greatest risk of harmful effects from lead exposure. Fetuses who are exposed to lead in the womb may be born prematurely and have lower weights at birth.”

The Environmental Law Foundation published a list of baby food products (PDF) sold in the state should fall under Proposition 65.

Lead poisoning for children can result in nervous system injury, brain damage, seizures or convulsions, growth or mental retardation, coma and even death for young children.

The case begins just days after the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released a report that estimates that more than rhalf a million children ages 1-5 in the U.S. have levels of lead in the blood that are considered dangerous.

The trial is being overseen by Judge Steven Brick, who will issue a ruling after hearing expert testimony and arguments.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A newly published case report describes a rare Bard port catheter fracture that occurred just six months after implantation, allowing a broken fragment to migrate into a patient’s pulmonary artery and requiring an additional medical procedure for removal.
As FanDuel and other sportsbooks push parlay betting and social gambling features ahead of major events like the Super Bowl, lawsuits are being investigated over whether these high-risk products fueled gambling addiction and financial harm among young users.
A nitrous oxide lawsuit filed against Amazon and other manufacturers and distributors alleges the defendants knowingly sold nitrous oxide canisters for illegal recreational use without adequate warnings, and in violation of state and federal laws.