Lawsuit Over Baby Food Lead Levels Goes to Trial in California

Trial started this week in California state for a lawsuit that may decide whether food producers will be required to add information about baby food lead levels in California. 

The Environmental Law Foundation is pursuing a lawsuit in Alameda County Superior Court that claims companies should be required to tell parents how much lead is in baby food.

The case alleges that a number of major food manufacturers, including Gerber Products Co., Del Monte Foods and others, are in violation of an existing California law by not providing the information.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

The law in question is California Proposition 65, which according to the original complaint (PDF) “requires businesses to warn California consumers before exposing them to chemicals that cause birth defects or cancer.” The lawsuit notes that in 1987, California Governor George Deukmejian declared that lead is subject to Proposition 65 because it is a reproductive toxicant. California Pete Wilson made a similar declaration in 1992, declaring lead and lead compounds to be carcinogens.

“There is no safe level of lead for children,” the lawsuit states. “Moreover, infants and fetuses are at the greatest risk of harmful effects from lead exposure. Fetuses who are exposed to lead in the womb may be born prematurely and have lower weights at birth.”

The Environmental Law Foundation published a list of baby food products (PDF) sold in the state should fall under Proposition 65.

Lead poisoning for children can result in nervous system injury, brain damage, seizures or convulsions, growth or mental retardation, coma and even death for young children.

The case begins just days after the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released a report that estimates that more than rhalf a million children ages 1-5 in the U.S. have levels of lead in the blood that are considered dangerous.

The trial is being overseen by Judge Steven Brick, who will issue a ruling after hearing expert testimony and arguments.


0 Comments


Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MORE TOP STORIES

Following a Class I recall, more than 100 BioZorb lawsuits have been filed by breast cancer survivors who suffered painful complications after the surgical tissue marker failed to dissolve as intended.
A class action lawsuit claims nitrous oxide canisters sold under names like GreatWhip and Galaxy Gas were illegally marketed for recreational use, leading to widespread addiction, nerve damage and paralysis among young users.