Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Justice Dept. Files Lawsuit Against Uber for Overcharging Passengers with DisabilitiesCompany has refused to waive wait-time fees for disabled individuals who require more time to enter vehicles. November 17, 2021 Russell Maas Add Your CommentsA discrimination lawsuit against Uber Technologies has been brought by the U.S. Justice Department, alleging that a โwait timeโ fee charged to passengers who take more than two minutes to enter the car violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).The complaint (PDF) was filed by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) in the U.S. District Court Northern District of California on November 10, alleging Uberโs policies and practices of charging wait time fees to those with disabilities is in direct violation of federal law, which strictly prohibits discrimination by private transportation companies.According to the lawsuit, Uber Technologies Inc. began charging wait time fees to passengers in a limited number of cities across the U.S. in 2016. The policy was later expanded and now currently applies to all cities nationwide.Uberโs wait time fees automatically apply a per-minute fee after two minutes of a driver marking the arrival at a set pickup location. Uberโs policy indicates the fees would continue to accumulate on a per-minute basis until either the ride has been cancelled or the vehicle trip begins.According to the Uber lawsuit filed by the Justice Department, the wait time fees are discriminatory when applied to those with disabilities, who require more than two minutes to enter a vehicle. Therefore, the actions are in violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which prohibits discrimination by private transportation companiesDo You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe Justice Department indicates passengers with disabilities may require more than two minutes to enter a vehicle for a variety of reasons, including the use of mobility aids and devices such as wheelchairs and walkers, which may need to be broken down or stored in the vehicle, or because they simply need more time to board.The lawsuit further states that Uberโs practices are discriminatory, due to a zero-exception policy that does not give the Uber driver the discretion to waive a wait time fee for those with disabilities. The DOJ references several occasions in which Uber denied wait time fee refunds to passengers even after the company was informed the fees were charged because of the passengers disability.One of the cases outlined in the lawsuit involved a 52-year-old woman who is a quadriplegic requiring the use of a wheelchair, who relied on Uber for transportation from her apartment to the rehabilitation facility and back home again at least ten times per week. She told DOJ officials Uber has and continues to charge her wait time fees on every ride due to the time it takes for her nursing aid to use a sliding board to help her transfer and slide into the backseat of the vehicle, break down and store the wheel chair and get buckled in.Despite the Florida womanโs attempt to reach out to Uber to request a refund of the wait time fees caused by her disability, Uber responded that the wait time fees were automatic and therefore nothing could be done to prevent further charges, or reimburse her for accumulated charges.โThis lawsuit seeks to bring Uber into compliance with the mandate of the Americans with Disabilities Act while sending a powerful message that Uber cannot penalize passengers with disabilities simply because they need more time to get into a car,” Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke, with the Justice Departmentโs Civil Rights Division, stated in a November 10 Justice Department press release. “Uber and other companies that provide transportation services must ensure equal access for all people, including those with disabilities.โThe lawsuit requests the court order Uber to stop discriminating against individuals with disabilities, and to modify its wait time fees to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Additionally, the DOJ is asking the court to require Uber to train their drivers on ADA policies, pay monetary damages to those subject to the illegal wait times, and pay a civil penalty to vindicate the publicโs interest in eliminating disability discrimination.Also provided in the press release, the DOJ is encouraging those with disabilities that have fallen victim to discrimination by Uberโs policies or practices to contact 833-591-0425 or email Uber.Fee@usdoj.gov to file a complaint. Written by: Russell MaasManaging Editor & Senior Legal JournalistRussell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Disabilities, Justice Department, Uber Image Credit: Image via <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/gallery-320989p1.html?cr=00&pl=edit-00">360b</a> / <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/editorial?cr=00&pl=edit-00">Shutterstock.com</a>More Lawsuit Stories Lawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect June 12, 2026 Xcela Port Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Caused Thrombosis June 12, 2026 Rezurock Lawsuit Claims GVHD Medication Caused Debilitating Skin Condition, Prurigo Nodularis June 12, 2026 0 Comments InstagramThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Lawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (Posted: today)A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims that the Abbott Proclaim XR 5 system failed to treat a manโs chronic pain, instead leaving him with shocks and burning sensations.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Malpractice Lawsuit Claims Device Left Veteran Partially Paralyzed (05/29/2026) Suboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (Posted: yesterday)A Suboxone dental erosion lawsuit filed by nine plaintiffs accuses the manufacturer of knowing the film strips caused severe tooth decay and other oral health problems, but failed to warn the medical community or patients.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (05/20/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026)Study Finds No Birth Defect Risks From Suboxone When Compared to Methadone (04/30/2026) Covidien Mesh Lawsuit Cleared for Trial Over Hernia Repair Complications (Posted: 2 days ago)A Covidien hernia mesh lawsuit will go before a jury next month after a federal judge rejected the manufacturer’s motion to have the case dismissed.MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITBard Ventralight Lawsuit Claims Hernia Mesh Failure Resulted in Ongoing Physical Disabilities (06/03/2026)Bard Ventralex Patch Lawsuit Claims Umbilical Hernia Mesh Failed, Requiring Removal Surgery (05/21/2026)Covidien ProGrip Mesh Complications Lawsuit Filed Over Alleged Defects and Failure To Warn Patients (04/21/2026)
Rezurock Lawsuit Claims GVHD Medication Caused Debilitating Skin Condition, Prurigo Nodularis June 12, 2026
Lawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (Posted: today)A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims that the Abbott Proclaim XR 5 system failed to treat a manโs chronic pain, instead leaving him with shocks and burning sensations.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Malpractice Lawsuit Claims Device Left Veteran Partially Paralyzed (05/29/2026)
Suboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (Posted: yesterday)A Suboxone dental erosion lawsuit filed by nine plaintiffs accuses the manufacturer of knowing the film strips caused severe tooth decay and other oral health problems, but failed to warn the medical community or patients.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (05/20/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026)Study Finds No Birth Defect Risks From Suboxone When Compared to Methadone (04/30/2026)
Covidien Mesh Lawsuit Cleared for Trial Over Hernia Repair Complications (Posted: 2 days ago)A Covidien hernia mesh lawsuit will go before a jury next month after a federal judge rejected the manufacturer’s motion to have the case dismissed.MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITBard Ventralight Lawsuit Claims Hernia Mesh Failure Resulted in Ongoing Physical Disabilities (06/03/2026)Bard Ventralex Patch Lawsuit Claims Umbilical Hernia Mesh Failed, Requiring Removal Surgery (05/21/2026)Covidien ProGrip Mesh Complications Lawsuit Filed Over Alleged Defects and Failure To Warn Patients (04/21/2026)