Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
AFFF Lawsuit Exposure to firefighting foam chemicals may result in an increased risk of cancer for firefighters, military and airport personnel.
Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Exposure to the toxic herbicide Paraquat has been linked to a risk of Parkinson's disease.
Justice Dept. Files Lawsuit Against Uber for Overcharging Passengers with Disabilities Company has refused to waive wait-time fees for disabled individuals who require more time to enter vehicles. November 17, 2021 Russell Maas Add Your Comments A discrimination lawsuit against Uber Technologies has been brought by the U.S. Justice Department, alleging that a “wait time” fee charged to passengers who take more than two minutes to enter the car violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The complaint (PDF) was filed by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) in the U.S. District Court Northern District of California on November 10, alleging Uber’s policies and practices of charging wait time fees to those with disabilities is in direct violation of federal law, which strictly prohibits discrimination by private transportation companies. According to the lawsuit, Uber Technologies Inc. began charging wait time fees to passengers in a limited number of cities across the U.S. in 2016. The policy was later expanded and now currently applies to all cities nationwide. Uber’s wait time fees automatically apply a per-minute fee after two minutes of a driver marking the arrival at a set pickup location. Uber’s policy indicates the fees would continue to accumulate on a per-minute basis until either the ride has been cancelled or the vehicle trip begins. According to the Uber lawsuit filed by the Justice Department, the wait time fees are discriminatory when applied to those with disabilities, who require more than two minutes to enter a vehicle. Therefore, the actions are in violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which prohibits discrimination by private transportation companies Do You Know about… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION The Justice Department indicates passengers with disabilities may require more than two minutes to enter a vehicle for a variety of reasons, including the use of mobility aids and devices such as wheelchairs and walkers, which may need to be broken down or stored in the vehicle, or because they simply need more time to board. The lawsuit further states that Uber’s practices are discriminatory, due to a zero-exception policy that does not give the Uber driver the discretion to waive a wait time fee for those with disabilities. The DOJ references several occasions in which Uber denied wait time fee refunds to passengers even after the company was informed the fees were charged because of the passengers disability. One of the cases outlined in the lawsuit involved a 52-year-old woman who is a quadriplegic requiring the use of a wheelchair, who relied on Uber for transportation from her apartment to the rehabilitation facility and back home again at least ten times per week. She told DOJ officials Uber has and continues to charge her wait time fees on every ride due to the time it takes for her nursing aid to use a sliding board to help her transfer and slide into the backseat of the vehicle, break down and store the wheel chair and get buckled in. Despite the Florida woman’s attempt to reach out to Uber to request a refund of the wait time fees caused by her disability, Uber responded that the wait time fees were automatic and therefore nothing could be done to prevent further charges, or reimburse her for accumulated charges. “This lawsuit seeks to bring Uber into compliance with the mandate of the Americans with Disabilities Act while sending a powerful message that Uber cannot penalize passengers with disabilities simply because they need more time to get into a car,” Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke, with the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, stated in a November 10 Justice Department press release. “Uber and other companies that provide transportation services must ensure equal access for all people, including those with disabilities.” The lawsuit requests the court order Uber to stop discriminating against individuals with disabilities, and to modify its wait time fees to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Additionally, the DOJ is asking the court to require Uber to train their drivers on ADA policies, pay monetary damages to those subject to the illegal wait times, and pay a civil penalty to vindicate the public’s interest in eliminating disability discrimination. Also provided in the press release, the DOJ is encouraging those with disabilities that have fallen victim to discrimination by Uber’s policies or practices to contact 833-591-0425 or email Uber.Fee@usdoj.gov to file a complaint. Tags: Disabilities, Justice Department, Uber Image Credit: Image via <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/gallery-320989p1.html?cr=00&pl=edit-00">360b</a> / <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/editorial?cr=00&pl=edit-00">Shutterstock.com</a> More Lawsuit Stories Court Clears BioZorb Lawsuit Design Defect Claims Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker March 26, 2025 Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial Selections To Be Made in Late April 2025 March 26, 2025 Lithium-Ion Battery Explosions Could Be Prevented by New Kind of Sensor March 26, 2025 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermNameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Court Clears BioZorb Lawsuit Design Defect Claims Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (Posted: today) A U.S. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITGroup of 7 BioZorb Injury Lawyers Appointed to Leadership Positions in Lawsuits Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (03/19/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File Lawsuit Over Recalled BioZorb Tissue Marker (03/12/2025)BioZorb Attorneys Propose Leadership Structure for Lawsuits Over Recalled Tissue Marker (03/05/2025) Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial Selections To Be Made in Late April 2025 (Posted: today) Parties have until April 28 to turn in a list of six Bard PowerPort lawsuits that should be prepared for bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITSmiths Medical Port Catheter Recall Issued Over Manufacturing Error (03/20/2025)E. Coli Infection Was Caused by AngioDynamics SmartPort Port Catheter, Lawsuit Alleges (03/03/2025)Schedule To Prepare Bard PowerPort Lawsuits for Bellwether Trials To Be Proposed by Parties (02/27/2025) Uterine and Endometrial Cancer Caused by Hair Relaxer Products: Lawsuit (Posted: yesterday) A hair relaxer lawsuit claims long-term use of chemical straighteners led to the development of uterine and endometrial cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITSchedule for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trials Outlined by MDL Judge (03/13/2025)Synthetic Braiding Hair Contains Cancer-Causing Chemicals: Consumer Reports (03/05/2025)Hair Relaxer Wrongful Death Lawsuit Links Fatal Endometrial Cancer to Chemical Straightener Use (03/04/2025)
Court Clears BioZorb Lawsuit Design Defect Claims Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (Posted: today) A U.S. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITGroup of 7 BioZorb Injury Lawyers Appointed to Leadership Positions in Lawsuits Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (03/19/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File Lawsuit Over Recalled BioZorb Tissue Marker (03/12/2025)BioZorb Attorneys Propose Leadership Structure for Lawsuits Over Recalled Tissue Marker (03/05/2025)
Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial Selections To Be Made in Late April 2025 (Posted: today) Parties have until April 28 to turn in a list of six Bard PowerPort lawsuits that should be prepared for bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITSmiths Medical Port Catheter Recall Issued Over Manufacturing Error (03/20/2025)E. Coli Infection Was Caused by AngioDynamics SmartPort Port Catheter, Lawsuit Alleges (03/03/2025)Schedule To Prepare Bard PowerPort Lawsuits for Bellwether Trials To Be Proposed by Parties (02/27/2025)
Uterine and Endometrial Cancer Caused by Hair Relaxer Products: Lawsuit (Posted: yesterday) A hair relaxer lawsuit claims long-term use of chemical straighteners led to the development of uterine and endometrial cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITSchedule for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trials Outlined by MDL Judge (03/13/2025)Synthetic Braiding Hair Contains Cancer-Causing Chemicals: Consumer Reports (03/05/2025)Hair Relaxer Wrongful Death Lawsuit Links Fatal Endometrial Cancer to Chemical Straightener Use (03/04/2025)