Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
AFFF Lawsuit Exposure to firefighting foam chemicals may result in an increased risk of cancer for firefighters, military and airport personnel.
Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Exposure to the toxic herbicide Paraquat has been linked to a risk of Parkinson's disease.
Gardasil HPV Vaccine Lawsuit Side effects of the Gardasil HPV vaccine have been linked to reports of serious and debilitating autoimmune injuries. Lawyers review cases nationwide.
Lexus Wrongful Death Lawsuit Results in $10M Settlement by Toyota December 27, 2010 Staff Writers Add Your Comments Toyota Motor Corp. has reportedly paid $10 million to settle a wrongful death lawsuit brought by the family of a California state trooper and three relatives who died when a Lexus vehicle they were in started accelerating out-of-control. The high profile accident gained national attention and prompted the recall of millions of Toyota and Lexus vehicles due to sudden acceleration problems. The Toyota sudden unintended acceleration lawsuit was brought by the family of Mark Saylor, a California Highway Patrol Officer, his wife Cleofe, their 13-year-old daughter Mahala and Cleofe’s brother, Christ Lastrella. All four died when Saylor lost control of a Lexus ES350 given to him as a loaner by a San Diego area Toyota dealer in August 2009. Although a settlement in the wrongful death lawsuit was reached in September, terms of the deal were not disclosed until last week. An attorney for the San Diego car dealership that loaned Saylor the Lexus revealed the details of the settlement, and Toyota has confirmed the amount. Do You Know about… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION During the accident, the Lexus accelerated to speeds as high as 120 m.p.h. before slamming into another vehicle and careening off an embankment. The accident gained national media attention as a result of a 9-1-1 call placed by Lastrella from inside the vehicle while it was accelerating out of control. In addition, witnesses reported that the car’s wheels burst into flames as Mark Saylor stood on the brakes in an attempt to stop the vehicle. The dealership, Bob Baker Lexus, has maintained that a mechanical problem inherent in some Toyota vehicles caused the accident; a theory maintained by many plaintiffs who have filed lawsuits against the company, but denied by Toyota. Instead, Toyota has pointed the finger back at the dealership, saying the staff incorrectly installed floor mats that got jammed under Saylor’s pedal. “Mr. Baker now wants the amount publicized in an apparent effort to shift the focus away from his dealership as he continues to litigate this case with the families,” claimed a press statement released by Toyota on December 23. “Mr. Baker and his dealership continue to ignore the December 2009 San Diego County Sheriff’s Department report on the Saylor accident, which determined that the cause was an incompatible all-weather floor mat from a Lexus SUV that was installed incorrectly in the ED 350 sedan at the dealership then loaned to the Saylor family by Bob Baker Lexus.” According to National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) investigations, a number of factors played into the fatal accident. First and foremost was the fact that the car, a Lexus ES350, was equipped with thick, all-weather floormats from an RX400h. The mats could not be secured properly and jammed the pedal in the throttle-open position. NHTSA investigators also found that the vehicle’s braking system, which appeared to have been heavily worn before the accident, lost power-assist when the throttle was fully opened. They also found that the gas pedal was not hinged in a way that you could pivot it and easily get it unstuck. They also determined that the fact that the Lexus’s push button starting system also factored into the accident. The button has to be held down for three full seconds before the engine will shut down, which Saylor probably did not know. Approximately one month after the accident, on September 29, Toyota announced a floor mat recall impacting 3.8 million Toyota and Lexus vehicles that contained a certain type of floor mat on the driver’s side that could cause the accelerator to stick. The revelation of the $10 million settlement will likely make it more difficult for Toyota to settle hundreds of personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits over cases of sudden acceleration. Toyota tried to get many of the cases dismissed, but the company’s efforts failed earlier this month when a federal judge cleared the cases to go forward. Just days before the amount of the settlement was released, the U.S. Department of Transportation announced that Toyota was being fined $32.4 million as the result of two federal investigations into how it handled unintended acceleration recalls and steering rod defects. Government investigators say the company stalled on the recalls and failed to notify federal safety officials about the problems in a timely manner. The fines are the maximum allowed by law. About 400 Toyota personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits have been centralized and consolidated under Judge James V. Selna for pretrial proceedings in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in Santa Ana as part of a multidistrict litigation (MDL). All of the lawsuits contain allegations that drivers or passengers experienced an injury or death after their Toyota vehicles accelerated unexpectedly out of control. The court has christened the alleged defect “Sudden Unintended Acceleration”, or SUA. Photo Courtesy of: http://www.flickr.com/photos/danielctw/ / CC BY 2.0 Tags: Accident, California, Lexus, Personal Injury, Toyota, Wrongful Death Image Credit: | More Lawsuit Stories Mediation To Discuss Settling Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Set for March 31 Through April 4 March 14, 2025 At Least 8 Lawsuits Over Oxbryta Filed Against Pfizer, Global Blood Therapeutics March 14, 2025 Judge Calls for Change Healthcare Data Breach Lawsuits in State and Federal Courts To Be Coordinated March 14, 2025 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermCommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Mediation To Discuss Settling Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Set for March 31 Through April 4 (Posted: 2 days ago) Parties involved in Covidien hernia mesh lawsuits indicate they are ready to meet with a mediator in a couple weeks to begin potential settlement negotiations. MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITCovidien Hernia Mesh Settlement Talks To Get Underway After Parties Select Mediator Next Week (02/19/2025)Discovery Deadlines in Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Extended by MDL Judge (12/12/2024)Court Appoints Bard Hernia Mesh Settlement Special Masters To Implement “Intensive” Process To Resolve Claims (11/22/2024) Schedule for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trials Outlined by MDL Judge (Posted: 3 days ago) A federal judge has outlined the schedule for preparing a group of hair relaxer lawsuits for early bellwether trials, which will not go before a jury until at least 2027. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITSynthetic Braiding Hair Contains Cancer-Causing Chemicals: Consumer Reports (03/05/2025)Hair Relaxer Wrongful Death Lawsuit Links Fatal Endometrial Cancer to Chemical Straightener Use (03/04/2025)Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Settlement Talks Begin With Focus on Finding Mediator, Parties Report (02/11/2025) Breast Cancer Survivors File Lawsuit Over Recalled BioZorb Tissue Marker (Posted: 4 days ago) A BioZorb tissue marker lawsuit representing five women from across the country claims that the recalled implant was defectively designed, resulting in a recall and numerous complications. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITBioZorb Attorneys Propose Leadership Structure for Lawsuits Over Recalled Tissue Marker (03/05/2025)Schedule Leading to First BioZorb Lawsuit Jury Trial in September 2025 Outlined By Court (02/21/2025)Judge Indicates BioZorb Recall and Warning Letter Do Not Warrant Reopening Discovery in Bellwether Cases (02/12/2025)
Mediation To Discuss Settling Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Set for March 31 Through April 4 March 14, 2025
Judge Calls for Change Healthcare Data Breach Lawsuits in State and Federal Courts To Be Coordinated March 14, 2025
Mediation To Discuss Settling Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Set for March 31 Through April 4 (Posted: 2 days ago) Parties involved in Covidien hernia mesh lawsuits indicate they are ready to meet with a mediator in a couple weeks to begin potential settlement negotiations. MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITCovidien Hernia Mesh Settlement Talks To Get Underway After Parties Select Mediator Next Week (02/19/2025)Discovery Deadlines in Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Extended by MDL Judge (12/12/2024)Court Appoints Bard Hernia Mesh Settlement Special Masters To Implement “Intensive” Process To Resolve Claims (11/22/2024)
Schedule for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trials Outlined by MDL Judge (Posted: 3 days ago) A federal judge has outlined the schedule for preparing a group of hair relaxer lawsuits for early bellwether trials, which will not go before a jury until at least 2027. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITSynthetic Braiding Hair Contains Cancer-Causing Chemicals: Consumer Reports (03/05/2025)Hair Relaxer Wrongful Death Lawsuit Links Fatal Endometrial Cancer to Chemical Straightener Use (03/04/2025)Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Settlement Talks Begin With Focus on Finding Mediator, Parties Report (02/11/2025)
Breast Cancer Survivors File Lawsuit Over Recalled BioZorb Tissue Marker (Posted: 4 days ago) A BioZorb tissue marker lawsuit representing five women from across the country claims that the recalled implant was defectively designed, resulting in a recall and numerous complications. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITBioZorb Attorneys Propose Leadership Structure for Lawsuits Over Recalled Tissue Marker (03/05/2025)Schedule Leading to First BioZorb Lawsuit Jury Trial in September 2025 Outlined By Court (02/21/2025)Judge Indicates BioZorb Recall and Warning Letter Do Not Warrant Reopening Discovery in Bellwether Cases (02/12/2025)