Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Roblox Lawsuit Families are filing Roblox lawsuits after children were targeted by predators for grooming, sextortion, sexual abuse, or exploitation on the platform. Learn who qualifies, what cases allege, and how to file a confidential claim.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Individuals who suffered severe burns, or families who lost a loved one in a tabletop fire pit explosion, may be eligible for financial compensation through a fire pit injury lawsuit.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Public Citizen Claims Life Line Screening Ads for Heart Disease, Osteoporosis, Are Deceptive January 27, 2015 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments The prominent consumer watchdog Public Citizen indicates that advertisements by the heart disease and osteoporosis screening company Life Line Screening are deceptive and misleading, calling for a federal investigation. On January 22, Public Citizen sent a letter (PDF) to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) asking that it investigate the advertising and promotional activities of Life Line Screening . According to the group, the company uses “direct-to-consumer marketing to promote inappropriately broad, nonselective cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis screening to people across the U.S.” Life Line Screening performs a variety of health screening tests, using ultrasound, finger-stick blood analysis and electrocardiographs, according to the company’s website. Do You Know about… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION “There is evidence that the company’s advertising and promotional materials contain numerous statements that may be deceptive within the meaning of the Federal Trade Commission Act,” the letter states. “These materials make unsubstantiated medical-benefit efficacy claims about Life Line Screening’s cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis screening package and omit information material to consumers regarding the risk of adverse health-related outcomes and financial harms that may result from this indiscriminate screening.” While Life Line Screening maintains that a physician reviews each screening and the results are sent to customers detailing their risk categories, Public Citizen claims that the company overstates the use of such tests and does not follow current medical guidelines. “The most egregious claims in this regard are those explicitly stating or strongly implying that the package of cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis screening tests offered by the company saves lives, improve health, and prevent strokes and other cardiovascular diseases,” the letter states. “These statements claim that Life Line Screening’s package of cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis screening tests have helped save thousands of lives since 1993 and prevent strokes and other types of cardiovascular disease. More broadly, such statements misleadingly imply that the company’s cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis screening package saves lives and prevent strokes and cardiovascular disease when used in unselected, asymptomatic individuals in the general population age of 50 or older, regardless of their cardiovascular or osteoporosis risk factor profiles, which is the very consumer population targeted by Life Line Screening.” The group urges the FTC to look at the company’s advertising practices over the last two decades and force the company to provide scientific evidence from clinical tests to substantiate its claims. If the FTC finds evidence of misleading marketing tactics, Public Citizen calls for the commission to force the company to reimburse millions of consumers who have purchased its screening tests unnecessarily. According to Life Line Screening, the company has conducted more than 8 million such tests. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Heart Disease, Life Line Screening, Osteoporosis More Lawsuit Stories Safety Problems With Roblox and Discord Endangered Young Girl: Lawsuit September 16, 2025 Three AFFF Ulcerative Colitis Lawsuits Selected for Tier 2 Bellwether Trials September 16, 2025 Sports Betting Advertising Impact on Young Adults Highlighted in CMAJ Editorial September 16, 2025 3 Comments Jackie July 13, 2017 The life screening is a joke and very misleading. After they contacted my husband and I several times telling us how it nights save our lives we decided to do the screening. We were both cleared and told we had no problems. During the test my husband was put through a very painful 15 minutes with the nurse trying to get results on his right carotid artery in his neck. After several minutes she called over another nurse to try. She said she had a hard time reading his heart beat or something to that effect. After several more minutes she said he was good and no problem. A few weeks later the results came in the mail and showed no problems. A few months later my husband became ill. Test were ordered and found out he had 90% blockage in right femoral artery, 70% blockage in right femoral artery and his right carotid artery in his neck was 100% occluded! Because of the life line test results showing no problems he could have died had I not insisted we recheck be a real doctor in a real doctors office!!! So their test don’t save lives they could very well be causing people not to seek needed medical attention so we basically they are fraud. HC Platta January 29, 2015 I completely agree with PC in their evaluation of this reportedly controversial for profit organization. Lenora January 27, 2015 I have been having Life Line screenings for many years. At first my doctor dismissed the results but lately has appreciated receiving them. It is merely a tool to guide you. You can’t really act on the results without seeing a doctor and if nothing is wrong, that should be a comfort. The costs are low for what you receive. Try going to the doctor and having the same tests for the same cost. Besides, the doctor needs a symptom to give you all those tests. I don’t know how many uninsured/underinsured people take advantage of the tests offered by Life Line, but I really think this might encourage them to have the tests without the expense of seeing a doctor. One friend was fortunate enough to have the Abdominal Aortic test which revealed an aneurysm that needed surgery. She had no idea anything was wrong. In the 8 million tests that Life Line has conducted I doubt if there have been anywhere near the number of unnecessary screenings or harm done to patients as there have been in conventional unnecessary tests/medications/surgeries. Anyone who purchased the tests for any other reason than “information only” probably has made some other purchases they might want reimbursed. Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermURLThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Safety Problems With Roblox and Discord Endangered Young Girl: Lawsuit (Posted: today) A Texas mother is pursuing a lawsuit against Roblox and Discord, claiming the design of the apps allow sexual predators to access and groom young children. MORE ABOUT: ROBLOX LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Roblox Lacks Safeguards To Protect Children From Sexual Predators (09/11/2025)Roblox Age Verification Technology To Be Implemented Amid Child Exploitation Lawsuits (09/09/2025)Roblox Kidnapping Lawsuit Filed After Child Was Abducted and Sexually Trafficked (09/03/2025) Dupixent Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Warning Label Update Being Evaluated by FDA (Posted: yesterday) Federal regulators are investigating whether Dupixent increases the risk of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), after more than 300 adverse event reports flagged cancer diagnoses among users. The FDA’s review comes as lawsuits are being pursued nationwide, alleging Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn that the blockbuster eczema drug could either trigger or mask the rare blood cancer. MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent T-Cell Lymphoma Lawsuits May Follow Recent Studies Linking Drug to Cancer Risks (09/04/2025)Dupixent Side Effects May Increase Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) Risks (08/26/2025) Lawsuit Alleges Portable Fire Pit Sold on Amazon.com Caused Flashback Burn Injuries (Posted: 4 days ago) A lack of a flame arrestor, and instructions to use rubbing alcohol, led to a teen suffering severe burns due to a flashback event involving a tabletop fire pit. MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITWayfair Fire Pit Lawsuit Links Flame Jetting Explosion to Defective Design (09/05/2025)Amazon Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Alleges ‘Flame-Jetting’ Caused Third Degree Burns (08/29/2025)Tabletop Fire Pit Burn Victims Share Stories of Explosions and Devastating Injuries (08/21/2025)
Safety Problems With Roblox and Discord Endangered Young Girl: Lawsuit (Posted: today) A Texas mother is pursuing a lawsuit against Roblox and Discord, claiming the design of the apps allow sexual predators to access and groom young children. MORE ABOUT: ROBLOX LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Roblox Lacks Safeguards To Protect Children From Sexual Predators (09/11/2025)Roblox Age Verification Technology To Be Implemented Amid Child Exploitation Lawsuits (09/09/2025)Roblox Kidnapping Lawsuit Filed After Child Was Abducted and Sexually Trafficked (09/03/2025)
Dupixent Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Warning Label Update Being Evaluated by FDA (Posted: yesterday) Federal regulators are investigating whether Dupixent increases the risk of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), after more than 300 adverse event reports flagged cancer diagnoses among users. The FDA’s review comes as lawsuits are being pursued nationwide, alleging Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn that the blockbuster eczema drug could either trigger or mask the rare blood cancer. MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent T-Cell Lymphoma Lawsuits May Follow Recent Studies Linking Drug to Cancer Risks (09/04/2025)Dupixent Side Effects May Increase Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) Risks (08/26/2025)
Lawsuit Alleges Portable Fire Pit Sold on Amazon.com Caused Flashback Burn Injuries (Posted: 4 days ago) A lack of a flame arrestor, and instructions to use rubbing alcohol, led to a teen suffering severe burns due to a flashback event involving a tabletop fire pit. MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITWayfair Fire Pit Lawsuit Links Flame Jetting Explosion to Defective Design (09/05/2025)Amazon Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Alleges ‘Flame-Jetting’ Caused Third Degree Burns (08/29/2025)Tabletop Fire Pit Burn Victims Share Stories of Explosions and Devastating Injuries (08/21/2025)