Lifelong Use of Talcum Powder Use Caused 38 Year Old Woman to Develop Ovarian Cancer: Lawsuit

After using Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder and Shower-to-Shower powder for nearly her entire life, a Pennsylvania woman indicates that she developed ovarian cancer due to side effects of the talcum powder products when she was only 38 years old. 

In a complaint (PDF) filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on June 30, Elizabeth Morrell joins a growing number of women nationwide who indicate that Johnson & Johnson has failed to adequately warn about the ovarian cancer risk associated with long-term talcum powder use for feminine hygiene purposes.

Morrell states that she used the talc-based powders to dust her perineum from about March 1969 until February 2008, when she was diagnosed with ovarian cancer. However, Morrell claims that Johnson & Johnson knew or should have known about the link between talcum powder and cancer since at least 1982, when an epidemiologic study found a 92% increased risk in ovarian tumors among women who reported genital talc use.

|
|

“Since 1982, there have been more than twenty-five (25) additional epidemiologic studies providing data regarding the association of talc and ovarian cancer,” the lawsuit states. “Nearly all of these studies have reported an elevated risk for ovarian cancer associated with genital talc use in women.”

Johnson & Johnson faces several thousand similar Baby Powder lawsuits and Shower-to-Shower lawsuits, each raising similar allegations that talc contained in the products migrated through the vagina following regular and long-term use, causing the development of ovarian cancer.

There have been at least four massive multimillion dollar verdicts against Johnson & Johnson over failure to warn about the risks associated with talcum powder, including a $110 million verdict awarded to a woman earlier this year.

Morrell’s case will be transferred to a federal MDL, or multidistrict litigation, which has been established to address the growing number of complaints that raise nearly identical questions of fact and law.

U.S. District Judge Freda Wolfson is presiding over the coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings in the District of New Jersey. However, if Johnson & Johnson fails to reach talcum powder settlements or otherwise resolve the litigation following the MDL proceedings, Morrell’s case and others may be remanded to U.S. District Courts nationwide for individual trial dates in the future.


1 Comments


Barbaara
I have used Johnson & Johnson for over fifty years and gone thru two chemo therpy treatments for ovarian cancer stage 4 & 3 but doctors won’t say the power was the cause. Now I’m waiting on biopsy reports to see what other damage I might have.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MORE TOP STORIES

A hair dye lawsuit filed by a salon stylist who worked with the chemicals for 50 years accuses cosmetics companies of failing to warn cosmetologists of the bladder cancer risks.
A Wisconsin woman has filed a Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuit, alleging that she continued using the birth control injection for years after her diagnosis due to the manufacturers’ failure to provide adequate warnings about the potential risk of developing a meningioma.
Following the rapid expansion of legalized sports betting across the U.S., a new watchdog report reveals how the gambling industry lobbied against consumer protections to prevent sports betting addictions, while wagers reached $148 billion annually.