Lung Cancer Misdiagnosis Trial Against Fugitive Doctor Underway

Trial has begun in a wrongful death lawsuit filed against an Indiana doctor who faces hundreds of medical malpractice lawsuits and attempted to hide from the law on a mountain in Italy. 

Opening arguments began yesterday in a claim for medical misdiagnosis against Dr. Mark Weinberger, who is being sued by the family of Phyllis Barnes. Weinberger repeatedly invoked his fifth amendment rights during questioning last week, saying his attorney told him to do so to avoid incriminating himself. Barnes’ family alleges that she died as a result of Weinberger’s failure to diagnose lung cancer.

Barnes went to Weinberger, known as the “Nose Doctor,” after seeing a billboard advertisement. She was suffering from a scratchy throat and sinus problems. Weinberger allegedly performed unnecessary surgeries on her and missed that the problem was caused by lung cancer.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

Weinberger fled the country in 2004, just days after Barnes’ death. According to a report by The Chicago Tribute, the doctor faces more than 350 medical malpractice suits, criminal billing fraud allegations and a breach of contract lawsuit by his insurance provider, which sued to drop coverage after he fled the country. In 2009, he was extradited from Italy after being found living in a tent on the side of a mountain.

The lung cancer misdiagnosis lawsuit brought by Barnes’ family charges Weinberger with negligence. The family is asking for about $50 million in punitive damages, but has indicated that it does not realistically expect to get the money. They hope a guilty verdict by a jury will prevent Weinberger from ever practicing medicine again.

Weinberger faces sentencing on April 27 for 22 counts of health care fraud because he billed nearly two dozen patients’ health insurance carriers for medical procedures that never happened. Weinberger plead guilty to the charges in October.


1 Comments


Razia
This is terrible to hear and reflects poorly on doctors. There is a such a strong debate about tort reform. This makes one think that tort reform is not a good thing. What if someone was capped on what they can be awarded against a doctor like this? At the same time until the government comes up with a successful tort reform model other than caps, I think that will continue to be the trend. Fortunately most doctors care about their patients and I think this is an unusual circumstance. Seems like no doubt that the doctor will lose his license and not harm any other patients.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A Tennessee man claims that a pair of rechargeable heated insoles exploded while he was wearing them, raising similar concerns to a growing number of lawsuits alleging defects may allow the batteries to overheat or fail.
A Georgia man has filed a lawsuit claiming that nitrous oxide canisters sold online through Amazon.com contributed to serious injuries and addiction.
Ahead of a case management conference this week, hair relaxer cancer lawsuit lawyers have asked a federal judge to set a date for the first bellwether trial.