Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
CPSC Toy Magnet Ban Struck Down By Appeals Court November 29, 2016 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments A federal appeals court has struck down a rule issued by federal regulators that was the designed to protect children from small, high-powered magnets that have been linked to a number of severe internal injuries, and at least one death. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued a 2-1 ruling (PDF) on November 22 which found that the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) banned small toy magnets without sufficient evidence that they carried a large enough risk to children. The toy magnet safety rules, enacted in October 2014, came after several battles with manufacturers to get them to recall products after the CPSC determined that warnings provided were insufficient to avoid injuries. One of the magnet manufacturers, Zen Magnets, LLC, protested the new rules, and challenged them in court. Do You Know about… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION The rules set a size limit for toy magnet sets to prevent them from being accidentally swallowed or ingested by small children or disabled adults, as the powerful magnets may adhere across intestinal walls and cause severe complications. If the toy magnets were smaller than a set size, they had to be limited in strength, under the rules. The CPSC rules effectively banned the powerful rare-earth magnet sets, which were often sold as office desk toys. Most companies agreed to recall their magnet sets before the rule went into place. Some previously sold magnet sets were 37 times more powerful than the new regulations would allow, the CPSC noted. According to a magnet information center website published by the CPSC, nearly 3,000 children and teenagers swallowed the magnets and had to be treated in emergency rooms nationwide between 2009 and 2013, including the death of a 19-month girl, Annaka Chaffin, after accidentally swallowing the magnets. However, two of the three judges on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals found that the CPSC did not have sufficient evidence to determine that the magnet sets caused significant harm. The majority of the three-judge panel said that the CPSC had to meet two requirements when putting in place new safety standards. First, the CPSC must identify the degree and nature of the risk of injury, how many products would be affected by the rule, if the public needs the products, and what means of reducing the risk of injury could be put in place. Second, the CPSC must only put in place a standard that is necessary to eliminate or reduce an unreasonable risk of injury, is in the public interest, which has benefits that have a reasonable relationship to the cost, and that poses the least burden. “In this instance, the Commission’s rulemaking analysis fails at the first step of the Act’s two-step process: the initial cost and benefit findings,” the majority ruled. “Specifically, the Commission’s analysis neglected to address critical ambiguities and complexities in the data underpinning the Commission’s findings as to (1) the degree of the risk of injury caused by magnet sets, and (2) the public’s need for the sets and the rule’s effect on their utility and availability.” The ruling is seen as a victory for Zen Magnets, the only manufacturer still fighting to stay on the market. However, a day after the ruling, Zen Magnets and the U.S. Department of Justice entered into a consent agreement (PDF) on a $5.5 million civil penalty aimed at the company for illegally selling more than 400,000 recalled magnets. However, the details of the civil penalty requires Zen Magnets to only ultimately pay $10,000. Tags: Children, Infant Death, Magnets More Lawsuit Stories Oxbryta Settlement Discussions in Class Action Lawsuits Set for Sept. 2025 July 8, 2025 Mead Johnson Must Face Enfamil NEC Lawsuit in Missouri State Court July 8, 2025 FanDuel Class Action Lawsuit Alleges Fantasy Games Constitute Illegal Sports Gambling July 8, 2025 1 Comments Amy August 29, 2021 My 8 year old grandson is fighting for his life after accidentally ingesting 19 of those evil balls! How many body and colostomy bags does the court have to see before they believe the threat to teens and children is real!!!! How much lobbyist blood money prevented our government legislators from acting on this? Who are the judges who voted to allow this horror to continue? Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermEmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Oxbryta Settlement Discussions in Class Action Lawsuits Set for Sept. 2025 (Posted: today) A mediator has been appointed to oversee settlement discussions between parties involved in an Oxbryta class action lawsuit, which claims the recalled drug endangered sickle cell disease patients. MORE ABOUT: OXBRYTA LAWSUITWrongful Death Lawsuit Links Oxbryta Side Effects to Deadly Vaso-Occlusive Crises (06/05/2025)Oxbryta Recall Lawsuit Alleges Sickle Cell Drug Increased Frequency of Dangerous VOCs (05/23/2025)First Oxbryta Lawsuit Set for Trial in August 2027, Over Recalled Sickle Cell Drug Risks (05/09/2025) Lawsuit Indicates Biozorb Side Effects Left Woman With Chronic Pain, Disfiguring Injuries (Posted: yesterday) A BioZorb side effects lawsuit indicates that a woman is suffering chronic pain and soreness after the tissue marker implant failed to absorb into her body as advertised. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITBioZorb Implant Removal Surgery: What Women Need To Know When the Device Fails To Dissolve (06/30/2025)Lawsuit Claims Biozorb Implant Penetrated Skin, Causing Massive Infection (06/04/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File BioZorb Tissue Marker Lawsuit After Implant Fails (05/20/2025) Second Wave of Valsartan Cancer Lawsuits To Be Ready for Bellwether Trials by January 2026 (Posted: yesterday) A new schedule for a second wave of Valsartan cancer lawsuit bellwether trials hopes to have a case ready to go before a jury by January 2026. MORE ABOUT: VALSARTAN LAWSUITCourt Outlines Valsartan Lawsuits Trial Schedule for “Wave 2” Bellwether Cases (05/28/2025)Order Requires Valsartan Recall Lawsuits To Provide Product Identification for Specific Generic Drug Makers Named (03/27/2025)Deadlines Leading to First Valsartan Bellwether Trial on Sept. 8, 2025 Outlined by Special Master (03/04/2025)
Oxbryta Settlement Discussions in Class Action Lawsuits Set for Sept. 2025 (Posted: today) A mediator has been appointed to oversee settlement discussions between parties involved in an Oxbryta class action lawsuit, which claims the recalled drug endangered sickle cell disease patients. MORE ABOUT: OXBRYTA LAWSUITWrongful Death Lawsuit Links Oxbryta Side Effects to Deadly Vaso-Occlusive Crises (06/05/2025)Oxbryta Recall Lawsuit Alleges Sickle Cell Drug Increased Frequency of Dangerous VOCs (05/23/2025)First Oxbryta Lawsuit Set for Trial in August 2027, Over Recalled Sickle Cell Drug Risks (05/09/2025)
Lawsuit Indicates Biozorb Side Effects Left Woman With Chronic Pain, Disfiguring Injuries (Posted: yesterday) A BioZorb side effects lawsuit indicates that a woman is suffering chronic pain and soreness after the tissue marker implant failed to absorb into her body as advertised. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITBioZorb Implant Removal Surgery: What Women Need To Know When the Device Fails To Dissolve (06/30/2025)Lawsuit Claims Biozorb Implant Penetrated Skin, Causing Massive Infection (06/04/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File BioZorb Tissue Marker Lawsuit After Implant Fails (05/20/2025)
Second Wave of Valsartan Cancer Lawsuits To Be Ready for Bellwether Trials by January 2026 (Posted: yesterday) A new schedule for a second wave of Valsartan cancer lawsuit bellwether trials hopes to have a case ready to go before a jury by January 2026. MORE ABOUT: VALSARTAN LAWSUITCourt Outlines Valsartan Lawsuits Trial Schedule for “Wave 2” Bellwether Cases (05/28/2025)Order Requires Valsartan Recall Lawsuits To Provide Product Identification for Specific Generic Drug Makers Named (03/27/2025)Deadlines Leading to First Valsartan Bellwether Trial on Sept. 8, 2025 Outlined by Special Master (03/04/2025)