PFAS Ban Passed By Maryland Senate With Support From State Firefighters Concerned About AFFF Exposures

Inspired by a veteran firefighterโ€™s death following exposure to toxic chemicals in firefighting foam, the Maryland Senate voted this week to ban the use of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), as well as other consumer products and packaging materials.

The bill to ban PFAS still needs to pass the Maryland House of Delegates and be signed into law by the governor. It is named the George Walter Taylor Act, after a Maryland firefighter who died of cancer believed to be linked to exposures to AFFF; which contains PFAS chemicals and is widely used to combat petroleum fires.

PFAS were first introduced into the manufacturing industry in the 1940โ€™s, because of their ability to resist heat, grease, stains, and water. However, since the chemicals are known to persist and build up in the environment, leading to the nickname โ€œforever chemicals”, a myriad of adverse health effects have been linked to exposure, including liver damage, thyroid disease, decreased fertility, high cholesterol, obesity, hormone suppression, and cancer.

While the chemicals are found in a wide variety of products, including some food packaging materials, pizza boxes, popcorn bags, fabrics, nonstick cooking pans, and other products, most of the concerns have focused on high volumes of the PFAS chemicals that entered drinking water supplies from aqueous film-forming foams widely used near airports, military bases and firefighting training centers in recent decades.

Although safer alternatives were available to fight fuel based fires without PFAS chemicals, versions of the firefighting foam were sold for decades by 3M Company and other companies, who now face a growing number of AFFF exposure lawsuits brought by firefighters diagnosed with cancer and others regularly exposed to contaminated drinking water.

AFFF Cancer Lawsuit
AFFF Cancer Lawsuit

The bill calling for a PFAS ban passed the Maryland Senate unanimously with bipartisan support and no debate. It was supported by the Maryland Professional Firefighters Association, who say cancer has replaced heart problems as the leading cause of death in firefighters for the last 20 years, pointing to PFAS exposure as the cause of that high cancer rate.

The bill would prohibit the use, manufacture, sale or distribution of Class B firefighting foam, which includes PFAS chemicals, in the state of Maryland. It would place the same prohibitions on rugs and carpets and food packaging designed for direct food contact. The ban would go into effect on January 1, 2024.

Maryland joins a growing number of states who are taking action against PFAS, claiming the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is moving too slowly to put adequate regulations in place.

In July,ย Maine put in place a ban on PFASย which will go into effect by 2030. In addition to Maine, New York set guidelines last January which set limits on allowable concentrations on some PFAS chemicals. Additionally, also in July, two U.S. Senators introduced a bill which would ban the use of PFAS in cosmetics.

Irvin Jackson
Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A Depo-Provera intracranial meningioma lawsuit claims Pfizer developed and sold a defective birth control injection that puts women at a five times increased risk of brain tumors.
A lawsuit alleges an Illinois woman developed CTCL after using Dupixent, raising concerns the manufacturer may have withheld concerns that the drug could contribute to cancer.
FanDuel and DraftKings face a sportsbook class action lawsuit alleging they intentionally promote their sites in a way that causes severe economic and emotional harm.