PFAS Ban Passed By Maryland Senate With Support From State Firefighters Concerned About AFFF Exposures

If passed into law, Maryland would ban PFAS chemicals in firefighting foam, carpets and food packaging sold, manufactured, distributed or used in the state

Inspired by a veteran firefighter’s death following exposure to toxic chemicals in firefighting foam, the Maryland Senate voted this week to ban the use of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), as well as other consumer products and packaging materials.

The bill to ban PFAS still needs to pass the Maryland House of Delegates and be signed into law by the governor. It is named the George Walter Taylor Act, after a Maryland firefighter who died of cancer believed to be linked to exposures to AFFF; which contains PFAS chemicals and is widely used to combat petroleum fires.

PFAS were first introduced into the manufacturing industry in the 1940’s, because of their ability to resist heat, grease, stains, and water. However, since the chemicals are known to persist and build up in the environment, leading to the nickname “forever chemicals”, a myriad of adverse health effects have been linked to exposure, including liver damage, thyroid disease, decreased fertility, high cholesterol, obesity, hormone suppression, and cancer.

While the chemicals are found in a wide variety of products, including some food packaging materials, pizza boxes, popcorn bags, fabrics, nonstick cooking pans, and other products, most of the concerns have focused on high volumes of the PFAS chemicals that entered drinking water supplies from aqueous film-forming foams widely used near airports, military bases and firefighting training centers in recent decades.

Although safer alternatives were available to fight fuel based fires without PFAS chemicals, versions of the firefighting foam were sold for decades by 3M Company and other companies, who now face a growing number of AFFF exposure lawsuits brought by firefighters diagnosed with cancer and others regularly exposed to contaminated drinking water.

Firefighting Foam Lawsuits

Were you or a loved one exposed to toxic AFFF Chemicals?

Lawyers are reviewing aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) lawsuits for firefighters, military personnel and individuals who developed cancer or other health issues from exposure to toxic firefighting foam chemicals.

Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION

The bill calling for a PFAS ban passed the Maryland Senate unanimously with bipartisan support and no debate. It was supported by the Maryland Professional Firefighters Association, who say cancer has replaced heart problems as the leading cause of death in firefighters for the last 20 years, pointing to PFAS exposure as the cause of that high cancer rate.

The bill would prohibit the use, manufacture, sale or distribution of Class B firefighting foam, which includes PFAS chemicals, in the state of Maryland. It would place the same prohibitions on rugs and carpets and food packaging designed for direct food contact. The ban would go into effect on January 1, 2024.

Maryland joins a growing number of states who are taking action against PFAS, claiming the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is moving too slowly to put adequate regulations in place.

In July, Maine put in place a ban on PFAS which will go into effect by 2030. In addition to Maine, New York set guidelines last January which set limits on allowable concentrations on some PFAS chemicals. Additionally, also in July, two U.S. Senators introduced a bill which would ban the use of PFAS in cosmetics.


Find Out If You Qualify for A AFFF Lawsuit Settlement

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Change Healthcare Data Breach Lawyers Meeting Today With MDL Judge For Initial Status Conference
Change Healthcare Data Breach Lawyers Meeting Today With MDL Judge For Initial Status Conference (Posted today)

The judge presiding over all Change Healthcare lawsuits filed in federal court is holding the first status conference of the litigation, which is expected to grow significantly as Change Healthcare data breach letters continue to be sent to impacted customers.

Angiodynamics LifePort Lawsuit Filed Over Risk of the Port Catheters Failing, Causing Severe Injury
Angiodynamics LifePort Lawsuit Filed Over Risk of the Port Catheters Failing, Causing Severe Injury (Posted yesterday)

Complaint comes as a panel of federal judges are scheduled to hear oral arguments later this month, to determine whether all AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits filed in U.S. District Courts nationwide should be centralized before one judge.