Maytag Recall: 1.7 Million Dishwashers May Pose Fire Hazard

Staff Writers

Add Your Comments

About 1.7 million Maytag dishwashers, sold under a variety of labels, have been recalled after reports that they can overheat and burst into flames. 

The Maytag dishwasher recall was announced on June 3, by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) after Maytag received 12 reports that the heating elements in the dishwashers failed, causing fires and dishwasher damage. In one report a kitchen suffered extensive fire damage.

The defect appears to be an electrical failure in the dishwasher’s heating element. Although there have been no injuries reported in connection to the defective Maytag dishwashers, the CPSC warns that the defect can pose a serious fire hazard.

Do You Know about…

Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuits

Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.

Learn More
SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

Do You Know About…

Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuits

Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.

Learn More
SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION

The recalled dishwashers were sold under a number of labels, including Maytag, Amana, Jenn-Air, Admiral, Magic Chef, Performa and Crosley. The brand name is printed on the front of the dishwashers, which were manufactured with black, bisque, white and stainless steel front panels.

The model and serial numbers are located on a label on the inside of the plastic tub, near the left side of the door opening. The recall affects all Maytag dishwashers starting with the serial numbers NW39, NW40, NW41, NW42, NW43, NW44, NW45, NW46, NW47, NW48, NW49, NW50, NW51, NW52, NY01, NY02, NY03, NY04, NY05, NY06, NY07, NY08, NY09, NY10, NY11, NY12, NY13, NY14, NY15, NY16, NY17, NY18, and NY19; or ending with the serial numbers JC, JE, JG, JJ, JL, JN, JP, JR, JT, JV, JX, LA, LC, LE, LG, LJ, LL, LN, LP, LR, LT, LV, LX, NA, NC, NE, NG, NJ, NL, NN, NP, or NR.

The dishwashers were sold nationwide at department stores, appliance stores and by homebuilders for between $250 and $900 from February 2006 through April 2010.

The CPSC recommends that consumers immediately stop using the dishwashers, and disconnect them by shutting off the fuse or the circuit breaker, as opposed to simply unplugging the dishwashers. They should then contact Maytag at (800)544-5513 to ensure that the dishwasher is affected by the recall. Maytag is offering free in-home repair or rebates toward the purchase of new Maytag dishwashers.

Tags: Appliance Recall, Defective Product, Maytag Recall

More Lawsuit Stories

3 Comments

elizabeth
Got a letter about the recall and mine was included. Rep said they could send repairman or give rebate on THEIR mid-high end dishwashers…other brands not an option. I chose repairman…waited all day and they never showed up. Called Maytag and got repairman’s name and number. Repairman said they only come to my area on Thursdays….the only day pf the week I am not available. Called Maytag and was told this was the ONLY repairman available for a very large area of over 300k households! Refused any other solution. Will have to miss a days wages to fix THEIR defective product???? Buyer Beware of Maytag! Next letter….better business bureau….
Susan
Called Maytag today about my dishwasher, stop using right away, we don’t want it fixed, it’s been worthless since we bought, you get a credit only if you get a Maytag or whatever else they reccomend. No more Maytag for me! Class action suit please!
J.J.
My wife and I bought a foreclosure and had to buy all new appliances. So we bought Maytag-Dishwasher, Microwave, Stove, Refrigerator, Washing Machine and Dryer. Within the first year the control panel on the door of the dishwasher went bad. They fixed it within another year the door went bad again, my wife went on line and saw the recall and they said it did not fall under the recall. So we started to get prices to fix then about a month later we went on line again and it did fall under it. When the guy came out, after they rescheduled, he said the door did not fal under the recall or warranty only the heating brackets. Then they said well parts fall uder the warranty but not labor and the labor was more than the part, which was easy to install. So I said well just send me the part I’ll install it. They said well if you install it, it’s not covered. I will never buy another Maytag appliance or appliances built by the company making Maytag or owns them again. I can not believe they wanted me to pay half the price of a new dishwasher to have a part installed that had gone bad within one year the last two times installed.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

First Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Trial Over Symbotex ProblemsTo Begin Next Week
The first Covidien hernia mesh bellwether trial begins on Monday in Massachusetts federal court involving claims that the Symbotex mesh is defectively designed.
Indivior faces nearly 18,000 Suboxone dental erosion lawsuits filed by individuals nationwide who say the opioid addiction treatment caused severe tooth damage.
Nevro SCS Lawsuits Warrant Centralization in New MDL Motion
Plaintiffs have requested that the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidate all Nevro spinal cord stimulator lawsuits in the Central District of California for pretrial procedures.