MDL Sought for Chantix Lawsuits Over Cancer-Causing Contaminants

With a growing number of Chantix class action lawsuits being pursued against Pfizer, over cancer-causing chemicals that have contaminated the stop-smoking drug, a motion has been filed which seeks to consolidate the claims before one U.S. District Judge as part of an MDL, or multidistrict litigation.

Chantix (varenicline) was introduced by Pfizer in 2006, as a prescription medication designed to help people quit smoking. However,ย problems with Chantix began to surface last year, when it was discovered that pills may contain dangerous levels of nitrosamines, which are believed to be a byproduct of the drug manufacturing process and may expose users to a risk of cancer.

Between June and September 2021, Pfizer announced a series ofย Chantix recalls, starting with limited batches of the medication sold, and later expanding the recall to include all lots of Chantix 0.5 mg and 1 mg tablets, all due to the same problems with high levels of the cancer-causing chemicals being detected in pills.

As a result of the recalls, multiple Chantix lawsuits have been filed against Pfizer seeking class action status to pursue damages for consumers who paid for the expensive smoking cessation drug, which was adulterated and unfit for its intended purpose.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

On August 31, the County of Monmouth, New Jersey filed a motion (PDF) with the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML), calling for all Chantix lawsuits and any other tag-along actions asserting similar claims against Pfizer Inc. to be centralized in the District of New Jersey, as part of a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL).

The motion indicates there are at least eight nearly identical class action lawsuits awaiting pretrial discovery in separate federal courts, each raising similar questions of fact and law revolving around Pfizerโ€™s Chantix medications that were adulterated or defective due to the presence of nitrosamine contamination.

The County further petitions the JPML to transfer the cases to the District of New Jersey, claiming this venue is proper and is where Pfizer has admitted multiple witnesses are located. The motion states little would be gained by consolidating the cases in New York, where Pfizerโ€™s headquarters are located, since the medication was largely tested and manufactured oversees in Ireland and Germany.

The request to consolidate the Chantix lawsuits comes after the JPML has formed several other coordinated proceedings for Zantac lawsuits and valsartan lawsuits filed over the same chemical impurities that contaminated the popular heartburn and blood pressure drugs.

Written by: Russell Maas

Managing Editor & Senior Legal Journalist

Russell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโ€™s leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโ€™s editorial strategy, including SEO and content development.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Plaintiffs and defendants involved in hair relaxer cancer lawsuits are expected to turn in a list of 12 cases that the parties believe are fit to serve as bellwether trials.
Cartiva implant lawsuits are moving forward in federal court as patients across the United States seek compensation for complications linked to the recalled big toe device.
An Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuit filed by three women says the product was defectively designed, inappropriately approved by the FDA, and left them with severe injuries, worsening pain and the need for removal surgery.