Medtronic MiniMed Insulin Pump Lawsuit Alleges Device Failure Caused Hyperglycemic Episode

An Oklahoma man has filed a product liability lawsuit over a Medtronic Minimed infusion pump failure, which allegedly caused him to suffer hyperglycemia after the device failed to deliver enough insulin.

The complaint (PDF) was filed last month by Clayton Warmoth in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, indicating he experienced problems only a few months before a Class I Medtronic MiniMed pump recall was issued by the manufacturer in February 2020.

Medtronic Minimed insulin pumps are small, computerized devices intended to deliver specific amounts of insulin to diabetic patients throughout the day, via a catheter implanted under the skin. They are wirelessly connected to both the patientโ€™s blood glucose meter and a monitoring system to track glucose levels, as well as a remote controller designed to communicate with the pump and deliver a specific amount of insulin.

"*" indicates required fields

"*" indicates required fields

When functioning properly, these devices and their components mimic the ways a healthy pancreas works by delivering continuous and controlled doses of rapid-acting insulin, 24 hours a day, to match the userโ€™s body needs. However, following more than 26,000 reports involving Medtronic Minimed pump failures, the manufacturer acknowledged that certain products may be prone to over or under deliver the programmed amount of insulin.

Warmothโ€™s lawsuit indicates he began using his Minimed device in 2018 to treat his Type 1 diabetes. However, he awoke on July 15, 2019, suffering from difficulty walking and speaking. He was taken to a hospital by ambulance, where it was determined he was suffering from hyperglycemia, with a blood glucose level of 650 milligrams per decaliter (mg/dL).

When the Minimed infusion pumps were recalled, Medtronic indicated there was a defect in the locking retainer rings which prevent the insulin reservoir from being properly set inside the pump when it is loaded, potentially preventing the delivery of life-saving insulin.

โ€œDefendantsโ€™ products were defective in light of the dangers posed by their respective design and the likelihood of those avoidable dangers,โ€ the lawsuit states. โ€œThere were safer alternative designs that would have prevented or significantly reduced the risk of injury.โ€

The case raises allegations similar to those presented in a growing number ofย similar Medtronic Minimed lawsuits filed since the recall, each claiming the manufacturer knew, or should have known, defects with the 600 series insulin pumps posed a serious risk for consumers.

Over the coming months and years, as product liability lawyers continue to investigate claims for individuals who experienced problems after a Medtronic Minimed pump failure, the size and scope of the litigation is expected to continue to increase, likely involving hundreds of lawsuits that may be filed in courts nationwide.

Irvin Jackson
Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims that the Abbott Proclaim XR 5 system failed to treat a manโ€™s chronic pain, instead leaving him with shocks and burning sensations.
A Suboxone dental erosion lawsuit filed by nine plaintiffs accuses the manufacturer of knowing the film strips caused severe tooth decay and other oral health problems, but failed to warn the medical community or patients.