Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
Medtronic MiniMed Wrongful Death Lawsuit Filed Over Insulin Overdose from Recalled Infusion Sets March 27, 2018 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments A wrongful death lawsuit has been filed over problems with a Medtronic MiniMed insulin pump, after the device allegedly malfunctioned, pumping an entire week’s worth of insulin into a Mississippi woman in one night. The complaint (PDF) was filed last month in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi, by Michael Davis, on behalf of himself and his late wife, Debbie Myers Davis. Prior to her death, Debbie Davis used a Medtronic MiniMed pump to receive appropriate amounts of insulin to control her diabetes, according to the product liability lawsuit. Stay Up-to-Date About Medtronic MiniMed Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Medtronic MiniMed lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More Stay Up-to-Date About Medtronic MiniMed Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Medtronic MiniMed lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More In January 2017, Davis used a Medtronic MiniMed Quick-Set Infusion set to change and load her insulin pump before going to bed. The next morning, she was found unresponsive, after suffering a stroke due to severe hypoglycemia. According to allegations raised in the complaint, defects with the infusion sets and Medtronic MiniMed pump caused the injuries, because an entire week’s worth of insulin was pumped into Davis’ body while she slept. She never recovered from the stroke, and died on March 14, 2017. Only a few months after Davis’s death, a Medtronic MiniMed infusion pump recall was announced, following reports of consumers suffering hypoglycemia after the pumps delivered too much insulin. Davis’s pump was one of those affected by the recall. Medtronic indicated that a discontinued component, called a vent membrane, was responsible for the problem, and changed the design in April 2017, months before it alerted the medical community and consumers to the problem. “Defendants were aware or should have been aware of the defects and risks associated with their products, but proceeded with conscious indifference to the rights, safety and welfare of others,” the lawsuit states. “Over-delivery of insulin is a serious matter that poses catastrophhic, lethal risks.” Medtronic MiniMed Problems Medtronic has had a number of problems with its Minimed infusion products over the years. In September 2014, Medtronic issued a MiniMed Paradigm insulin pump recall for more than half a million units following reports that programming errors led to patients receiving the wrong dose of insulin. At least one report of hypoglycemia was linked to the problem, which caused some users to accidentally give themselves the maximum insulin dose. In June 2013, the company issued a MiniMed Paradigm infusion set recall because fluid could get into vents, preventing the pump from priming properly, which could cause severe or even fatal health problems for diabetics. It was one of four recalls or urgent device notifications involving Medtronic’s insulin pumps that year alone. In 2009, Medtronic Inc. issued a similar recall for approximately three million Quick-set infusion setsused with its MiniMed Paradigm insulin pumps, due to a manufacturing defect that could result in the delivery of incorrect doses of insulin and cause injury or death for diabetics using the Medtronic insulin pumps. Following that recall, a number of Medtronic infusion set lawsuits were filed on behalf of patients of suffered serious injury or death when they received too much or too little insulin. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior legal and investigative journalist with more than 30 years of experience covering complex issues at the intersection of law, politics, and environmental policy. He began his reporting career in 1991 after graduating from Wayne. Tags: Diabetes, Diabetes Drug, Hypoglycemia, Infusion Pump, Insulin, Medical Device Recall, Medtronic, Wrongful Death Lawsuit Image Credit: Image via <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/gallery-931246p1.html?cr=00&pl=edit-00">Ken Wolter</a> / <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/editorial?cr=00&pl=edit-00">Shutterstock.com</a> More Medtronic MiniMed Lawsuit Stories Medtronic MiniMed Insulin Pump Recall Over Battery Failure Risks October 7, 2024 FDA Issues “Do Not Use” Warning for Recalled Medtronic NIM Endotracheal Tubes July 10, 2024 Medfusion Syringe Pump Recall Issued Over Software Errors March 6, 2024 1 Comments Barry December 3, 2019 My sister was killed by Medtronic infusion sets blockage. Initially Medtronics said it was blocked, and could result in over or under delivery. So high or low blood sugar can result. Insulin shock, strokes, brain damage, and loss of sensorium prior to the loss of consciousness are obvious problems of getting too much insulin. Rapidly increasing ketoacidocis, violent sickness, loss of sensorium, confusion, and coma, heart and brain malfunction and death is the obvious problem of a patient not getting their insulin. The obvious question is why does Medtronics wait months to tell FDA they’ve had problems, then fix the problem and begin selling the repaired improved version months thereafter, WITH NO ANNOUNCEMENT OR DISCLOSURE TO MARKET, MEDICAL COMMUNITY OR CUSTOMERS. Then, 5 months later , 4 weeks after my sister died of blocked infusion set, the notice arrives on the front porch, “urgent recall” on a small package of replacement infusion sets. How many “in hand” infusion sets were out in the hands of users and clinics, and retailers and distributors being used up, at risk of a fatal outcome, while they had the solution for sale, no notice to anyone. Each one used worldwide for that 5 or 8 month period was one they didn’t have to replace and dispose of. 10s of millions? How many injuries, hospitalizations, strokes or deaths occurred after they got their indication of a problem back in ’16? How much market share would they lose if they told users to start using syringes again until they get it fixed, or switch over to B &D or J &J infusion sets. That’s a lot of motivation to keep it a secret. An anxious and increasingly confused and sickened user would have knowledge to try a new infusion set, instead of the obvious, wondering why the pump wasn’t delivering. It’s well known that diminished brain function comes with deficient diabetic controls. They should know to give simple instructions as warnings, for most of a year the world was kept in the dark. Indeed, even on the responses to FDA problem reports, deaths, mostly, the company’s responses were virtually 100% ” send in your pump.. followed by ” the pump is testing fine” with no mention of the retention and sending in the KNOWN defective infusion sets, or reporting the set’s serial and manufacturing codes. That’s deceit, not negligence. Comprehensive investigations and honest assessments are not kept under wraps, and a continuum of minimal responses for months and months is highly questionable, and probably should be punished. Shame on them; shareholders okay with this? Surely not on a moral scale, profits excluded. Shame. Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermCommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Strattice Mesh Lawsuit Scheduled for First Federal Bellwether Trial (Posted: today) A U.S. federal magistrate judge will meet with parties this Wednesday to discuss preparation for the first Strattice hernia mesh bellwether trial that is scheduled to begin in February. MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITCovidien Parietex Optimized Composite (PCOx) Hernia Mesh Lawsuits To Be Prepared for Trial (05/21/2025)Second Bellwether Trial in Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit MDL Set for July 2026 (05/14/2025)Covidien Mesh Lawsuit Set For Trial in Feb. 2026, Over Defective Hernia Implant (04/10/2025) Problems With BioZorb Tissue Markers Not Adequately Disclosed by Manufacturer: Lawsuit (Posted: yesterday) Hologic, Inc. faces a BioZorb tissue marker lawsuit filed by two Montana women who say the implants failed to absorb properly into their bodies. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITLawyers Preparing BioZorb Lawsuit To Go Before Jury on Sept. 8, 2025 (07/23/2025)Lawsuit Indicates Biozorb Side Effects Left Woman With Chronic Pain, Disfiguring Injuries (07/07/2025)BioZorb Implant Removal Surgery: What Women Need To Know When the Device Fails To Dissolve (06/30/2025) Judge Orders Cartiva Implant Settlement Talks Before Trial in Aug. 2026 (Posted: yesterday) The first Cartiva toe implant trial has been delayed until August 2026, with parties ordered to engage in settlement negotiations. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Settlement Rumors Mount Again, as More Toe Implant Lawsuits Withdrawn and Trials Approach (06/26/2025)Failed Cartiva Implant Resulted in Need for Removal, Big Toe Fusion Surgery: Lawsuit (04/10/2025)Cartiva SCI Lawsuit Alleges Toe Implant Worsened Pain, Decreased Range of Motion (03/31/2025)
Strattice Mesh Lawsuit Scheduled for First Federal Bellwether Trial (Posted: today) A U.S. federal magistrate judge will meet with parties this Wednesday to discuss preparation for the first Strattice hernia mesh bellwether trial that is scheduled to begin in February. MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITCovidien Parietex Optimized Composite (PCOx) Hernia Mesh Lawsuits To Be Prepared for Trial (05/21/2025)Second Bellwether Trial in Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit MDL Set for July 2026 (05/14/2025)Covidien Mesh Lawsuit Set For Trial in Feb. 2026, Over Defective Hernia Implant (04/10/2025)
Problems With BioZorb Tissue Markers Not Adequately Disclosed by Manufacturer: Lawsuit (Posted: yesterday) Hologic, Inc. faces a BioZorb tissue marker lawsuit filed by two Montana women who say the implants failed to absorb properly into their bodies. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITLawyers Preparing BioZorb Lawsuit To Go Before Jury on Sept. 8, 2025 (07/23/2025)Lawsuit Indicates Biozorb Side Effects Left Woman With Chronic Pain, Disfiguring Injuries (07/07/2025)BioZorb Implant Removal Surgery: What Women Need To Know When the Device Fails To Dissolve (06/30/2025)
Judge Orders Cartiva Implant Settlement Talks Before Trial in Aug. 2026 (Posted: yesterday) The first Cartiva toe implant trial has been delayed until August 2026, with parties ordered to engage in settlement negotiations. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Settlement Rumors Mount Again, as More Toe Implant Lawsuits Withdrawn and Trials Approach (06/26/2025)Failed Cartiva Implant Resulted in Need for Removal, Big Toe Fusion Surgery: Lawsuit (04/10/2025)Cartiva SCI Lawsuit Alleges Toe Implant Worsened Pain, Decreased Range of Motion (03/31/2025)