Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Medtronic Video Laryngoscopes Recall Results in “Do Not Use” WarningFDA indicates that the batteries in Medtronic video laryngoscopes may overheat or explode, posing a risk of serious injury or death for patients. September 9, 2024 Martha Garcia Add Your CommentsFederal health officials are warning that recalled Medtronic video laryngoscopes can cause serious injuries if the batteries overheat or explode, potentially resulting in burns, respiratory failure or other life-threatening injuries.The Medtronic laryngoscope recall was announced by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on September 5, urging medical providers not to use McGrath MAC Video Laryngoscopes, McGrath MAC EMS Video Laryngoscopes and Next-Generation McGrath MAC Video Laryngoscopes.Laryngoscopes are devices used to help doctors see into the trachea during a medical procedure. They contain a tube with a camera inside that is placed down the trachea to view the larynx or voice box during laryngoscopy.The agency has given the recall a class I designation, indicating that the laryngoscope battery problems pose a serious threat of injury or death to patients.Medtronic Laryngoscope Battery ExplosionsThe FDA announced the laryngoscope recall after receiving numerous reports involving battery problems, and at least one instance that resulted in a patient injury. However, no reports of death have been linked to the Medtronic laryngoscope battery issues so far.The recall pulls some Medtronic laryngoscopes from the market, and updates the use instructions for the batteries of other laryngoscopes.Reports indicate the battery in the devices may drain below the designated threshold, which can cause the battery to become unstable and overheat, potentially leading to an explosion.A laryngoscope battery explosion could cause serious injuries, such as burns, cuts, scarring, tissue injuries, tooth loss, eye injury, damaged hearing, ringing in the ears, respiratory failure, lack of oxygen to the body and death.Stay Up-to-Date AboutMedtronic MiniMed LawsuitsAboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Medtronic MiniMed lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fieldsEmail* SIGN ME UPΔ Learn MoreStay Up-to-Date AboutMedtronic MiniMed LawsuitsAboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Medtronic MiniMed lawsuit updates or developments."*" indicates required fieldsEmail* SIGN ME UPΔ Learn MoreThe recall completely pulls the McGrath MAC Video and MAC EMS Video Laryngoscopes from the market. The FDA warns that medical professionals should stop using the devices immediately, remove the battery from the device assembly, and throw it away. The devices should then be returned to Medtronic, according to the recall guidelines.However, the McGrath Next-Generation MAC Laryngoscope is not being recalled from the market. Instead, the device’s use instructions are being updated, to provide additional information about battery handling in an addendum to the “Instructions for Use”.The FDA indicates that health care professionals should not use any batteries past the “use by” date found on the McGrath 3.6V battery assembly and should follow proper handling and storage instructions.Customers can replace the battery assembly with a new McGrath 3.6V battery, if the battery has not been stored in the improper conditions outlined in the updated instructions, or if the battery has not been dropped.The updated use instructions were issued to all customers via an Urgent Medical Device Removal and Correction letter issued by Medtronic in July 2024.The Next-Generation Laryngoscopes can continue to be used if the updated instructions and proper battery handling are followed.The recall affects McGrath MAC Video Laryngoscopes and McGrath MAC EMS Video Laryngoscopes with unique device identifier/model numbers 15060272980020/300-000-000 and 15060272980129/300-200-000 and serial numbers 366179 to 405673.The “for use” instruction updates affect Next-Generation McGrath MAC Video Laryngoscopes with unique device identifier/model numbers 10884521823396/301-000-000 and 10884521776494/301-000-000. Use by dates and serial numbers can be found on the labels for the 3.6V battery.Customers can contact Medtronic with questions about the recall at 800-962-9888. Injuries and side effects can be reported to the FDA’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting system. Written by: Martha GarciaHealth & Medical Research WriterMartha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers. Tags: Battery, Burns, Explosion, Laryngoscope, Medical Device Recall, Medtronic Image Credit: iJeabMore Medtronic MiniMed Lawsuit Stories Medtronic MiniMed Insulin Pump Recall Over Battery Failure Risks October 7, 2024 FDA Issues “Do Not Use” Warning for Recalled Medtronic NIM Endotracheal Tubes July 10, 2024 Medfusion Syringe Pump Recall Issued Over Software Errors March 6, 2024 0 CommentsCommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (Posted: yesterday)Federal regulators have centralized at least 23 Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator lawsuits in a multidistrict litigation that excludes multiple similar claims involving Abbott and Nevro implants.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Malpractice Lawsuit Claims Device Left Veteran Partially Paralyzed (05/29/2026)Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Resulted in Severe Paralysis: Lawsuit (05/19/2026) Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: 4 days ago)A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit indicates that a woman suffered permanent and debilitating injuries after needing to have a brain tumor surgically removed.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Caused Meningioma 29 Years After First Birth Control Shots: Lawsuit (05/22/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Filings Exceed 6,000, As Court Prepares for First Test Trials (05/18/2026)Intracranial Meningioma from Depo-Provera Shots Caused Hearing Loss, Vision Loss: Lawsuit (05/12/2026) Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (Posted: 5 days ago)Regeneron and Sanofi-Aventis face a Dupixent injection lawsuit from a Louisiana woman who says the companies knew about the drug’s risks but downplayed them to doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Injection Lawsuits Consolidated in MDL Over CTCL Diagnoses (06/09/2026)Dupixent Cancer Lawsuit Claims Eczema Drug Caused Woman’s CTCL Diagnosis (05/28/2026)Link Between Dupixent and Cancer Withheld From Doctors and Users, Lawsuit Alleges (05/11/2026)
Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (Posted: yesterday)Federal regulators have centralized at least 23 Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator lawsuits in a multidistrict litigation that excludes multiple similar claims involving Abbott and Nevro implants.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Malpractice Lawsuit Claims Device Left Veteran Partially Paralyzed (05/29/2026)Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Resulted in Severe Paralysis: Lawsuit (05/19/2026)
Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: 4 days ago)A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit indicates that a woman suffered permanent and debilitating injuries after needing to have a brain tumor surgically removed.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Caused Meningioma 29 Years After First Birth Control Shots: Lawsuit (05/22/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Filings Exceed 6,000, As Court Prepares for First Test Trials (05/18/2026)Intracranial Meningioma from Depo-Provera Shots Caused Hearing Loss, Vision Loss: Lawsuit (05/12/2026)
Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (Posted: 5 days ago)Regeneron and Sanofi-Aventis face a Dupixent injection lawsuit from a Louisiana woman who says the companies knew about the drug’s risks but downplayed them to doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Injection Lawsuits Consolidated in MDL Over CTCL Diagnoses (06/09/2026)Dupixent Cancer Lawsuit Claims Eczema Drug Caused Woman’s CTCL Diagnosis (05/28/2026)Link Between Dupixent and Cancer Withheld From Doctors and Users, Lawsuit Alleges (05/11/2026)