Mesothelioma Lawsuits for Electricians Result in $25M Verdict

|

A New York jury has awarded a combined $25 million in mesothelioma injury lawsuits filed on behalf of two electricians against Crane Co., as a result of work with Crane valves and gaskets that included asbestos.

The trial involved claims filed on behalf of 72 year old Ivan Sweberg and Selwyn Hackshaw, who died last year at the age of 74. Both men worked as electricians and were diagnosed with mesothelioma cancer allegedly caused by exposure to asbestos.

The plaintiffs claimed that Crane Co. knowingly exposed electricians to the hazards of asbestos without adequately warning about the risks or taking reasonable steps to protect workers.

|
|

Following trial in New York state court, the jury awarded $15 million to Sweberg and $10 million to Hacksaw’s estate. However, it is unclear how much of the verdict Crane will actually have to pay, as the company was only found 9% liable in Sweberg’s case and 20% liable in Hackshaw’s. The company was found to have acted recklessly in both situations, which could increase the amount it has to pay.

Other defendants were originally part of the lawsuit, including Garlock Sealing Technologies, General Electric and Bell & Gossett Co. However, they all settled with the plaintiffs before the trial.

Mesothelioma is a rare form of cancer, which is only known to be caused by exposure to asbestos and breathing asbestos fibers. It is a lethal disease that is often at a very advanced stage when a diagnosis is made, resulting in a very short life-expectancy.

Mesothelioma lawsuits are the longest-running mass tort in U.S. history, with more than 600,000 people having filed a case against more than 6,000 defendants after being diagnosed with cancer that was allegedly caused by inhaling asbestos fibers.

In addition to claims for workers exposed to asbestos, in recent years there have been a growing number of secondary exposure mesothelioma cases have been brought in recent years, with wives, children and other family members alleging they developed the disease after breathing asbestos fibers brought home in the hair or on the clothing of individuals who worked directly with the material.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Plaintiffs and defendants involved in hair relaxer cancer lawsuits are expected to turn in a list of 12 cases that the parties believe are fit to serve as bellwether trials.
Cartiva implant lawsuits are moving forward in federal court as patients across the United States seek compensation for complications linked to the recalled big toe device.