Mirena IUD Lawsuit Filed Over Permanent Papilledema, Vision Problems

After receiving a Mirena intrauterine device (IUD) for long-term birth control, a Texas woman indicates that she developed severe headaches, vision problems and permanent papilledema due pseudotumor cerebri, which involves a build up of fluid pressure around the brain.

In a complaint (PDF) filed against Bayer Healthcare in the U.S. District Court in the Southern District of New York on July 7, Alyssa Johnson indicates that the manufacturer failed to warn consumers and the medical community about the risks associated with the Mirena IUD.

Johnson, 34, says that the birth control was implanted in May 2014 without complication. However, she was diagnosed in July 2015 with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), which is also known as pseudotumor cerebri (PTC). The fluid pressure around the brain caused swelling of the optic nerves, known as papilledema from Mirena, which has left Johnson with severe headaches and vision problems, which are expected to be permanent.

Did You Know?

Change Healthcare Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Change Healthcare data breach exposed the names, social security numbers, medical and personal information of potentially 100 million Americans, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

IIH/PTC is a serious medical condition, which has been linked to other birth control products. However, Mirena warnings failed to provide any indication that users may experience problems, or that they should seek immediate medication attention if vision issues or headaches develop.

While the fluid pressure around the brain can often be treated, if permanent optic nerve damage is suffered due to PTC/IIH, women may be left with blindness or other long-term complications.

The lawsuit indicates that Bayer knew or should have known that the Mirena could cause PTC/IIH.

“Despite the rarity of PTC/IIH, women who use levonorgestrel-containing products, like the Mirena® IUS, more commonly develop the disorder,” the lawsuit states. “The synthetic hormone released by Mirena, levonorgestrel, causes or contributes to the development of PTC/IIH, increases the risk of developing PTC/IIH, and/or worsens or exacerbates PTC/IIH.”

Johnson’s claim joins a growing number of Mirena IUD lawsuits filed in federal courts nationwide, each raising similar allegations that women may have avoided serious injuries if adequate information had been disclosed to consumers and the medical community.

In late April 2017, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) established coordinated pretrial proceedings for all cases brought by women diagnosed with PTC/IIH from the Mirena birth control implant, centralizing the claims before U.S. District Judge Paul A. Englemayer in the Southern District of New York.

As Mirena lawyers continue to review and file claims for women nationwide, it is expected that the size and scope of the litigation will continue to grow over the coming weeks and months.

As part of the coordinated pretrial proceedings, it is expected that Judge Englemayer will establish a bellwether program, where a small group of cases will be prepared for early trial dates to help gauge how juries may respond to certain evidence and testimony that is likely to be repeated throughout the litigation.

2 Comments

  • KimberlyOctober 13, 2020 at 3:30 am

    I began Yaz in 2002 and was diagnosed with papellidema in 2004. I am currently using Mirena, which was installed in 2011. I have maintained the condition for the past 16 years.

  • NeidiaJuly 12, 2017 at 3:52 am

    I was diagnosed with papilledema on December of 2015. Was on medication for a year.

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Plaintiffs Tell Court Manufacturers Have Not Turned Over Complete Details on Toxic Products
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Plaintiffs Tell Court Manufacturers Have Not Turned Over Complete Details on Toxic Products (Posted yesterday)

Status report on hair relaxer lawsuits reveals that plaintiffs are still awaiting key information about the ingredients contained in specific hair straighteners sold by cosmetics manufacturers, as part of the discovery process leading up to early bellwether trials.

Suboxone Film Lawsuit Highlights How Dental Decay Problems Continue To Be Reported Even After Label Change
Suboxone Film Lawsuit Highlights How Dental Decay Problems Continue To Be Reported Even After Label Change (Posted yesterday)

Updated warnings issued in June 2022 failed to adequately convey Suboxone’s risks of tooth decay, which has resulted in continuing reports of dental problems among users of the film strips, lawsuit indicates.