Mirena IUD Lawsuit Indicates Blurred Vision, Headaches, Back Pains Were Signs of PTC/IIH

A 40 year old woman indicates that she had to have a Mirena IUD birth control implant removed about two years after it was inserted, after suffering blurred vision, severe headaches, back pains and other symptoms of a medical condition known as pseudotumor cerebri (PTC), or idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). 

The complaint (PDF) was filed by Olushola Walker in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on March 1, indicating that Bayer Healthcare failed to warn about the risk that Mirena may cause the dangerous buildup of fluid in the skull, which acts similar to a brain tumor.

Walker indicates that a Mirena intrauterine device (IUD) was implanted without complications in July 2009, involving the placement the T-shaped device in the uterus to prevent pregnancy for up to five years. However, after suffering severe headaches, blurred vision, ringing in the ears, back pain and other problems, Walker was eventually hospitalized in October 2011.

Did You Know?

AT&T Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

More than 73 million customers of AT&T may have had their names, addresses, phone numbers, Social Security numbers and other information released on the dark web due to a massive AT&T data breach. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

After a CT scan filed to identify any evidence of an acute intracranial abnormality, Walker underwent a diagnostic lumbar puncture a month later to evaluated increased intracranial pressure. About a week later, she was diagnosed with PTC/IIH during a follow up exam

According to allegations raised in the complaint, the problems were caused by the Mirena IUD, which releases the progestin levonorgestrel, which has been linked to a risk of PTC/IIH in other birth control produces. However, the Mirena warnings failed to adequately warn women and doctors about the need to monitor for symptoms after the IUD is implanted, or about the importance of promptly removing the device to avoid permanent damage to the optic nerve.

“Mirena is a defective and unreasonably dangerous product, because its labeling fails to adequately warn consumers and prescribers of, among other things, the increased risk of developing IIH/PTC,” Walker’s lawsuit states. “Mirena was under the exclusive control of Defendants and was unaccompanied by appropriate warnings regarding all of the risks associated with its use.”

Walker’s complaint joins a growing number of similar Mirena IUD lawsuits filed nationwide by women who suffered intracranial hypertension or pseudotumor cerebri, often resulting in vision loss and other injuries associated with damage to the optic nerve caused by the fluid pressure around the brain.

Given similar questions of fact and law raised in complaints filed throughout the federal court system, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) established coordinated pretrial proceedings in April 2017, centralizing all cases involving pseudotumor cerebri or intracranial hypertension complications from Mirena IUDs before one judge in the Southern District of New York.

There are currently more than 200 complaints pending before U.S. District Judge Paul A. Englemayer as part of an MDL, or multidistrict litigation. However, as Mirena injury lawyers continue to review and file claims for women nationwide, it is expected that the size and scope of the litigation will continue to grow over the coming weeks and months.

3 Comments

  • BarbaraMay 2, 2022 at 2:16 pm

    had the Murina IUD placed in July 2021. I have just returned to work from being on disabilty from the side effects of this device. It really should not be used, the progestin is very toxic. I am working with a blind center now with a functional impairment (blurred double vision, nystagmus), and two types of vertigo. that i can directly relate to this product. Daily debilitating migraines, ringing[Show More]had the Murina IUD placed in July 2021. I have just returned to work from being on disabilty from the side effects of this device. It really should not be used, the progestin is very toxic. I am working with a blind center now with a functional impairment (blurred double vision, nystagmus), and two types of vertigo. that i can directly relate to this product. Daily debilitating migraines, ringing in my ears, severe back pain. I now use a walker the pain in back and hips is unbearable.

  • ChristinaMarch 28, 2022 at 11:40 am

    I had mirena iud placed in October 2020. And have nothing but problems since. I bled for 7 months straight. Had Imaging done twice to make sure the iud was placed properly. Now I bleed monthly very dark blood almost tar like and bad cramping, I have sever right side low back and hip pain. I started going to a chiropractor 3 times a week to help with pain, but little to no relief and it's been 3 m[Show More]I had mirena iud placed in October 2020. And have nothing but problems since. I bled for 7 months straight. Had Imaging done twice to make sure the iud was placed properly. Now I bleed monthly very dark blood almost tar like and bad cramping, I have sever right side low back and hip pain. I started going to a chiropractor 3 times a week to help with pain, but little to no relief and it's been 3 months. I'm going to get it removed because the pain is unbearable

  • NatashaMarch 28, 2021 at 4:00 am

    I have lower back pain and foul smelling discharge after having Morena inserted about a year ago. I have also had severe bleeding.

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

AT&T Data Breach Class Action Claims Telecom Giant
AT&T Data Breach Class Action Claims Telecom Giant "Disregarded" Customer Financial Safety (Posted today)

A Missouri woman is one of the latest person to file an class action claim over the AT&T data breach, after the telecom company admitted that hackers stole millions of customers' personal information and sold it on the internet.

Plaintiffs Oppose Phased Discovery Over Suboxone Tooth Decay Risks in MDL
Plaintiffs Oppose Phased Discovery Over Suboxone Tooth Decay Risks in MDL (Posted yesterday)

Plaintiffs say a federal judge should not waste time on a phased discovery plan requiring them to first prove Suboxone strips can cause tooth decay, saying the science is obvious and such a plan could delay resolution of hundreds of product liability lawsuits.