Nesina Heart Failure Side Effects Require Warning Update: FDA Panel

|

A panel of expert advisors to the FDA is recommending that new warning labels be added to the diabetes drug Nesina, indicating that side effects may include an increased risk of heart failure.

In a 13 to 3 vote, members of the FDA’s Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee determined that the stronger warnings were required, but the panel did not recommend additional restrictions on the drug. The same panel voted to add similar heart failure warnings to Onglyza, a related diabetes drug sold by AstraZeneca.

Nesina (alogliptin) is a Takeda Pharmaceuticals medication approved in 2013 for treatment of diabetes. The drug is part of a class of incretin mimetics, known as DPP-4 inhibitors, which also include Onglyza and Merck’s Januvia.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

The FDA advisory panel made its decision based off the results of a clinical trial known as EXAMINE. With similar warnings added to the drug Onglyza, some members of the panel raised the possibility about a potential risk of heart problems with Nesina and an increased risk of death that may be associated with side effects of all DPP-4 inhibitors.

The results of a clinical trial on Januvia, known as the TECOS trial, are expected in June.

The FDA advisory panel determined that the potential heart risks were not severe enough to warrant restrictions or a Nesina recall, but urged new warnings. While the panel’s recommendations are not binding on the FDA, they are usually factored into any regulatory actions taken by the agency.

A report released a year ago by AdverseEvents.com found that out of a number of fairly new diabetes drugs, Nesina appears to be the one with the highest percentage of adverse events by doctors and patients. However, they noted that could be an effect of the actual low Nesina sales numbers at the time. Januvia and Janumet actually had the highest number of actual complaints, but they also have very large sales numbers.

The study also looked at pancreatic cancer concerns with incretin mimetic diabetes drugs, finding that the adverse event reports support recent claims that the medications pose an carry risk of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer, despite some reports which say there is no increased risk.

AdverseEvents.com found that DPP-4 inhibitors, which include Janumet, Januvia and Nesina, had โ€œhigh disproportionality results for both pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.โ€

A number of Byetta lawsuits, Januvia Lawsuits, Janumet lawsuits and Victoza lawsuits are currently pending in courts throughout the country involving similar incretin mimetic diabetes drugs, alleging that the makers of those medications failed to adequately warn about the risk that users may develop pancreatic cancer.

The incretin mimetic litigation pending throughout the federal court system has been consolidated as part of an MDL, or Multidistrict Litigation, which is centralized before U.S. District Judge Anthony J. Battalglia in the Southern District of California to reduce duplicative discover, avoid conflicting pretrial rulings from different judges and to serve the convenience of the parties, witnesses and the courts.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

In a joint statement, plaintiffs and defendants in AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits have laid guidelines for what types of cases should be selected to serve as potential bellwether trials.
Women who experienced infection, chronic inflammation, implant instability or other complications after internal bra mesh procedures are now questioning whether those risks were fully disclosed before implantation.
More than 3,300 women have filed Depo-Provera lawsuits in federal court, with several hundred more also pending in state courts in New York and Delaware, according to a recent status report.