Nevada Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Damages Cap Being Challenged

The family of a Nevada woman who died due to a medical misdiagnosis is preparing to challenge the state’s cap on damages in medical malpractice lawsuits. 

The wrongful death lawsuit was filed by the family of Adeline Villegas, who died in August 2007 of a ruptured ulcer and peritonitis after being misdiagnosed by Dr. Mahmud A. Sheikh as pancreatitis. The lawsuit was brought in 2008 against both Sheikh and Spring Valley Hospital.

The family’s lawsuit ran into the state’s medical malpractice cap of $350,000 on non-economic damages, which defense attorneys argue is the amount that would have to be divided among Villegas’s husband and six children. The plaintiffs are challenging that interpretation, saying that the cap should apply to each individual claimant, which would raise the amount awarded for pain and suffering to $5.6 million. They are also ready to challenge the constitutionality of the entire malpractice damage cap if the court does not agree with their interpretation of how the cap should be applied.

Did You Know?

AT&T Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

More than 73 million customers of AT&T may have had their names, addresses, phone numbers, Social Security numbers and other information released on the dark web due to a massive AT&T data breach. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

About 30 states currently have damage caps in some form, but they have increasingly been challenged by plaintiffs with medical malpractice lawsuits. State Supreme Courts in Illinois and Georgia have thrown out similar damages caps over the last year, saying that the imposition of caps by the state legislatures violated the plaintiffs’ rights to a trial by jury, since the cap overrode the jury’s judgment on what the compensation for those cases should be.

Physicians in Nevada say that the caps keep their insurance premiums down and keep doctors from fleeing the state. However, a recent high-profile Hepatitis C outbreak involving a Las Vegas endoscopy clinic has cast physicians in the state in a negative light, and may result in a court that is unsympathetic to their cause.

The current Nevada malpractice caps were approved by voters in a 2004 campaign by physicians across the state.

California was the first state to enact a damage cap in 1975, specifically limiting the non-economic damages in medical malpractice lawsuits. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, as of 2005 ten states capped recoveries specifically on medical malpractice cases and another 22 have caps that are not limited to medical malpractice. About a dozen states also have caps on punitive damages.


  • steveApril 2, 2011 at 12:44 am

    there should be no cap if you kill someone .if doctors want to leave nevada don't let the door hit you.there are plenty of qualified doctors who wpould love to live here and ski tahoe.

  • HollzyNovember 12, 2010 at 7:59 pm

    How can u predict the future of damages from a medical mistake this person/ persons may need medical attention for the thirty forty years? at the lease there should be a 10 % cost of living added to the law suite to keep up with rising cost and inflation for the poor soul that got screwed up.

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

BioZorb Lawsuit Alleges Breast Tissue Marker Failed, Requiring Surgical Removal
BioZorb Lawsuit Alleges Breast Tissue Marker Failed, Requiring Surgical Removal (Posted 2 days ago)

A BioZorb lawsuit has been filed by several breast cancer survivors after the BioZorb implants moved out of place and failed to dissolve int he body, requiring surgical removal.

Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October
Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October (Posted 2 days ago)

A U.S. District Court judge has scheduled a fairness hearing for October in order to determine whether final approval should be granted to a $25 million Philips CPAP recall settlement agreement, which would pay former users $25 million to pay for future medical monitoring needs.