Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
New Safety Standards Introduced to Address Risk of Children Swallowing High-Powered MagnetsCPSC hopes to prevent child deaths due to swallowing high-powered magnets. September 12, 2022 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsIn response to continuing problems with children suffering severe and potentially life-threatening injuries after swallowing high powered magnets, federal regulators have approved new standards which call for separable magnets to be too large for children to swallow, or be made with weaker magnetic fields.The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced the new federal safety standard for magnet products September 7, as part of years-long effort to reduce the risks posed by a number of products sold with small, powerful magnets.The magnets are often found in adult desk toys or building sets, containing pieces that can be connected to form various shapes and designs. However, many children have been left with devastating injuries after accidentally swallowing the magnets while attempting to simulate pierced tongues or attracting the magnets through their cheeks.When high-powered magnets are swallowed, they can attract to each other and other material, even through internal body tissue and across the intestinal tract. This can cut off the blood supply to various organs and lead to serious injuries, such as perforations to the intestine, twisting, blocked intestines, infections, blood poisoning and death.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe new federal standard requires loose or separable magnets in certain magnet products be made too large to swallow, or be magnetically weak, to avoid the risk of internal injuries when swallowed. If the magnets fit in a small parts cylinder, they must have a flux index (how magnet strength is measured) of less than 50 kG2 mm2.In 2014, the CPSC issued a mandatory federal standard for high-powered toy magnet sets, banning them from the market. However, the US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit overturned the ban in 2016, indicating the CPSC did not have enough data to show the magnets were unsafe, allowing the sale of magnet sets to continue.Theย toy magnet safety rules, enacted in October 2014, came after several battles with manufacturers to get them to recall products after the CPSC determined that warnings provided were insufficient to avoid injuries. One of the magnet manufacturers, Zen Magnets, LLC, protested the new rules, and challenged them in court and won.High-Powered Magnets’ Risks to ChildrenAccording to aย magnet information centerย website published by the CPSC, nearly 3,000 children and teenagers swallowed the magnets and had to be treated in emergency rooms nationwide between 2009 and 2013, including the death of a 19-month girl, Annaka Chaffin, after accidentally swallowing the magnets.Research published in 2021 found that the reversal of the magnet ban led to an increase in magnet ingestions and injuries. Data indicates the injuries increased more than 400% with the majority of the injuries occurring in 2018 and 2019.The CPSC reports more than 26,000 magnet ingestions were treated in hospital emergency rooms from 2010 to 2021. The cases have continued to rise every year since 2018, and have resulted in at least seven deaths from magnet ingestions; mostly involving toy magnet sets.The new CPSC rule applies to magnet products with one or more loose or separable magnets designed or intended for entertainment, jewelry, mental stimulation, stress relief, or a combination of these purposes. The federal rule does not apply to toys for children under 14 years old, because they are already part of a CPSC mandatory toy standards.The CPSC said the magnets present an unreasonable risk of injury, and other measures implemented to reduce the risk to children and teens have been ineffective in helping to persuade children and teens to avoid the hazard. The injuries happen to both children and teens, not just young children. Some teens use the magnets to mimic mouth piercings and unintentionally swallow them.The commission voted 5 to 0 to approve the mandatory standard. The rule goes into effect 30 days after publication in the Federal Register and applies to magnet products manufactured after that date. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Child Death, Children, Infant Death, Magnets, Zen MagnetsMore Lawsuit Stories Nevro SCS Lawsuits Warrant Centralization in New MDL: Motion July 8, 2026 Amazon Heated Socks Lawsuit Claims Defective Battery Combusted Resulting in House Fire July 8, 2026 Taxotere Watery Eyes Lawsuits Cleared To Move Forward Over Inadequate Side Effect Warnings July 8, 2026 0 Comments InstagramThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Nevro SCS Lawsuits Warrant Centralization in New MDL: Motion (Posted: yesterday)Plaintiffs have requested that the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidate all Nevro spinal cord stimulator lawsuits in the Central District of California for pretrial procedures.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITProclaim Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Follows Infection, Battery Migration Problems (07/06/2026)MDL Sought for Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits (06/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges WaveWriter Alpha Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Caused Burning, Shocking Sensations (06/24/2026) Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (Posted: 2 days ago)An AngioDynamics Vortex port lawsuit alleges the implantable port catheter caused a South Carolina woman to suffer pulmonary embolisms and a serious infection requiring surgical removal.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITAngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Claims Womanโs SmartPort Implants Caused Multiple Infections (06/23/2026)Xcela Port Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Caused Thrombosis (06/12/2026)Port Catheter Thrombosis Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Xcela Device Caused Injury (06/03/2026) Proclaim Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Follows Infection, Battery Migration Problems (Posted: 3 days ago)A Texas man’s lawsuit claims the electrodes and battery of an Abbott spinal cord stimulator tried to push out of his skin, resulting in a severe infection and the need for surgical removal.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro SCS Lawsuits Warrant Centralization in New MDL: Motion (07/08/2026)MDL Sought for Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits (06/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges WaveWriter Alpha Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Caused Burning, Shocking Sensations (06/24/2026)
Taxotere Watery Eyes Lawsuits Cleared To Move Forward Over Inadequate Side Effect Warnings July 8, 2026
Nevro SCS Lawsuits Warrant Centralization in New MDL: Motion (Posted: yesterday)Plaintiffs have requested that the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidate all Nevro spinal cord stimulator lawsuits in the Central District of California for pretrial procedures.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITProclaim Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Follows Infection, Battery Migration Problems (07/06/2026)MDL Sought for Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits (06/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges WaveWriter Alpha Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Caused Burning, Shocking Sensations (06/24/2026)
Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (Posted: 2 days ago)An AngioDynamics Vortex port lawsuit alleges the implantable port catheter caused a South Carolina woman to suffer pulmonary embolisms and a serious infection requiring surgical removal.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITAngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Claims Womanโs SmartPort Implants Caused Multiple Infections (06/23/2026)Xcela Port Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Caused Thrombosis (06/12/2026)Port Catheter Thrombosis Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Xcela Device Caused Injury (06/03/2026)
Proclaim Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Follows Infection, Battery Migration Problems (Posted: 3 days ago)A Texas man’s lawsuit claims the electrodes and battery of an Abbott spinal cord stimulator tried to push out of his skin, resulting in a severe infection and the need for surgical removal.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro SCS Lawsuits Warrant Centralization in New MDL: Motion (07/08/2026)MDL Sought for Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits (06/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges WaveWriter Alpha Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Caused Burning, Shocking Sensations (06/24/2026)