Ohio Cerebral Palsy Lawsuit Results in Record $31M Verdict

An Ohio jury awarded $31 million in compensatory damages last week to the family of a child who developed cerebral palsy as result of a birth injury allegedly caused by medical negligence.

The complaint was filed on behalf of 8-year-old Leondo Stanziano, who was born on December 11, 2000 at Miami Valley Hospital in Dayton, Ohio.

The jury found that the child suffered permanent brain damage resulting in cerebral palsy after being deprived of oxygen for 18 to 20 minutes during delivery. He now suffers from severe cerebral palsy, which has left him unable to speak, unable to walk and requiring 24-hour care.

Did You Know?

Ticketmaster Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Ticketmaster data breach exposed the names, addresses, phone numbers, credit card numbers and other personal information of more than 560 million customers, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

Cerebral palsy is a life-long disability, which involves disorders of movement control and muscle coordination. It is caused by brain damage that occurs before, during or immediately after birth, and it is commonly associated with seizures, sensory impairments and cognitive limitation.

Although the Ohio malpractice lawsuit was filed against Miami Valley Hospital, Dr. Kendrin E. Van Steenwyk and Contemporary Obstetrics and Gynecology, the jury found that only the hospital’s negligence was to blame for the child’s birth injury. The family argued that hospital staff knew that the mother, Renetha Stanziano, was at a high risk for a ruptured uterus during labor, but did not properly monitor the infant and improperly used the labor-inducing drug Pitocin even after her uterus had become hyper-stimulated, causing it to rupture.

The jury award, which was returned on July 2, 2009, is believed to be the largest ever returned for a medical malpractice lawsuit in Ohio.

According to the Dayton Daily News, it is unlikely the hospital will have to pay the full amount of the verdict, as the parties reached a confidential settlement agreement, which will avoid lengthy appeals and the punitive damages phase of the cerebral palsy lawsuit.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Port Catheter Infection Lawsuits Over Bard PowerPort Devices Claim Faulty Design Promotes Colonization of Bacteria
Port Catheter Infection Lawsuits Over Bard PowerPort Devices Claim Faulty Design Promotes Colonization of Bacteria (Posted today)

Hundreds of currently pending Bard PowerPort lawsuits over infections, fractures and migration injuries were consolidated into a multidistrict litigation (MDL), but now even more claims present similar allegations that the implantable port catheter system has dangerous design defects that were not adequately disclosed by the manufacturer.

Johnson & Johnson Increases Talcum Powder Settlement Offer by $1.1B: Reuters
Johnson & Johnson Increases Talcum Powder Settlement Offer by $1.1B: Reuters (Posted today)

A recent report suggests that Johnson & Johnson is offering an additional $1.1 billion to settle talcum powder lawsuits, as part of a proposed $9 billion deal that would resolve all ovarian cancer claims as part of a third bankruptcy filing by the manufacturer.

Ozempic MDL Court To Evaluate Need for Gastroparesis Diagnostic Testing in GLP-1 Lawsuits
Ozempic MDL Court To Evaluate Need for Gastroparesis Diagnostic Testing in GLP-1 Lawsuits (Posted 3 days ago)

A federal judge has agreed to divide lawsuits over gastroparesis injuries linked to drugs like Ozempic and Mounjaro into multiple phases, examining how the condition is diagnosed and whether plaintiffs' claims are preempted by federal laws.