JPML To Hear Oral Arguments Over Onglyza Lawsuit Consolidation

|

A panel of federal judges will hear oral arguments next month, to consider whether all Onglyza lawsuits filed in U.S. District Courts nationwide should be consolidated before one judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings, as a growing number of complaints continue to be filed by individuals who allege that the diabetes drug caused heart failure and other medical problems.ย 

There are currently at least 42 product liability lawsuits pending in the federal court system, each raising similar allegations that the manufacturer failed to adequately warn about the potential side effects of Onglyza on the heart.

Claims have been brought by users Onglyza, as well as the combination drug Kombiglyze XR, which includes the active ingredient in Onglyza together with the older diabetes drug metformin.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

Onglyza (saxagliptin) was introduce for treatment of type 2 diabetes in 2009, but heart safety concerns have emerged in recent years, leading the FDA to require stronger label warnings. Plaintiffs allege that AstraZeneca knew or should have known about the risk for years, yet failed to adequately warn users and the medical community about the diabetes drug’s heart failure risks.

In October, a group of plaintiffs filed a request with the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML),ย seeking to consolidate all Onglyza casesย before one judge for coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings in the Northern District of California.

AstraZeneca opposes consolidation, maintaining that there are not enough cases at this time to justify centralization.

According to a Notice of Hearing Session (PDF) recently issued by the U.S. JPML, oral arguments will be considered on January 25, at the Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. U.S. Courthouse in Miami, Florida.

Onglyza Heart Failure Risks

The Onglyza litigation emerged after a series of steps taken by federal drug regulators to review the heart failure risks associated with the medication.

The FDA launched anย investigation into the potential heart problems with Onglyzaย in 2014, following the publication of the aย 2013 study in theย New England Journal of Medicine.

In April 2015, the FDAโ€™s Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee voted 14-1 to recommendย stronger warnings about the potential Onglyza heart risks, after a review of data from clinical trials suggested that users may face a higher than expected risk of hospitalization for heart failure and all-cause mortality.

The review looked at two large clinical trials involving patients with heart disease. In both trials, patients given drugs containing saxagliptin or alogliptin were at a higher risk of being hospitalized for heart failure than those given a placebo.

The FDA now recommends that health care professionals consider a different medication if an individual develops heart failure on Onglyza or Kombiglyze XR.

As Onglyza lawyers continue to review and file additional cases over the coming months, it is widely expected that a steadily increasing number of claims may be filed in U.S. District Courts nationwide.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Plaintiffs and defendants involved in hair relaxer cancer lawsuits are expected to turn in a list of 12 cases that the parties believe are fit to serve as bellwether trials.
Cartiva implant lawsuits are moving forward in federal court as patients across the United States seek compensation for complications linked to the recalled big toe device.
An Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuit filed by three women says the product was defectively designed, inappropriately approved by the FDA, and left them with severe injuries, worsening pain and the need for removal surgery.