Skip Navigation

Eligible for a Ozempic, Wegovy and Mounjaro lawsuit?

Gastrointestinal Problems Are Most Common GLP-1 Side Effects, Study Finds

Gastrointestinal Problems Are Most Common GLP-1 Side Effects, Study Finds

Chinese researchers say they conducted the largest and most comprehensive review to date on the side effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists, finding strong evidence linking the drugs to gastrointestinal issues, while other potential safety concerns remained less clear.

The findings were published in JAMA Network Open on March 31, indicating that gastrointestinal problems, including stomach paralysis and bowel obstruction, are the most common complaints by those taking diabetes and weight loss drugs like Ozempic, Mounjaro and Wegovy.

GLP-1 Medications

First created to treat Type 2 diabetes, GLP-1 medications, including Ozempic, Mounjaro, Wegovy, Zepbound, Trulicity, Rybelsus and others, have grown significantly in popularity after they became linked with significant weight loss and beneficial metabolic effects.

However, the findings of a study published in October 2023, linked GLP-1 medications to triple the risk of gastroparesis, or stomach paralysis, compared to non-injectable weight loss medications. In the aftermath, thousands of Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits, Mounjaro lawsuits and other GLP-1 stomach paralysis complaints have been filed by users nationwide.

In addition, a growing number of other lawsuits have been brought in recent months after some of the medications, specifically Ozempic and Wegovy, were linked to GLP-1 vision loss side effects. Plaintiffs say these side effects, being discovered years after the products were placed on the market, are signs the manufacturers either failed to properly test the drugs, or failed to provide adequate warnings about the potential health risks.

Ozempic Lawsuit
Ozempic Lawsuit

GLP-1 Side Effects Study

The new study, led by Dr. Kaijie Yang of First Hospital of China Medical University, involved a review of 60 different meta-analyses of 1,751 randomized clinical trials involving about three million participants. The researchers combed data for incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events, cancer, fractures, respiratory problems, psychiatric side effects, liver problems and other potential complications.

The findings showed the most consistent risks involved gastrointestinal issues, with roughly double the likelihood of nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. While researchers identified some signals suggesting a possible link to pancreatitis, evidence for other side effects, such as gallbladder or biliary disease, was less clear.

The analysis also suggested that GLP-1 medications may offer some protective effects against infections, respiratory diseases, bone fractures and dementia, while findings related to cancer remained inconclusive.

โ€œGLP-1 RAs continue to be a cornerstone of antidiabetic therapy but should not be misconstrued as a panacea. The complex profile that emerged from our findings was characterized by potential neuroprotective and respiratory benefits coexisting with safety signals related to gastrointestinal events, such as nausea and vomiting.โ€

– Dr. Kaijie Yang, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Noncardiometabolic Outcomes

The researchers concluded that the findings make it clear that doctors should approach GLP-1 use as part of individualized therapeutic strategies instead of just being prescribed routinely.

GLP-1 Stomach Paralysis Lawsuits

Drug makers Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly currently face more than 3,300 GLP-1 stomach paralysis lawsuits filed in federal courts nationwide, with plaintiffs claiming to have suffered severe injuries due to the delayed gastric emptying effects of the medications.

These claims are consolidated into a multidistrict litigation in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, where U.S. District Judge Karen Marston is overseeing coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings.

Judge Marston is working with the parties to select a small group of representative cases for bellwether trials, which will allow the parties to gauge how juries may respond to evidence and testimony likely to recur across thousands of similar claims.

GLP-1 Vision Loss Lawsuits

Similarly, Judge Marston is also overseeing a consolidated MDL of GLP-1 vision loss lawsuits, which consists of dozens of claims. These lawsuits began to be filed after a series of studies linked semaglutide-based drugs, like Ozempic, Wegovy and Rybelsus, to a condition known as non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION).

The condition can cause rapid onset of blurred or reduced vision, including blindness. Resulting in optic nerve damage, NAION occurs suddenly and the vision loss is often permanent. More than 50 GLP-1 vision loss lawsuits have already been filed by patients facing such injuries.

The judge is expected to also guide these cases through coordinated discovery, pretrial proceedings and a group of bellwether trials as well.

While the outcomes of these trials will not be binding on other claims for either condition, they will be closely watched to see what kinds of payouts juries award to plaintiffs, which are likely to have a significant impact on negotiations. However, if no settlement is reached following the bellwether trials, Judge Marston is likely to remand the cases back to their originating districts for individual trial dates.

To stay up to date on this litigation, sign up for GLP-1 lawsuit updates to be delivered directly to your inbox.

Irvin Jackson
Written By: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.



1 Comments


Catherine
Thanks to Irvin Jackson for this vital report just as Medicare lowers the cost of GLP-1 drugs with a public stampede to obtain them. The studies remain inconclusive regarding long-term side effects despite the alarming lawsuits. While it may be too early to determine the drugs’ impacts on bone, the gallbladder and other organs, common sense suggests it might only be a matter of time. The increasing lawsuits certainly prompt a deeper examination of the drugs and the studies themselves. The JAMA study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, which receives funding from drug companies as most studies do. The integrity of the collaboration is confirmed by the authors to ensure no conflict of interest, but curious minds wonder about the integrity of the GLP-1 drug process. Further examination of the 89 citations shows varying results but an inconclusive consensus… it’s still too early to determine the long-range effects. The studies explain that the drugs work by gastroparesis. No surprise that such an artificial mechanism often results in gastrointestinal problems, but it leaves a lot of questions. What happens when tachyphylaxisis sets in? Does such restriction burn muscle and subcutaneous fat instead of visceral and ectopic fat? Are GLP-1 drugs bypassing the need for doctors to do their diagnostic homework and identify the root causes of obesity, insulin resistance and Type 2 diabetes? Are they preventing the impetus for necessary lifestyle modifications that could alleviate these conditions? Are the drugs a band-aid or cure? While the defending argument may be about saving a life threatened by diabetes or heart disease, the lingering question is: What other lethal malady might take its place? Is the GLP-1 obsession just another drug deja vu of the opioid crisis that could result in a new health epidemic? What happens when large numbers of patients remain anorexic hostages on these drugs for the long haul out of fear of regaining the weight or diabetes? What happens when they stop taking the drug? As the study concludes: “These findings reinforce the necessity of individualized therapeutic strategies and sustained clinical vigilance rather than routine practice change.” Time will tell what happens to GLP-1 patients, but perusing those 89 studies leaves a sense of serious health repercussions and more lawsuits on the way.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A Dupixent CTCL lawsuit indicates manufacturers have long known the eczema treatment was linked to an increased cancer risk, but failed to warn doctors or patients.
Manufacturer wants the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to reject a proposal by a group of plaintiffs to consolidate all federal Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuits.
A Pennsylvania man has filed an AngioDynamics SmartPort lawsuit alleging catheter defects promoted bacterial growth, causing a severe infection and sepsis only weeks after implantation.