ParaGard Removal Problems Left Woman With Piece of Copper IUD Missing Inside Her Body, Lawsuit Alleges

According to allegations raised in a recently filed product liability lawsuit, a Georgia woman indicates her doctors experienced problems removing Paragard birth control, when the copper IUD fractured and broke inside her body, leaving small pieces missing which pose a continuing health risk.

Heather Spence filed the complaint (PDF) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia on September 3, indicating Teva Pharmaceuticals, The Cooper Companies, Inc., and Coopersurgical, Inc. sold a reversible birth control implant prone to break at the arms when it is removed.

ParaGard is a copper intrauterine device (IUD) intended for long-term birth control up to 10 years, which is intended to be removable and allow women to conceive after it is explanted.

Learn More About

Paragard IUD Lawsuits

Women have reported problems where Paragard IUD fractured or broken during removal, resulting in serious injury.

Learn More About this Lawsuit SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION

The implant involves a T-shaped plastic frame, wrapped with copper wire coils designed to produce an inflammatory reaction in the uterus toxic to sperm, preventing pregnancy. However, hundreds of women have experienced painful and debilitating Paragard removal problems when the device fractured during explant procedures, often resulting in the need for a hysterectomy or other invasive surgery to retrieve the IUD.

According to the lawsuit, Spence had a ParaGard IUD implanted in 2011. However, when she went to have it removed in June 2020, both Paragard IUD “arms” broke off inside of her uterus. Attempts to remove the debris using ultrasound as a guide failed, and the ParaGard arms remain inside of Spence’s body, and will require she undergo additional medical procedures.

“Prior to her procedures, Plaintiff and her doctors were provided with no warning from the Defendants of the risk of ParaGard IUD failure and injury, nor were Plaintiff and her doctors provided with adequate warning of the risk of removal of ParaGard IUD,” the lawsuit notes. “This information was known or knowable to the Defendants.”

Spence’s lawsuit presents claims of negligence, defective design, defective manufacturing, failure to warn, common law fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of warranty, gross negligence, and violation of state consumer protection laws. She seeks both compensatory and punitive damages.

The case joins a growing number of Paragard IUD lawsuits filed in recent months, each involving similar allegations of problems during removal surgery.

2 Comments

  • JuneSeptember 20, 2021 at 7:04 pm

    I have just found out the exact same information yesterday from my doctor after surgery to remove and complete a DNC as well as ablation but cannot find the arms that connect to the IUD. The doctor (Obgyn) has never came across issue before and I am very concerned about where I should go from here and how can this disappearance may effect my health in the future … very worried

  • RachelOctober 10, 2020 at 11:43 pm

    I am dealing with that right now! Had mine put in 2011, had it removed in august of this year and the right arm broke into my lower right quadrant of my cervix. Doctor could not remove it as it was too far in, tried during surgery on October 1st and now they cannot find the IUD arm. I have to wait 6 weeks (healing from leep surgery) before they can do a scan of my body to see where the arm has wen[Show More]I am dealing with that right now! Had mine put in 2011, had it removed in august of this year and the right arm broke into my lower right quadrant of my cervix. Doctor could not remove it as it was too far in, tried during surgery on October 1st and now they cannot find the IUD arm. I have to wait 6 weeks (healing from leep surgery) before they can do a scan of my body to see where the arm has went.

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

BioZorb Lawsuit Alleges Breast Tissue Marker Failed, Requiring Surgical Removal
BioZorb Lawsuit Alleges Breast Tissue Marker Failed, Requiring Surgical Removal (Posted 2 days ago)

A BioZorb lawsuit has been filed by several breast cancer survivors after the BioZorb implants moved out of place and failed to dissolve int he body, requiring surgical removal.

Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October
Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October (Posted 2 days ago)

A U.S. District Court judge has scheduled a fairness hearing for October in order to determine whether final approval should be granted to a $25 million Philips CPAP recall settlement agreement, which would pay former users $25 million to pay for future medical monitoring needs.