Paraquat Attorneys Appointed to Leadership Roles in Federal MDL

As a growing number of Paraquat lawsuits continue to be filed in the federal court system by farmers and agricultural workers diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease, the U.S. District Judge presiding over the litigation has appointed a group of 17 plaintiffs attorneys to serve in various leadership positions during the coordinated pretrial proceedings.

There are currently at least 150 claims filed against Syngenta and Chevron over failure to warn users that exposure to the controversial grass and weed killer may cause Parkinsons. However, as Paraquat injury attorneys continue to review and file claim sin the coming months and years, it is ultimately expected that the litigation will include several thousand claims.

Given common questions of fact and law raised in the litigation, the lawsuits were recently consolidated for pretrial proceedings in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, where Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel will preside over coordinated discovery in the Paraquat MDL (multi-district litigation).

PARAQUAT Parkinson's Lawsuits

Were you or a loved one exposed to Paraquat?

Lawyers are reviewing Paraquat lawsuits for individuals who were exposed to Paraquat and developed Parkinson's disease.

Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION

In a court order (PDF) issued on July 6, Judge Rosenstengel appointed three plaintiff’s attorneys to serve as co-lead counsel, and 14 attorneys to serve as the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee (PEC). Two of the PEC members will also serve as liaisons between the state and federal courts.

These attorneys serving in leadership roles will perform various tasks during the discovery process and meetings with the Court, including arguing motions, taking depositions of common witnesses, reviewing discovery documents and other actions that benefit all cases in the litigation. However, each plaintiff will still maintain their own lawyer to represent their specific interests in their claims against Paraquat manufacturers.

In another case management order (PDF) issued the same day, Judge Rosenstengel also announced that she will be appointing a Special Master to attempt to help the parties resolve issues and potentially reach an eventual Paraquat settlement to resolve the cases.

Because of the quantity and complexity of these related cases, and the common interest in a fair and expeditious resolution, the Court has determined that it would be beneficial to appoint a special master, at the expense of the parties, to assist the Court,” wrote Judge Rosenstengel in the order, which proposes Randi S. Ellis as the special master, indicating that she has worked with the Court on mass tort cases in the past.

Judge Rosenstengel indicated she will accept objections to the appointment of Ellis until July 13.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Status Conference To Be Held With MDL Judge This Week
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Status Conference To Be Held With MDL Judge This Week (Posted today)

U.S. District Judge presiding over all federal hair relaxer lawsuits will meet with lawyers involved in the litigation on Thursday, to discuss the status of the claims and when to move forward with bellwether cases.

Lawyers Propose MDL Trial Dates for Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit Starting in May 2025
Lawyers Propose MDL Trial Dates for Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit Starting in May 2025 (Posted yesterday)

A series of four bellwether claims in the baby formula NEC lawsuit MDL will be ready to go before a federal juries in May 2025, August 2025, November 2025 and February 2026 according to a proposed trial schedule agreed upon by both plaintiffs and defendants.