Skip Navigation

Federal Lawmakers Seek Paraquat Ban Amid Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits and Settlements

A bipartisan pair of lawmakers want the U.S. to ban the use of Paraquat and to set a โ€œzero toleranceโ€ policy for the weedkillerโ€™s residue in food, amid continuing concerns about the risk of Parkinson’s disease and other injuries linked to the herbicide.

U.S. Representatives Anna Paulina Luna, a Republican from Florida, and Chellie Pingree, a Maine Democrat, introduced legislation in the House on June 18 calling for passage of the Paraquat Prevention Act (PDF). If passed, the legislation would cancel the registration of all Paraquat products in the U.S. and permanently ban their re-registration.

With its introduction only days ago, it is too early yet to see how the legislation will be received. However, the bill has garnered support from both left-leaning environmental groups and supporters of the mostly conservative Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement, who want to see large reductions in pesticide exposure through food.

Paraquat Parkinsonโ€™s Disease Risks

Paraquat was originally introduced in 1964 under the brand name Gramoxone. It is a powerful, highly toxic herbicide that is still widely used in the U.S. to kill broadleaf weeds and grasses before crops are planted. It is also used as a desiccant to dry out some harvested crops before processing.

However, the lawmakers point to growing scientific evidence about the link between Paraquat and Parkinson’s disease, as well as other neurological damage linked to the herbicide. Data appears to indicate long-term exposure, such as with agricultural workers who spray, mix or handle the weedkiller, increases the risk of chronic and progressive neurological damage.

That same evidence has led to nearly 6,700 Paraquat lawsuits being filed against Syngenta and Chevron, the manufacturers, arguing that the companies knew about the herbicideโ€™s links to Parkinsonโ€™s disease, but failed to warn consumers, fearing a loss in sales of the weedkiller, which was already known to be toxic and required special training and licensing.

The manufacturers are currently trying to finalize a Paraquat settlement that may resolve the litigation for an undisclosed amount.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

Paraquat Ban Proposal

Luna and Pingree issued a press release on June 18 announcing the legislation, indicating that the bill is modeled after a Paraquat ban recently enacted in Vermont. They called the bill an effort to make Vermontโ€™s policy national.

In addition to cancelling and prohibiting the registration of any Paraquat-based products, the Act would also ban the sale and use of existing Paraquat inventories and includes provisions that would revoke any current tolerances for Paraquat residue in food, setting the acceptable level to zero.

In the press release, Pingree notes that Paraquat bans are already in place in more than 70 countries and criticized the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for its review of the herbicide, which has been ongoing since 2022.

โ€œOur bill cancels paraquatโ€™s registration outright. No more reviews, no more waiting, no more excuses.โ€

– U.S. Rep. Chellie Pingree (D-Maine)

The American Parkinson Disease Association (APDA) also issued a press release in support of the legislation, calling the bill a necessary step toward the protection of agricultural workers and rural communities as a whole. The group called for its members and others to urge representatives to support the bill.

The call for the federal Paraquat ban comes only a couple months after Syngenta announced plans to phaseout Paraquat production worldwide, and after several states revealed plans to follow in Vermontโ€™s footsteps.

To stay up to date on this litigation, sign up for more Paraquat lawsuit updates to be sent directly to your inbox.

Irvin Jackson
Written By: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES