FDA Refuses To Set Limits for PFAS Toxic Chemicals in Bottled Water: Consumer Reports

Despite mounting concerns about cancer risks associated with water contaminated with per- and polyfluoralkyl substances (PFAS), federal regulators under the Trump administration have refused to established limits on the toxic chemicals in bottled water products.

Consumer Reports issued a report this week highlighting an FDA decision not to set limits PFAS toxic chemicals in bottled water at this time, claiming the agency is relying on outdated research.

The report follows a review of FDA documents by Consumer Reports, after a number of consumer advocacy groups and the International Bottled Water Association (IBWA) requested last year that the agency set limits on the compounds, which have been linked to cancer and learning delays in children. Consumer Reports gained access to a letter (PDF) from December 2019, which indicated the FDA thought such limits were unnecessary.

Firefighting Foam Lawsuits

Were you or a loved one exposed to toxic AFFF Chemicals?

Lawyers are reviewing aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) lawsuits for firefighters, military personnel and individuals who developed cancer or other health issues from exposure to toxic firefighting foam chemicals.

Learn More About this Lawsuit SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION

The letter was sent to IBWA, which called for the agency to establish a standard of quality (SOQ) which would limit any single PFAS compound to 5 parts per trillion (ppt), and 10 ppt for all total PFAS in finished bottled water products.

“While we do not object to IBWA’s adoption of SOQs for its members, FDA believes it would be premature for the Agency to establish a SOQ for PFAS in bottled water at this time, given the ongoing activities at EP addressing PFAS in public drinking water,” the FDA letter states. “In addition, FDA’s testing show that bottled water generally has no detectable levels of PFAS.”

PFAS chemicals are used in a wide variety of products, yet the chemicals are projected to take thousands of years to degrade, and past studies have shown their ability to enter and stay in the environment and human body through the air, dust, food, soil, and water. The chemicals primarily settle into the blood, kidney and liver, and have been found to contaminate waters sources near military bases, airports and other locations where the anti-fire foam is regularly used.

Some estimates suggest the chemicals may be detected in the blood of 98% of the U.S. population, and exposure has been linked to a wide variety of cancers, including kidney cancer, testicular cancer and breast cancer.

In September, Consumer Reports published an analysis of 47 bottled water products, including 35 noncarbonated and 12 carbonated products. They found detectable levels of PFAS in 43 of the 47 products tested.

Consumer Reports indicates the agency’s claim there were no PFAS detected in bottled water was faulty, and based on an analysis conducted in 2016 which only looked at 30 products, and which could not detect PFAS levels below 4 ppt.

Some of the products tested by Consumer Reports were found to contain levels of nearly 10 ppt.

Consumer Reports and the IBWA plan to continue pressuring the agency to adopt new, more stringent standards, according to the report.

Firefighting Foam Chemicals Pose Safety Concerns

Consumer Reports and other investigators have repeatedly pointed to the use of Aqueous Film-Forming Foams (AFFFs) as a major cause of PFAS water contamination nationwide, as the fire foam used in prior decades contained a number of PFAS chemicals that could leach into waters supplies around military bases and other training facilities.

In recent months, former firefighters and families living near bases have filed numerous firefighting foam lawsuits, which have been filed over testicular cancer, kidney cancer, pancreatic cancer and other injuries.

Since December 2018, all complaints involving firefighting foam exposure filed in federal courts nationwide have been centralized in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina for pretrial proceedings.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

BioZorb Lawsuit Alleges Breast Tissue Marker Failed, Requiring Surgical Removal
BioZorb Lawsuit Alleges Breast Tissue Marker Failed, Requiring Surgical Removal (Posted 2 days ago)

A BioZorb lawsuit has been filed by several breast cancer survivors after the BioZorb implants moved out of place and failed to dissolve int he body, requiring surgical removal.

Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October
Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October (Posted 2 days ago)

A U.S. District Court judge has scheduled a fairness hearing for October in order to determine whether final approval should be granted to a $25 million Philips CPAP recall settlement agreement, which would pay former users $25 million to pay for future medical monitoring needs.