Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Philips CPAP Foam Removal Attempted By Some Owners of Sleep Apnea Machines, Despite FDA Warnings Attempting to remove sound abatement foam from recalled Philips sleep apnea machines may pose serious health risks October 22, 2021 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments Despite warnings from federal regulators, some consumers are apparently trying to remove Philips CPAP sound abatement foam from recalled DreamStation sleep apnea machines, potentially causing serious safety risks and destroying important evidence that may be needed if they pursue a lawsuit over injuries caused by the toxic foam. A massive Philips Respironics sleep apnea machine recall was issued in June 2021, after the manufacturer acknowledged that the sound abatement foam may deteriorate and break down, releasing black particles and toxic chemicals directly into the machine’s air pathways, tubing and face mask. As a result of the potential long-term side effects of breathing the Philips CPAP foam, federal health officials recommended that owners of all DreamStation devices immediately stop using their sleep apnea machine, unless it was necessary for life-sustaining therapy. However, replacement CPAP machines have been in low supply and it is expected that Philips CPAP recall repairs will take over a year to complete, leaving many individuals without access to a machine they rely on for treatment of their sleep apnea. Stay Up-to-Date About Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Philips CPAP recall lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More Stay Up-to-Date About Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Philips CPAP recall lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More Over the past few weeks, a number of instructional videos have shown up on Youtube, providing detailed instructions for removing the polyester-based polyurethane (PE-PUR) foam from the DreamStation sleep apnea machine, suggesting that it will then allow owners to use the device again. While several of the videos include vague warnings that suggest viewers should not actually attempt to remove the CPAP sound abatement foam themselves, the videos then go on to demonstrate exactly how to do so. In a series of answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) published by the FDA on September 10, the agency clearly warned against Philips CPAP foam removal by owners of the sleep apnea machine, suggesting that it may pose serious health risks. “The FDA recommends you do not attempt to remove the sound abatement foam, as it may impact device performance and possibly introduce additional foam debris into the device air pathways,” according to the statement. “Philips Respironics is directly responsible for repair and replacement of all recall affected devices.” Since the recall, lab analysis has identified a number of harmful and potentially cancer-causing chemicals in the CPAP sound abatement foam, including toluene diamine, toluene diisocyanate and diethylene glycol. In addition, several Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) have been identified from “off-gasing” as the foam breaks down. Dozens of owners are now pursuing Philips CPAP recall lawsuits against the manufacturer, claiming that long-term exposure to the foam while using the sleep apnea machine caused various types of cancer and other respiratory side effects, including pulmonary fibrosis, pneumonia, asthma, bronchitis and other injuries. For individuals who attempt removal of the CPAP sound abatement foam or otherwise alter the state of their machine, lawyers warn that they are likely to face challenges in any lawsuit later brought against Philips, under the defense of “spoliation of evidence”, since plaintiffs will have the burden of proof to establish that the foam in their CPAP machine degraded and caused any long-term injury suffered. Product liability lawyers recommend all Philips DreamStation machines be preserved and that no material changes are made to the sleep apnea device, as injuries caused by prior exposure to deteriorating foam may take some time to emerge. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Cancer, Class Action Lawsuit, CPAP, Medical Device Recall, Particulate Matter, Philips, Respiratory, Sleep Apnea More Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit Stories Lawsuits Between Philips and SoClean Over CPAP Machine Problems To Be Trial Ready by July 2025 September 3, 2024 Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October July 11, 2024 Philips OmniLab Advanced+ Ventilator Recall Issued Over Loss of Therapy Risks July 1, 2024 1 Comments Jeffry January 6, 2022 Oh baloney! You can now preserve the foam in the casing intact by replacing the entire internal casing with a foamless one. Your solution is to keep breathing through it as is? X/TwitterThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Brookstone Fire Pit Lawsuit Filed After Woman Suffers Second, Third Degree Burns (Posted: yesterday) A Michigan couple has filed a Brookstone fire pit lawsuit, indicating the wife suffered severe burn injuries due to the product’s design and refueling instructions. MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Flame Jetting From Tabletop Fire Pit Sold on Amazon Caused Severe Burn Injuries (01/08/2026)Amazon Fire Pit Lawsuit Set For Trial in February 2027 (12/22/2025)Family Dollar, Amazon Face Lawsuit Over Tabletop Fire Pit Burn Injuries (12/03/2025) The ‘Can’t Feel My Feet’ Symptom Doctors See in Nitrous Oxide Nerve Injury (Posted: 4 days ago) Nitrous oxide injury lawsuits are emerging as medical evidence links recreational use of the gas to nerve damage that can cause numbness, balance problems and difficulty walking, often without adequate side effect warnings. MORE ABOUT: NITROUS OXIDE LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Nitrous Oxide Use Led to Child’s Death at Dentist (01/05/2026)Judge Transfers Galaxy Gas Lawsuits Over Nitrous Oxide Canister Sales to Same Court (12/29/2025)Lawyers in Galaxy Gas Injury Lawsuit Will Meet With Judge on Jan. 9, 2026 (12/12/2025) Bard PowerPort Infection Lawsuit Set for Trial To Begin April 21, 2026 (Posted: 5 days ago) A federal judge has scheduled a series of Bard PowerPort trials between April 2026 and February 2027, which will focus on allegations that defective design flaws made the devices susceptible to infections, fractures and migration. MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITCook Flexor Sheath Lawsuit Claims Defective Catheter Device Led to Woman’s Death (01/06/2026)More Than 2,500 Bard Powerport Lawsuits Filed in Federal Courts Nationwide (12/05/2025)Six Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Will Go Before Juries Between May 2026 and Feb. 2027 (11/26/2025)
Lawsuits Between Philips and SoClean Over CPAP Machine Problems To Be Trial Ready by July 2025 September 3, 2024
Brookstone Fire Pit Lawsuit Filed After Woman Suffers Second, Third Degree Burns (Posted: yesterday) A Michigan couple has filed a Brookstone fire pit lawsuit, indicating the wife suffered severe burn injuries due to the product’s design and refueling instructions. MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Flame Jetting From Tabletop Fire Pit Sold on Amazon Caused Severe Burn Injuries (01/08/2026)Amazon Fire Pit Lawsuit Set For Trial in February 2027 (12/22/2025)Family Dollar, Amazon Face Lawsuit Over Tabletop Fire Pit Burn Injuries (12/03/2025)
The ‘Can’t Feel My Feet’ Symptom Doctors See in Nitrous Oxide Nerve Injury (Posted: 4 days ago) Nitrous oxide injury lawsuits are emerging as medical evidence links recreational use of the gas to nerve damage that can cause numbness, balance problems and difficulty walking, often without adequate side effect warnings. MORE ABOUT: NITROUS OXIDE LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Nitrous Oxide Use Led to Child’s Death at Dentist (01/05/2026)Judge Transfers Galaxy Gas Lawsuits Over Nitrous Oxide Canister Sales to Same Court (12/29/2025)Lawyers in Galaxy Gas Injury Lawsuit Will Meet With Judge on Jan. 9, 2026 (12/12/2025)
Bard PowerPort Infection Lawsuit Set for Trial To Begin April 21, 2026 (Posted: 5 days ago) A federal judge has scheduled a series of Bard PowerPort trials between April 2026 and February 2027, which will focus on allegations that defective design flaws made the devices susceptible to infections, fractures and migration. MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITCook Flexor Sheath Lawsuit Claims Defective Catheter Device Led to Woman’s Death (01/06/2026)More Than 2,500 Bard Powerport Lawsuits Filed in Federal Courts Nationwide (12/05/2025)Six Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Will Go Before Juries Between May 2026 and Feb. 2027 (11/26/2025)