Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Roblox Lawsuit Families are filing Roblox lawsuits after children were targeted by predators for grooming, sextortion, sexual abuse, or exploitation on the platform. Learn who qualifies, what cases allege, and how to file a confidential claim.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Individuals who suffered severe burns, or families who lost a loved one in a tabletop fire pit explosion, may be eligible for financial compensation through a fire pit injury lawsuit.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Philips CPAP Foam Removal Attempted By Some Owners of Sleep Apnea Machines, Despite FDA Warnings Attempting to remove sound abatement foam from recalled Philips sleep apnea machines may pose serious health risks October 22, 2021 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments Despite warnings from federal regulators, some consumers are apparently trying to remove Philips CPAP sound abatement foam from recalled DreamStation sleep apnea machines, potentially causing serious safety risks and destroying important evidence that may be needed if they pursue a lawsuit over injuries caused by the toxic foam. A massive Philips Respironics sleep apnea machine recall was issued in June 2021, after the manufacturer acknowledged that the sound abatement foam may deteriorate and break down, releasing black particles and toxic chemicals directly into the machine’s air pathways, tubing and face mask. As a result of the potential long-term side effects of breathing the Philips CPAP foam, federal health officials recommended that owners of all DreamStation devices immediately stop using their sleep apnea machine, unless it was necessary for life-sustaining therapy. However, replacement CPAP machines have been in low supply and it is expected that Philips CPAP recall repairs will take over a year to complete, leaving many individuals without access to a machine they rely on for treatment of their sleep apnea. Stay Up-to-Date About Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Philips CPAP recall lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More Stay Up-to-Date About Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Philips CPAP recall lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More Over the past few weeks, a number of instructional videos have shown up on Youtube, providing detailed instructions for removing the polyester-based polyurethane (PE-PUR) foam from the DreamStation sleep apnea machine, suggesting that it will then allow owners to use the device again. While several of the videos include vague warnings that suggest viewers should not actually attempt to remove the CPAP sound abatement foam themselves, the videos then go on to demonstrate exactly how to do so. In a series of answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) published by the FDA on September 10, the agency clearly warned against Philips CPAP foam removal by owners of the sleep apnea machine, suggesting that it may pose serious health risks. “The FDA recommends you do not attempt to remove the sound abatement foam, as it may impact device performance and possibly introduce additional foam debris into the device air pathways,” according to the statement. “Philips Respironics is directly responsible for repair and replacement of all recall affected devices.” Since the recall, lab analysis has identified a number of harmful and potentially cancer-causing chemicals in the CPAP sound abatement foam, including toluene diamine, toluene diisocyanate and diethylene glycol. In addition, several Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) have been identified from “off-gasing” as the foam breaks down. Dozens of owners are now pursuing Philips CPAP recall lawsuits against the manufacturer, claiming that long-term exposure to the foam while using the sleep apnea machine caused various types of cancer and other respiratory side effects, including pulmonary fibrosis, pneumonia, asthma, bronchitis and other injuries. For individuals who attempt removal of the CPAP sound abatement foam or otherwise alter the state of their machine, lawyers warn that they are likely to face challenges in any lawsuit later brought against Philips, under the defense of “spoliation of evidence”, since plaintiffs will have the burden of proof to establish that the foam in their CPAP machine degraded and caused any long-term injury suffered. Product liability lawyers recommend all Philips DreamStation machines be preserved and that no material changes are made to the sleep apnea device, as injuries caused by prior exposure to deteriorating foam may take some time to emerge. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Cancer, Class Action Lawsuit, CPAP, Medical Device Recall, Particulate Matter, Philips, Respiratory, Sleep Apnea More Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit Stories Lawsuits Between Philips and SoClean Over CPAP Machine Problems To Be Trial Ready by July 2025 September 3, 2024 Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October July 11, 2024 Philips OmniLab Advanced+ Ventilator Recall Issued Over Loss of Therapy Risks July 1, 2024 1 Comments Jeffry January 6, 2022 Oh baloney! You can now preserve the foam in the casing intact by replacing the entire internal casing with a foamless one. Your solution is to keep breathing through it as is? CompanyThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Judge To Hear Depo-Provera Lawsuit Preemption Arguments on Monday (Posted: yesterday) A federal judge will hear oral arguments on Monday over whether Depo-Provera lawsuit failure to warn claims are preempted by federal law. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITLink Between Depo-Provera and Meningioma Brain Tumors Ignored by Pfizer, Plaintiffs Indicate (09/22/2025)Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms Create Lifelong Meningioma Fears Among Women (09/17/2025)Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Significantly Increased Among Women Over 31: Study (09/03/2025) Lyft Sexual Assault Lawsuit Alleges Problems With Predatory Drivers Were Known for Years (Posted: 2 days ago) Rideshare company Lfyt faces a sexual assault lawsuit from a Georgia woman who says a driver exposed himself after she ordered a ride home from a babysitting job. MORE ABOUT: UBER SEXUAL ASSAULT LAWSUITTwo Uber Sexual Assault Bellwether Trials To Be Held in North Carolina (09/22/2025)Uber Passenger Sexual Assault Trial Underway in California State Court (09/10/2025)Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit Set To Go Before Jury in Jan. 2026 (09/04/2025) Exploding Isopropyl Bottles Make Smokeless Fire Pits Inherently Dangerous, Lawsuits Claim (Posted: 3 days ago) Lawsuits allege tabletop fire pits are inherently dangerous because they encourage consumers to fuel them with ordinary isopropyl bottles, which can explode in seconds and cause devastating burn injuries. MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITTabletop Fire Pit Recall Announced by Five Below Amid Growing Number of Burn Injury Lawsuits (09/18/2025)Lawsuit Alleges Portable Fire Pit Sold on Amazon.com Caused Flashback Burn Injuries (09/12/2025)Wayfair Fire Pit Lawsuit Links Flame Jetting Explosion to Defective Design (09/05/2025)
Lawsuits Between Philips and SoClean Over CPAP Machine Problems To Be Trial Ready by July 2025 September 3, 2024
Judge To Hear Depo-Provera Lawsuit Preemption Arguments on Monday (Posted: yesterday) A federal judge will hear oral arguments on Monday over whether Depo-Provera lawsuit failure to warn claims are preempted by federal law. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITLink Between Depo-Provera and Meningioma Brain Tumors Ignored by Pfizer, Plaintiffs Indicate (09/22/2025)Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms Create Lifelong Meningioma Fears Among Women (09/17/2025)Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Significantly Increased Among Women Over 31: Study (09/03/2025)
Lyft Sexual Assault Lawsuit Alleges Problems With Predatory Drivers Were Known for Years (Posted: 2 days ago) Rideshare company Lfyt faces a sexual assault lawsuit from a Georgia woman who says a driver exposed himself after she ordered a ride home from a babysitting job. MORE ABOUT: UBER SEXUAL ASSAULT LAWSUITTwo Uber Sexual Assault Bellwether Trials To Be Held in North Carolina (09/22/2025)Uber Passenger Sexual Assault Trial Underway in California State Court (09/10/2025)Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit Set To Go Before Jury in Jan. 2026 (09/04/2025)
Exploding Isopropyl Bottles Make Smokeless Fire Pits Inherently Dangerous, Lawsuits Claim (Posted: 3 days ago) Lawsuits allege tabletop fire pits are inherently dangerous because they encourage consumers to fuel them with ordinary isopropyl bottles, which can explode in seconds and cause devastating burn injuries. MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITTabletop Fire Pit Recall Announced by Five Below Amid Growing Number of Burn Injury Lawsuits (09/18/2025)Lawsuit Alleges Portable Fire Pit Sold on Amazon.com Caused Flashback Burn Injuries (09/12/2025)Wayfair Fire Pit Lawsuit Links Flame Jetting Explosion to Defective Design (09/05/2025)