Repaired Philips CPAP Sleep Apnea Machines Have Been Returned to Customers with Potentially Unsafe Silicone Foam

FDA has ordered Philips to conduct independent testing of the silicone CPAP foam used to repair recalled sleep apnea machines

Federal regulators issued updated information this week for consumers impacted by a massive Philips CPAP recall last year, indicating that some repaired sleep apnea machines have already been returned to consumers with a new type of silicone foam, even though the agency still does not have sufficient information to determine whether the fixed CPAP machines pose a risk to patients.

More than 15 million Philips DreamStation, CPAP, BiPAP and mechanical ventilators were recalled in June 2021, since they contained a defective polyester-based polyurethane (PE-PUR) sound abatement foam, which has been found to degrade and breakdown, releasing toxic chemicals and debris directly into the machine air pathways.

These problems have already been linked to reports of long-term side effects for Philips CPAP users, including respiratory injuries, lung damage and cancer.

Stay Up-to-Date About

Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuits

AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Philips CPAP recall lawsuit updates or developments.

"*" indicates required fields

On January 26, the FDA announced a new Philips Trilogy EVO ventilator recall, indicating that the same PE-PUR foam was used in several hundred additional devices and repair kits, which were not included in the original recall.

The agency also updated answers to frequently asked questions about the recall on Wednesday, highlighting serious on-going concerns about the safety of repaired Philips CPAP machines, where the manufacturer replaced the PE-PUR foam with a different silicone-based sound abatement foam.

During a recent inspection of the Philips manufacturing facility, the FDA discovered information that similar silicone foam used in a device marketed outside the U.S. failed a safety test for the release of certain “chemicals of concern”, which may also enter the machine’s air pathways, potentially causing similar health risks to the PE-PUR foam.

“The FDA is aware that patients have already received devices with silicone-based foam as part of the repair and replace program,” the updated FAQ notes. “At this time, the agency does not have sufficient information to conclude whether the silicone-based foam being used in the repaired devices poses any risk to patients in the U.S.”

Philips has been required to retain an independent laboratory to perform additional testing to determine what safety risks the repaired CPAP machines with silicone foam may pose for consumers. However, the FDA is not yet recommending that patients who received a repaired device should stop using their sleep apnea machine.

“The results from the independent testing are needed to determine if the silicone-based foam used in the repaired devices does in fact present any risks to patients, and the FDA will communicate those results to the public as soon as they are available,” the FDA notes. “Patients who have additional concerns should talk to their health care provider about the plan for their care and treatment.”

PHILIPS CPAP REPAIR LAWSUITS

Have you received a repaired Philips CPAP machine and experienced side effects?

CONTACT A LAWYER

There are currently thousands of individuals pursuing Philips CPAP lawsuits against the makers of the sleep apnea machines, already alleging they were exposed to an increased of cancer, severe respiratory problems and other health complications after breathing chemicals and gases released as the foam breaks down.

Given common questions of fact and law raised in product liability and class action lawsuits over recalled sleep apnea machines filed throughout the federal court system, the litigation has been centralized before Senior U.S. District Judge Joy Flowers Conti in the Western District of Pennsylvania for coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings, as part of a multidistrict litigation (MDL).

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Johnson & Johnson Faces Medical Monitoring Lawsuit Over Future Baby Powder Cancer Risks
Johnson & Johnson Faces Medical Monitoring Lawsuit Over Future Baby Powder Cancer Risks (Posted yesterday)

Women who used Johnson's Baby Powder around their genitals for feminine hygiene purposes now live in fear of developing ovarian cancer, according to the class action lawsuit seeking medical monitoring for future diagnoses

More Than 9,600 Join Suboxone Lawsuit Over Tooth Decay in MDL Filing
More Than 9,600 Join Suboxone Lawsuit Over Tooth Decay in MDL Filing (Posted 2 days ago)

A bundled complaint of about 9,600 Suboxone lawsuits were filed in federal court on Friday, ahead of the two-year anniversary of the FDA requiring tooth decay label warnings on the opioid treatment film strips, which is also a deadline for filing a civil complaint in many states.