Polaris Virage Jet Ski Accident Results in $21.7M Jury Award

A California woman has been awarded $21.7 million in damages in a jet ski lawsuit brought after a Polaris Virage collided with another watercraft, leaving her with permanent brain damage.  

The complaint was filed by Fabiola Esparza against Polaris Industries Inc. and two other individuals, alleging that problems with the design of the jet ski contributed to her injuries.

Esparza, then 15, and another girl were riding as passengers on a Polaris Virage jet ski operated by Andrew Guiterrez, who was also a teenager at the time, when it collided with a larger boat on Independence Day in 2008. The jet ski crashed into a boat being piloted by Douglas Lane, who local police reported was intoxicated at the time of the accident. Police also determined that both watercraft were travelling at excessive speeds

Did You Know?

Change Healthcare Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Change Healthcare data breach exposed the names, social security numbers, medical and personal information of potentially 100 million Americans, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

According to allegations raised in the lawsuit, Guiterrez was unable to avoid the boat because he had let go of the hand-controlled throttle. However, Esparza claimed that as a result of design defects with the Polaris Virage, Guiterrez was unable to steer the jet ski with the throttle in that position.

While a Los Angeles jury found late last month that the drivers of the larger boat and the jet ski were at fault in the accident, it also determined that the design of the Polaris Virage jet ski was largely responsible for Esparza’s severe injuries, which have left the now-20 year old with the mental capacity of a small child and the need for a future lifetime of medical care.

Documents revealed during the trial suggested that Polaris knew about the problem with the Virage jet ski, which allegedly could have been fixed for just an additional $30 per watercraft. That information came from a December 2003 document from the company’s managing engineer, Dave Dickirson.

The jury ruled that the Polaris Virage was defective, but did not find Polaris negligent for failing to correct the problem by adding an off-throttle steering system.

Polaris is responsible for about $11.5 million of the jury award, according to a report by Law360.com. The rest will be split between Lane and Guiterrez. The company stopped production of watercraft in 2004.

1 Comments

  • DAVIDMarch 22, 2019 at 2:10 am

    None of the older or even newer watercraft can steer when you are not on the throttle. This could have happened on any brand of ski.. what would the fix be put a fin on the jet?

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Plaintiffs Tell Court Manufacturers Have Not Turned Over Complete Details on Toxic Products
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Plaintiffs Tell Court Manufacturers Have Not Turned Over Complete Details on Toxic Products (Posted today)

Status report on hair relaxer lawsuits reveals that plaintiffs are still awaiting key information about the ingredients contained in specific hair straighteners sold by cosmetics manufacturers, as part of the discovery process leading up to early bellwether trials.

Suboxone Film Lawsuit Highlights How Dental Decay Problems Continue To Be Reported Even After Label Change
Suboxone Film Lawsuit Highlights How Dental Decay Problems Continue To Be Reported Even After Label Change (Posted yesterday)

Updated warnings issued in June 2022 failed to adequately convey Suboxone’s risks of tooth decay, which has resulted in continuing reports of dental problems among users of the film strips, lawsuit indicates.