Post Cereal Class Action Settlement Results in $15M Payment Over Claims “Natural” Labels Were Misleading

A federal judge has approved a class action settlement that will result in a payment of $15 million by Post Foods, as well as an agreement to change false and misleading nutritional labels provided on several of its popular cereal products.

The Post cereal settlement agreement was tentatively approved by a California Judge last week, resolving claims that the manufacturer of Raisin Bran and Honey Bunches made false and misleading claims that the products were “wholesome”, “smart” and “nutritious”, despite high levels of sugar additives.

The class action lawsuit was filed against Post Foods in 2016, by Debbie Krommenhock and Stephen Hadley, raising allegations that the company deceptively markets and sells multiple high-sugar cereal products as healthy and without high fructose corn syrup, intentionally misleading consumers to increase profits when in fact they contain higher amounts of sugar than displayed on the nutritional labels..

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

Plaintiffs argued that certain cereal products included under the complaint contained up to 16g of sugar per 59g servings, which represents 27% of the energy coming from sugar. The products listed in the lawsuit included Raisin Bran, Bran Flakes, Great Grains (and its predecessor, Selects), Honey Bunches of Oats Cereal and Granola, Shredded Wheat Honey Nut and Crunch!, Alpha-Bits, Golden Crisp, Honeycomb, and Waffle Crisp.

Krommenhock and Hadley claimed these levels of sugar additives hardly fall under a consumerโ€™s perception of healthy and wholesome, and accused Post of using a policy and practice of marketing high-sugar cereals with health and wellness claims.

While the FDA has yet to establish official definitions for terms like “healthy”, “wholesome” and “nutritious”, or regulate the amount of sugar products these labels can contain, plaintiffโ€™s argued consumers are left to overwhelmingly rely on health claims made by the manufacturers when making healthy choice selections.

Following more than four years of litigation, and just a few months before trial was scheduled to start, Judge William H. Orrick gave preliminary approval to an agreement reached by the parties to settle the case, which will result in Post Foods Inc. establishing a $15 million class settlement fund.

Class members included in the settlement include consumers who bought certain cereal varieties between August 29, 2012, and November 2, 2020. The estimated average cash award is expected to be $14.25 per consumer.

In addition to the monetary fund, Post Foods LLC agrees to refrain from using certain labeling claims including โ€œLess Processed,โ€ โ€œNatural,โ€ โ€œHealthy,โ€ โ€œNutritious,โ€ and โ€œWholesome” if the products contain more than 10% of the cerealโ€™s calories come from added sugar.

The food industry says it wants the FDA to create an official definition for label claims including the word โ€œhealthyโ€, especially as sugar labeling lawsuits have been on the rise in recent years.

In 2019, Kellogg reached a $20 million settlement agreement after multiple lawsuits were filed against the manufacturer over the companyโ€™s use of the phrase โ€œlightly sweetenedโ€ on its Frosted Mini-Wheats and Smart Start cereals. Kellogg similarly agreed under the settlement to refrain from using the words โ€œhealthyโ€, โ€œwholesomeโ€, โ€œnutritiousโ€, or โ€œbenefitsโ€, and to remove the phrases โ€œHeart Healthโ€ and โ€œLightly Sweetenedโ€ from the boxes of Smart Start, Raisin Bran and Frosted Mini-Wheats cereals.

Irvin Jackson
Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




8 Comments


Dixie
I have been eating them thinking they were healthier. So much for advertising!!

Pamela
I need to know can you used a picture of the box and take a picture of the date and send it in for the law suit if u canโ€™t find the receipt but still have the box

Kathryn
I definitely can’t be serious because I really believe that was healthy I eat Honey Nut Cheerios in the morning

Tameika
I use to eat this to lose weight. Just to get board line diabetes.

Natalie
Purchased this cereal for years now. Always believed it was healthier than many others especially the raisin bran

Joseph
Now that I know the raisin bran wasn’t as healthy as I originally thought, I don’t think I’ll continue eating it. I like to go to the gym and I love raisin bran, but if it’s not that healthy it’s a no go

Cynthia
I have always had faith the eating Post cereal was a healthy choice in my daily choice.

Natalie
Definitely ate this cereal thinking it was better than other brands/types of cereal.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

According to a recently filed lawsuit, exposure to Suboxone oral film strips caused an Illinois man to suffer severe tooth decay that required extensive dental work.
The number of Depo-Provera lawsuits continues to climb, with more than 6,000 claims now filed nationwide by women who allege they developed brain tumors after receiving the birth control injections.