Powdered Medical Glove Ban Considered By FDA Due To Allergy Risks

Due to risks associated with powdered medical gloves, federal regulators have proposed a nationwide ban on their use. 

The FDA published a federal register notice on Tuesday, outlining a new rule that would ban powdered gloves used in the medical profession.

According to the agency, the powder used on the gloves may cause enough latex exposure for medical professionals and patients to develop allergies that they may not have otherwise had.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

The proposed rule would make it illegal to market powdered surgeon’s gloves, powdered patient examination gloves, and absorbable powder for lubricating surgeon’s gloves. The rule does not affect powdered radiographic gloves, none of which are currently on the market.

The FDA notes that the use of powdered medical gloves are already on the decline. However, the agency has determined that they pose an “unreasonable and substantial risk of illness or injury” to health care professionals, patients and anyone exposed to them. The FDA said the problem cannot be corrected with new or updated labels.

“This ban is about protecting patients and health care professionals from a danger they might not even be aware of,” Dr. Jeffrey Shuren, director of the FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health, said in a press release. “We take bans very seriously and only take this action when we feel it’s necessary to protect the public health.”

The powder is used to make it easier to put on and remove the gloves. They come in either natural or synthetic versions.

According to the FDA, the natural aerosolized glove powder can carry proteins that cause respiratory allergic reactions. The synthetic powders, while they do not cause allergic reactions, can cause a number of potentially serious adverse events, including:

  • Severe airway inflammation
  • Wound inflammation
  • Post-surgical adhesions

The proposed rule came as the result of a review of scientific literature and comments that followed a 2011 federal register notice. The FDA also noted that the removal of the gloves from the market would not cause a shortage, since there are non-powdered protective gloves available.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A Florida jury has ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay $20 million to the family of a man who died of mesothelioma after using the company’s talc-based products for 50 years.
Sanofi indicates Dupixent sales are growing stronger as the medication gathers more indications for use worldwide, despite recent cancer concerns.
Researchers warn that sports-betting apps use reward-based design and constant engagement tactics that can fuel addiction among young adults—sparking a surge of lawsuits accusing major platforms of exploiting these vulnerabilities for profit.