Exchange of Information About Nexium, Prilosec Kidney Injury Claims To Be Discussed During Status Conference Today

Lawyers involved in the federal Nexium lawsuits, Prilosec lawsuits, Prevacid lawsuits, and other claims involving kidney damage from similar heart burn drugs, are set to meet today with the U.S. District Judge presiding over the litigation, to discuss what should be included on “Fact Sheets” that each plaintiff will be required to complete, providing detailed information about their injury and claim.

There are currently about 500 cases pending in the federal court system, each involving similar allegations that the makers of popular proton pump inhibitor medications failed to adequately warn consumers and the medical community about the serious kidney risks associated with the drugs, which are regularly used by millions of Americans to treat symptoms of heartburn, acid reflux, ulcers and other gastrointestinal problems.

The litigation has rapidly emerged following the publication of several studies over the past two years, and it is ultimately expected to include thousands of lawsuits brought by individuals nationwide.

Did You Know?

Ticketmaster Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Ticketmaster data breach exposed the names, addresses, phone numbers, credit card numbers and other personal information of more than 560 million customers, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

Given similar questions of fact and law raised in complaints filed in U.S. District Courts nationwide, the federal litigation has been centralized before U.S. District Judge Claire C. Cecchi in the District of New Jersey, as part of an MDL, or Multidistrict Litigation. The cases are consolidated to reduce duplicative discovery, avoid conflicting pretrial rulings and to serve the convenience of the parties, witnesses and the judicial system.

According to a status report (PDF) posted this week in advance of a conference scheduled for this afternoon, the parties are expected to discuss with Judge Cecchi the entry of an order requiring Plaintiff Fact Sheets in each case, as well as the entry of a direct filing order, scheduling of a “Science Day” and other matters.

In complex pharmaceutical litigation, where large numbers of claims have been brought against the makers of the same or similar drugs, requiring a Plaintiff Fact Sheet (PFS) in each case is often the first step in the discovery process, requiring each plaintiff to provide details about their injury and claim.

According to a joint letter (PDF) filed on behalf of all parties on January 9, lawyers advised Judge Cecchi that they have made substantial progress on the form of a PFS and are close to reaching an agreement regarding a proposed order. If they fail to reach an agreement, the parties indicate that they will raise those issues and seek the Court’s guidance at today’s conference.

In addition, separate letters were submitted on behalf of plaintiffs (PDF) and defendants (PDF), outlining unresolved discovery disputes regarding requests for production of documents and information from the drug makers, and other matters.

According to the status report, there are currently 469 lawsuits pending in the federal MDL, which involve 503 plaintiffs. In addition. there are about another 227 related lawsuits pending in state courts, with 127 pending in the Delaware Superior Court. However, as heartburn drug injury lawyers continue to review and file cases, the size and scope of the litigation is expected to continue to increase rapidly in the coming months and years.

Following today’s status conference, it is expected that Judge Cecchi will issue case management orders that will kick off the first phase of discovery in the litigation.

As part of the coordinated pretrial proceedings in the MDL, it is also expected that Judge Cecchi will later establish a bellwhether program, where a small group of cases will be prepared for early trial dates to help the parties gauge how juries may respond to certain evidence and testimony that will be repeated throughout the claims. However, if settlements or another resolution for the litigation is not reached in the MDL, each individual case may be remanded back to U.S. District Courts nationwide for separate trial dates.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Ozempic MDL Court To Evaluate Need for Gastroparesis Diagnostic Testing in GLP-1 Lawsuits
Ozempic MDL Court To Evaluate Need for Gastroparesis Diagnostic Testing in GLP-1 Lawsuits (Posted 2 days ago)

A federal judge has agreed to divide lawsuits over gastroparesis injuries linked to drugs like Ozempic and Mounjaro into multiple phases, examining how the condition is diagnosed and whether plaintiffs' claims are preempted by federal laws.

Adult Woman Files Similac Lawsuit Over NEC Injuries Experienced as a Newborn
Adult Woman Files Similac Lawsuit Over NEC Injuries Experienced as a Newborn (Posted 3 days ago)

Lawsuit alleges that Abbott Laboratories failed to provide families and the medical community with adequate warnings about the risks associated with it’s cow’s milk-based Similac formula, which a now adult woman indicates has left her with life-long NEC injuries.

Amended Lawsuit Over BioZorb Implant Side Effects Outlines Problems Caused By Tissue Marker Design Defects
Amended Lawsuit Over BioZorb Implant Side Effects Outlines Problems Caused By Tissue Marker Design Defects (Posted 4 days ago)

Six breast cancer patients have asked a federal judge for permission to amend a complaint filed in March 2024, which describes problems linked to the device and painful side effects experienced when the tissue marker migrated out of position or shattered inside their bodies.