Processed Food Type 2 Diabetes Lawsuit Alleges Companies Targeted Children With Toxic, Addictive Ingredients

Lawsuit cites research estimating that a “striking and unprecedented” 12% to 15% of children may now meet criteria for ultra-processed food addiction.

A Mississippi mother has filed a product liability lawsuit against many of the nation’s largest food manufacturers, alleging they deliberately engineered and marketed ultra-processed foods towards children, which caused her son to develop Type 2 diabetes at only 9 years old.

The complaint (PDF) was brought by Tamika Lawton in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi on February 12, on behalf of her minor son, who is identified with the initials “J.L.” to protect the minor’s privacy.

The ultra-processed food lawsuit seeks damages from The Kraft Heinz Company, Mondelez International Inc., Post Holdings Inc., The Coca-Cola Company, PepsiCo Inc., General Mills Inc., Nestle USA Inc., Kellanova, WK Kellogg Co., Mars Incorporated Inc. and Conagra Brands Inc., which are named as defendants. 

Lawton alleges that the companies developed and aggressively marketed ultra-processed foods made, which are made with little or no whole food ingredients. According to the complaint, these industrial formulations began reshaping the American diet in the 1980s, and now account for more than two-thirds of the average child’s daily calories.

As consumption has increased, so too has a growing body of research linking high intake of ultra-processed foods to serious health risks, including prediabetes in adolescents and young adults, as well as chronic conditions such as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and Type 2 diabetes.

Amid the growing body of research linking junk food to metabolic disease, ultra-processed food lawsuits are now being filed by individuals who claim their childhood consumption of these products led to Type 2 diabetes, NAFLD and other related disorders. The filings allege that manufacturers not only knew their formulations were engineered to drive repeat consumption, but also aggressively targeted children and teenagers to build long term brand loyalty and habitual use.

In her complaint, Lawton claims that the explosion of ultra-processed foods coincides with a surge in obesity, Type 2 diabetes and other chronic illnesses among children, conditions that were previously rare or unheard of in pediatric populations. The complaint states that prior to 1985, Type 2 diabetes was largely considered an adult-onset disease, yet rates among children have since risen dramatically, doubling in the United States between 2000 and 2017. 

The minor plaintiff, born in 2009, was diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes on May 15, 2019, at 9 years old, according to the lawsuit. His mother claims he regularly and chronically consumed ultra-processed foods manufactured and marketed by the defendants throughout his childhood, which caused metabolic dysfunction, chronic inflammation and insulin resistance that led directly to his diagnosis. 

The complaint repeatedly characterizes childhood Type 2 diabetes as a “commerciogenic disease,” alleging it would not exist without the conduct of major food corporations that allegedly borrowed strategies from the tobacco industry. According to the lawsuit, tobacco companies that acquired major food brands in the 1980s applied addiction science and sensory research previously used to make cigarettes more addictive, engineering foods with high levels of sugar, fat and salt to increase consumption and dependence. 

Lawton further alleges that the defendants targeted children and minority communities with sophisticated marketing campaigns designed to increase consumption of their products, while failing to warn about health risks. The complaint claims that as a result, between 12% and 15% of children may now meet criteria for ultra-processed food addiction, a rate described in cited research as “striking and unprecedented.”

“Due to each Defendant’s conduct, the minor-Plaintiff, J. L., was and still is caused to suffer serious and dangerous side effects including, inter alia, Type 2 Diabetes and all of its sequelae, as well as other severe and personal injuries which are permanent and lasting in nature, physical pain and mental anguish, including diminished enjoyment of life, as well as the need for lifelong medical treatment, monitoring and/or medications, and fear of developing other injuries associated with UPF.”

— Tamika Lawton v. The Kraft Heinz Company et al

The complaint raises allegations of failure to warn, defective design, negligent misrepresentation, fraud, deceptive advertising, civil conspiracy, and aiding and abetting unlawful conduct. It is seeking compensatory, punitive and statutory damages as well as other relief available under law.

Ultra-Processed Foods Lawsuits

As research continues to highlight the addictive potential of ultra-processed foods, a growing number of lawsuits have been filed nationwide against major food and beverage manufacturers. Plaintiffs allege the companies knowingly developed and promoted products linked to serious, long-term health consequences.

Many of the complaints compare the industry’s conduct to tactics once used by tobacco companies, accusing manufacturers of prioritizing profits over public health while downplaying or failing to disclose known risks. The lawsuits claim ultra-processed products were deliberately engineered with elevated levels of sugar, sodium and unhealthy fats to stimulate cravings, encourage repeat purchases and entrench habitual consumption, despite mounting evidence of harm.

In response, ultra-processed food attorneys are evaluating claims on behalf of individuals who regularly consumed these products during childhood and were later diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease or related metabolic disorders.

Sign up for more legal news that could affect you or your family.